 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / February 2008NEWS: Verizon Wireless, AT&T in price duel ($100/mo for unlimited voice)
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the Sprint network): <http://www.helio.com/>  SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR AT&T/CINGULAR WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> ><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the >Sprint network): <http://www.helio.com/> "Unlimited mobile plans spark price war concerns" <http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1930076320080219> T-Mobile has now followed suit: "Verizon Wireless, AT&T Offer Flat-Rate Calling Plans (Update5)" <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aRTvicjNc9P4&refer=home> SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR AT&T/CINGULAR WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> ><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the >Sprint network): <http://www.helio.com/> Had you read the real news group alt.cellular.attws, rather than this archaic one, you'd have seen my post of the same link 20 minutes before you. >><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >>No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >archaic one, you'd have seen my post of the same link 20 minutes >before you. Had you read the entire thread in this newsgroup, instead of playing in a defunct newsgroup, you would have seen a good deal of additional information. SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR AT&T/CINGULAR WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> >>><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >>>No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > a defunct newsgroup, you would have seen a good deal of additional > information. Children, behave! >>>><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >>>>No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >Children, behave! I respectfully suggest you take your own advice. SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR AT&T/CINGULAR WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> >>>>><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >>>>>No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > I respectfully suggest you take your own advice. You first; here, and in the other groups you traffic. >>>>>><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >>>>>>No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >You first; here, and in the other groups you traffic. Thanks for proving my point. SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR AT&T/CINGULAR WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> >>>>>>><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >>>>>>>No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Thanks for proving my point. And you, mine. Not that it was ever in doubt. >>><http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_hi_te/verizon_wireless_unlimited> >>>No data is included. For $100/mo unlimited voice with data (on the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >a defunct newsgroup, you would have seen a good deal of additional >information. Actually the attws newsgroup is hardly defunct, as ATT lives, Cingular is defunct. The attws newsgroup gets more posts than the withering Cingular one does. Everyone knows and accepts that but Navas. >>Had you read the entire thread in this newsgroup, instead of playing in >>a defunct newsgroup, you would have seen a good deal of additional >>information. > >Actually the attws newsgroup is hardly defunct, as ATT lives, Cingular >is defunct. ATTWS is defunct, absorbed into Cingular, which then morphed into AT&T Mobility, for which there is no specific newsgroup. >The attws newsgroup gets more posts than the withering Cingular one >does. True, albeit most of them noise from trolls and bashers. SignatureBest regards, FAQ FOR AT&T/CINGULAR WIRELESS: John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.