>The other incentive for Cingular is that GSM is the
>world standard and most Cingular phones operate at both 1800mhz and 1900mhz
>GSM giving them ready access to the world market. Investing in a GSM phone
>is your best bet if you travel outside the US.
cingular does *not* use 1800 Mhz. No US carrier does. cingular
operates at 1900 and 850/800 Mhz.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To send an email reply send to
GSMthemobilestandard (@) yahoo.com
John S. - 03 Nov 2003 01:13 GMT
>>The other incentive for Cingular is that GSM is the
>>world standard and most Cingular phones operate at both 1800mhz and 1900mhz
>>GSM
No they don't!!! It amazes me at the stupid statements that are made in this
newsgroup!
--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
Group Special Mobile - 03 Nov 2003 13:54 GMT
>>>The other incentive for Cingular is that GSM is the
>>>world standard and most Cingular phones operate at both 1800mhz and 1900mhz
>>>GSM
>
>No they don't!!! It amazes me at the stupid statements that are made in this
>newsgroup!
Pot/kettle/black
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To send an email reply send to
GSMthemobilestandard (@) yahoo.com
Joe Versaggi - 03 Nov 2003 22:15 GMT
>>>The other incentive for Cingular is that GSM is the
>>>world standard and most Cingular phones operate at both 1800mhz and 1900mhz
>>>GSM
I don't care what they use in Europe and Asia. GSM here is skeletal and
useless in remote areas. I'll stick to TDMA and AMPS for at least
another 5 years.
> No they don't!!! It amazes me at the stupid statements that are made in this
> newsgroup!
JRW - 05 Nov 2003 04:16 GMT
> I don't care what they use in Europe and Asia. GSM here is skeletal and
> useless in remote areas. I'll stick to TDMA and AMPS for at least
> another 5 years.
Believe it or not, company I'm working for just gave a Motorola 3 Watt
bag phone for my truck! Good thinking...its the only phone that works
reliably in the hilly countryside out here.
Group Special Mobile - 05 Nov 2003 13:41 GMT
>> I don't care what they use in Europe and Asia. GSM here is skeletal and
>> useless in remote areas. I'll stick to TDMA and AMPS for at least
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>bag phone for my truck! Good thinking...its the only phone that works
>reliably in the hilly countryside out here.
And who will they use to activate service?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To send an email reply send to
GSMthemobilestandard (@) yahoo.com
> First of all, the GAIT phone is a "bridge" phone until they complete the gsm
> build out-switching from GSM to TDMA .
May be a very long "bridge" depending on how long it takes partner
carriers to convert if ever. *I* suspect we *will* see more GAIT models
before this mess is over.
> served by the GAIT phone. On GSM you can get a Family Talk Nations Plan and
> avoid roaming charges but the GAIT phone is limited to the Preferred Nations
> Plan which only avoids roaming charges if you are on the Cingular
> network-ie: a cingular tower. Visit www.cingular.com. Of the two GAIT
There is no "Preferred" Nations plan any more at least not ordered from
Dallas. There is a "Cingular Nation GSM" and a "Cingular Nation". The
"Cingular Nation" requires a GAIT phone but there is NO roaming charges
regardless of carrier. Also included--long distance, rollover minutes,
and night&weekend minutes--but no family plan.
Compare the maps for the two nations plans--counting the "future
coverage" on the GSM-only plan--the difference is TDMA/AMPS only
PARTNERS--and you can see why I say GAIT will be around for awhile.

Signature
Jud
Dallas TX USA
JRW - 29 Oct 2003 20:02 GMT
>>First of all, the GAIT phone is a "bridge" phone until they complete the gsm
>>build out-switching from GSM to TDMA .
>
> May be a very long "bridge" depending on how long it takes partner
> carriers to convert if ever. *I* suspect we *will* see more GAIT models
> before this mess is over.
From my experience and knowledge of who can do contracting, I'd say
that 10-15 crews could be deployed in the U.S. at any given time from
companies that have the necessary RF test equipment and experience.
It takes 6-8 hours to convert a site over to GSM. It would take those
crews at least a month to convert an area the size of Kansas to GSM.
Of course there are some variables above (other than the 6-8 hours
per site), but at least it should give you an idea that the entire
U.S. isn't going to be convert in less than a year and could be done
within 3 years.
N9WOS - 29 Oct 2003 20:44 GMT
> From my experience and knowledge of who can do contracting, I'd say
> that 10-15 crews could be deployed in the U.S. at any given time from
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> U.S. isn't going to be convert in less than a year and could be done
> within 3 years.
That 6 to 8 hour figure would be reasonable if they already
have the modular units to replace the ones currently in service.
And all they would be doing is a switch out.
Which wouldn't be the norm.
You have to factor in lead time and everything else.
You have to get your suppliers to come up with units to fit the
racks that is already present at the site, and the units would
have to be compatible with the equipment that is already at the site.
Otherwise, you would have to change all the auxiliary equipment to suite
the new modules, which would easily take a day or more.
Then you have to wait for the suppliers to produce the equipment.
If you can't get units that can be installed in the pre existing racks,
or you have a few sites that have one of a kind equipment
that would be too costly to build equipment for.
(ie)proprietary design.
Then you have to rip out the hardware and control equipment and
start from scratch.
If the control equipment is located in an immobile structure, then
it could take days for a team to finish the switch out.
and the cell site would be off line for most of that time.
If the site is located in a movable prefab enclosure, then it would
be quicker to disconnect the enclosure from the tower and remove it.
Then bring a new preprepared unit in a hook it back up.
It would take one night to do, with a few days lead time to
build the new unit off site.
JRW - 30 Oct 2003 02:52 GMT
>> From my experience and knowledge of who can do contracting, I'd say
>>that 10-15 crews could be deployed in the U.S. at any given time from
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Which wouldn't be the norm.
That's correct, I didn't review what I posted as one of my dogs
started to pee on one of my tool boxes.
At any rate, it ain't gonna be all done by this spring.
N9WOS - 29 Oct 2003 20:59 GMT
> May be a very long "bridge" depending on how long it takes partner
> carriers to convert if ever. *I* suspect we *will* see more GAIT models
> before this mess is over.
I wonder if the temporary bridge may become a permanent one.
Like the wooden bridges across the streams around here.
They put them in and kept saying that they was only temporary.
They was going to put in new concrete bridges in a while.
Well.....
10 years have passed, and we are still driving over the same
wooden bridges.
Sometimes, if something works good, it's just easier to leave it alone.
I also wonder if GAIT will evolve.
(ie)a GAIT "like" phone that also has CDMA.
Then add 900 and 1800 to it, then you have a true world phone.
850, 900, 1800, 1900 gsm
850 amps
850, 1900 tdma
850, 1900 cdma
Now that would be a kick a$$ phone.
And I wonder if they would ever offer A GAIT phone
on a nation wide prepaid plan. :-)