Cingular has the better deal, but I get the impression that Verizon
has better service (reception, dead spots, etc.) in New York City.
Also, does Cingular use T-Mobile's network in New York City?
TIA for any comments/recommendations.
danny burstein - 28 Nov 2003 21:36 GMT
>Cingular has the better deal, but I get the impression that Verizon
>has better service (reception, dead spots, etc.) in New York City.
>Also, does Cingular use T-Mobile's network in New York City?
>TIA for any comments/recommendations.
In the NYC area Cingular mooches off of T-Mobile's infrastructure. But
it's a friendly arrangement - T-Mobile does the same in part of Cingular's
California coverage.
So... you'll get the exact same performance whether you're signed up for
TM or Cingular.
WIth the disclosure that I'm a TM shareholder, I find their service in the
NYC region quite good.

Signature
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
Chris Russell - 29 Nov 2003 02:37 GMT
Cingular uses T-Mobile in NYC and T-Mobile uses Cingular in Southern
CA. A shared spectrum deal made a number of years ago. But it is
rumored that T-Mobile callers in NYC get priority.
Chris
Please respond on Usenet
> Cingular has the better deal, but I get the impression that Verizon
> has better service (reception, dead spots, etc.) in New York City.
> Also, does Cingular use T-Mobile's network in New York City?
> TIA for any comments/recommendations.