Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Cingular / January 2004
Why is Unlimited Nights and Weekends limited to 5000 minutes
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Roopinder Randhawa - 01 Jan 2004 10:51 GMT I am an NYC Taxi driver and cell phone forms an integral part of my life as it keeps me sane during traffic jams, bad customer, telling what airport is busy, keeping in touch with my family and all those lonely nights on the streets of Manhattan
Working in the night time is good and as Cingular offers 7 PM N&W I am interested in it. But when I called CS they said the limit is strictly 5000 and that is only 83 hours and 20 minutes. I use that much in 1 week. Additional minutes are 45 cents each.
There is no work around for this according to CS. That sucks.
Now I am thinking to use sprint but their network in NYC is not as strong.
If T-Mobile offered 7 PM I'd use that.
Any recommendations.
John S. - 01 Jan 2004 13:15 GMT >Any recommendations. It sounds as though your job allows you a unique opportunity to check out all the carriers.
As far as I know all of the carriers allow from 14 days to 30 days to get a phone, check it out, and return it within the specified time period.
I think that I would advise you to go to all of the carriers (in the same day) and sign up for whatever their best plan for you is. Then ht the streets keeping close watch on the return time for each carrier.
You then can evaluate them all and return all of those that don't meet your needs and keep the one that works BEST for YOU.
Keep in mind, what is best for me is not necessarily best for someone else.
-- John S. e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 01 Jan 2004 13:25 GMT > If T-Mobile offered 7 PM I'd use that. Ummmm, they do.....
Rod - 01 Jan 2004 15:42 GMT :: In article <aZSIb.73024$4F2.7155787@twister.nyc.rr.com>, :: "Roopinder Randhawa" <roopmail@yahoo.com> wrote: :: ::: If T-Mobile offered 7 PM I'd use that. :: :: Ummmm, they do..... Ummmm, they don't.............
Weeknight minutes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Includes Free Long Distance and Roaming nationwide. Ideal for those who use their phones frequently at night. Available for new activations on nationwide, unlimited weekend rate plans $39.99 or higher. Nights run from 9:00 pm to 6:59 am Monday through Friday. Rate plans not eligible: Neighborhood/Regional, Sidekick $39.99.
plane - 01 Jan 2004 20:40 GMT > :: In article <aZSIb.73024$4F2.7155787@twister.nyc.rr.com>, > :: "Roopinder Randhawa" <roopmail@yahoo.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Nights run from 9:00 pm to 6:59 am Monday through Friday. > Rate plans not eligible: Neighborhood/Regional, Sidekick $39.99. I know its an odd suggestion, but with the number of minutes you are indicating and i'm sure that 7pm is as priority, why not get 2 lines, one possibly with another carrier--would give you back up, and if you went say with the sprint phone, you would be guaranteed the unlimited, and should you have reception problems with 1 service, you would have another to try .
Jud Hardcastle - 01 Jan 2004 17:51 GMT > Working in the night time is good and as Cingular offers 7 PM N&W I am > interested in it. But when I called CS they said the limit is strictly 5000 > and that is only 83 hours and 20 minutes. I use that much in 1 week. > Additional minutes are 45 cents each. Whoa. Think about that. That's 83 STRAIGHT hours. To use that up in 1 week you'd have to be working a 12 hour shift 7 days a week and talking 100% of the time!!! Remind me not to take your cab :-). Even if you talk 15 minutes out of every hour for a 10 hour shift that's only 150 minutes/night. 5000 minutes would last the month even if you didn't have any nights off.
Besides, I would bet that additional N&W minutes would come out of the normal plan minutes. The 45 cent minutes should be after ALL the plan minutes were used up. If you got that from a regular salesperson it could be guess--the average salesperson would never hit that situation. I'd definately have them confirm it.
If they come out of plan minutes you could get a 4500 minute plan for about $300. And that's not the real limit--you can negotiate as many minutes as you need if you talk to the corporate/business office instead of the consumer salesperson. Carriers doen't actually care how MANY phones are on a corporate plan--just what the monthly $$$ would be.
 Signature Jud Dallas TX USA
Roopinder Randhawa - 02 Jan 2004 09:42 GMT Well all minutes are rounded to the next one. Also I have conference calls. 83 hours wane away sooner than you think. The reason why I prefer T-Mobile is that it allows up to 5 (five) people to be on the same time. I don't do that but 3 is common place. Also driving in NYC is not that easy dealing with customers who get in the cab and say "Take me to my home" BUT do not tell you the street address. Phones do help here. Also when you are lost in NJ or CT that same phone comes to your aid.
I think Cingular also allows more than 2 people in the conference call.
Sprint PCS and Verizon (my current carrier) do not allow more than 2 people and I do not daisy chain calls (on occasions I have but then one break in the link and there you have it).
