Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FAQ: Why is charging of Motorola phones so slow on the travel charger?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Navas - 31 May 2006 19:44 GMT
Q: Why is charging of Motorola phones so slow on the travel charger?

A: The standard travel charger packaged by Motorola with many current
phones puts out insufficient power for fastest possible charging and for
continuous use while charging.

For example, charger SSW-0509 for the V551 puts out only 375 mA.  The
V551 detects this as a slow charger, and thus keeps the external display
backlight off during charging.  Worse, there's not enough current to
keep up with use of the phone while charging, so while the phone is use,
the battery will still be discharged even with the phone on the charger.
With a fast charger the external display backlight is on during
charging, and the phone can be used while the battery is charging.

Motorola makes fast 1500 mA chargers that are compatible with these phones:
* SPN4716* (where * might be "B" or "C"), also known as
* NNTN4250 (nominally for Nextel, but also works with non-Nextel phones).
These chargers are readily available from dealers and on eBay for under
$15 (plus shipping).

(For what it's worth, Motorola probably saved less than $1 in cost by
packaging slow chargers instead of fast chargers with these phones.)
NoBody - 31 May 2006 19:50 GMT
Cell Mansion - 31 May 2006 20:59 GMT
John Navas Wrote:
> (For what it's worth, Motorola probably saved less than $1 in cost by
> packaging slow chargers instead of fast chargers with these phones.)

But Motorola makes *more* when you decide to buy that extra -rapid-
charger.  :)

Signature

Cell Mansion

SMS - 31 May 2006 21:39 GMT
> John Navas Wrote:
>> (For what it's worth, Motorola probably saved less than $1 in cost by
>> packaging slow chargers instead of fast chargers with these phones.)
>
> But Motorola makes *more* when you decide to buy that extra -rapid-
> charger.  :)

Actually, if the savings per charger were even just 25 cents, the
savings to Motorola would be hundreds of thousands of dollars. Then the
carrier would be paying more for each handset, which they hate doing.

Since most people are charging their phones either overnight, or in
their vehicles, there would be no upside for Motorola to add cost to
every phone they sell in order to include faster charger.

As to the number of rapid chargers they sell after the fact, it's
probably barely a break-even item.
John Navas - 31 May 2006 23:54 GMT
>> John Navas Wrote:
>>> (For what it's worth, Motorola probably saved less than $1 in cost by
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>As to the number of rapid chargers they sell after the fact, it's
>probably barely a break-even item.

The charger choice in the Cingular package is made by Cingular, not Motorola.

Signature

Best regards,        SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.