Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

EU Officials OK Cap on Roaming Charges

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jer - 14 Apr 2007 23:20 GMT
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=3033966

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

DevilsPGD - 15 Apr 2007 00:13 GMT
>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=3033966

| The industry committee voted for the retail price ceiling to take effect
| after the regulation is approved and apply automatically to all
| customers, unless they opt for a package with higher roaming fees that
| would be, for instance, compensated for by a lower tariff for domestic
| calls.

That looks like a loophole waiting to happen...

Unless there is a cap on domestic calls, the solution is simple, raise
domestic calls to $100/minute, and offer roaming at the previous rates
in exchange for the current domestic rates.

Signature

Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.

John Navas - 17 Apr 2007 16:04 GMT
>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=3033966
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>domestic calls to $100/minute, and offer roaming at the previous rates
>in exchange for the current domestic rates.

Except that would wipe the carrier out in the market.  What would keep
that from happening is brutal competition.  Roaming rates are inflated
because the market doesn't pay much attention to them.

Signature

Best regards,        FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

DevilsPGD - 17 Apr 2007 18:51 GMT
>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=3033966
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>that from happening is brutal competition.  Roaming rates are inflated
>because the market doesn't pay much attention to them.

How do you figure?  The loophole plan would become the defacto standard
plan, since not many users would opt for the $100/minute option.

Signature

I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.

John Navas - 17 Apr 2007 19:11 GMT
>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=3033966
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>How do you figure?  The loophole plan would become the defacto standard
>plan, since not many users would opt for the $100/minute option.

That would almost certainly run afoul of the EU and result in big fines.

Signature

Best regards,        FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

DevilsPGD - 17 Apr 2007 19:37 GMT
>>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=3033966
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>That would almost certainly run afoul of the EU and result in big fines.

What part?  Charging too much money?  Or having almost everyone choose a
second plan?

Signature

I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.

John Navas - 17 Apr 2007 19:57 GMT
>>>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=3033966
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>What part?  Charging too much money?  Or having almost everyone choose a
>second plan?

Trying to evade the order.  Unlike the USA (under Republicans at least),
the EU has smart and effective enforcement.

Signature

Best regards,        FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

DTC - 17 Apr 2007 23:19 GMT
> Unlike the USA (under Republicans at least),
> the EU has smart and effective enforcement.

[snicker mode engaged]

Which is good as we in the U.S. have to deal with some pretty stupid laws.
John Navas - 18 Apr 2007 16:13 GMT
>> Unlike the USA (under Republicans at least),
>> the EU has smart and effective enforcement.
>
>[snicker mode engaged]
>
>Which is good as we in the U.S. have to deal with some pretty stupid laws.

Makes no sense not to enforce the good ones just because we also have
some stupid ones.

Signature

Best regards,        FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas          <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

DevilsPGD - 19 Apr 2007 00:21 GMT
>>> Unlike the USA (under Republicans at least),
>>> the EU has smart and effective enforcement.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Makes no sense not to enforce the good ones just because we also have
>some stupid ones.

Who decides which ones are good ones and which ones are stupid ones?

Signature

I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.