Also a GSM is a preference because it can receive text messages (SMS) from anywhere in the world that has GSM roaming agreement with our US carriers.
AT&T GSM sucks as it gets cut too many times. I do not want that. T-Mobile is pretty stable. Cingular is stable enough but does become bandwidth strapped in the 9PM to 10PM window.
Sprint is really a network that DOES not work well in NYC. I have day time shift friends that have unlimited SPRINT PCS to SPRINT PCS calling but then the calls are very short as tall buildings and numerous bridges and tunnels are a hindrance to them and they are lost on every turn. And 99% I am in Manhattan or New York, NY.
There are extreme users and I am one of them. Say what you will. When you drive here then tell me that nonsense of not getting in my cab.
> > Working in the night time is good and as Cingular offers 7 PM N&W I am > > interested in it. But when I called CS they said the limit is strictly 5000 [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Jud > Dallas TX USA Elmo P. Shagnasty - 02 Jan 2004 10:10 GMT > There are extreme users and I am one of them. Say what you will. When you > drive here then tell me that nonsense of not getting in my cab. Ah, what did cabbies do before cell phones.
It all worked out.
A cell phone is not a REQUIREMENT in your position. Work smarter, not harder.
Jeffsnewjetta - 02 Jan 2004 12:37 GMT the number of people who say they can use all 5000 minutes, and the amount of people who actually USE all 5000 minutes are so different it's not even funny.
hence, the company loses nothing Jeff Ream
I am the drummer your color guard captain warned you about
Carl. - 03 Jan 2004 00:40 GMT > > There are extreme users and I am one of them. Say what you will. When you > > drive here then tell me that nonsense of not getting in my cab. > > Ah, what did cabbies do before cell phones. > > It all worked out. Did it really? Just because the Earth did not crash into the sun does not mean "it all worked out."
> A cell phone is not a REQUIREMENT in your position. Work smarter, not > harder. Here comes the clue stick . . .
Working as a cabbie without a cell phone IS the harder way.
Eljefe - 03 Jan 2004 02:57 GMT > > > There are extreme users and I am one of them. Say what you will. When > you [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Working as a cabbie without a cell phone IS the harder way. No, it is not the harder way. Cab drivers using one all the time is making life harder for everyone else who has to watch out for you lunatics who never meet a traffic rule that they would obey. If you cab drivers paid attention to the traffic around you and showed a little respect for other drivers and had just a bit of common courtesy, you might get a bit sympathy and respect from the rest of us New Yorkers. However you cab drivers are always on the phone, driving all over the road , never staying in a traffic lane for more than fifty feet. If cabs were banned from Manhattan and we had better bus service, life for all of the rest of us drivers would be a lot easier. If you get the impression that I think cab drivers are the top five list of things that should not exist you would be correct.
Carl. - 03 Jan 2004 06:01 GMT > > > > There are extreme users and I am one of them. Say what you will. When > > you [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > harder for everyone else who has to watch out for you lunatics who never meet a > traffic rule that they would obey. OK, go ahead and assume things. Then go off on a canned rant that you pulled out, applying no thought at all to the issue being discussed.
Roopinder Randhawa - 03 Jan 2004 13:38 GMT As for the remark that cabbies are not in your top five of NON-EXISTENT things.
1.. NYC [Manhattan] cannot do without the YELLOW. 2.. Other boroughs [viz. Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island] are served by black cars or better known as GYPSY CABS. 3.. All the NYC cabbies are not illiterate. 4.. My way of working is same as butcher. He has nothing against the cow that his knife will put an end to. It is just a way of life and making a living. 5.. I think you have never driven in NYC and form the "pedestrian lot" that moves as if they had shackles on their feet. I'd recommend you not to either. Only 3 types of services can successfully navigate the streets of NYC, the NYPD, the FDNY and Yellow Cabs. The last one has NO sirens and legal teeth. Still they manage. 6.. If I am talking to a passenger, I have to use the same tongue and brain coordination to reply to him as I would on a cell phone. 7.. Half of the people arriving in NYC by services like MTA and airports on a daily basis are lost even though they know that city obeys a grid system.
Here is an article in the New York Times. It was published on July 17, 2003.
Slide into a cab in New York City, shut the door, and there's that murmur.
It's not the radio, but the driver's voice - aimed not at the passenger, but at the dangling microphone of a hidden cellular phone.
More often than not, the fleeting Punjabi or Creole or Arabic words are lost on the unwitting listener sitting behind the partition; most passengers come and go without knowing the substance of the low-pitched chats. Some find it annoying; others think a foreign-language station is on the radio.
"I sometimes ask them to turn it down," said Maya Goldschmidt, a hurried Manhattan lawyer, as she coasted down Park Avenue in the back seat of a taxi.
But days and nights spent in dozens of cabs, where conversations were recorded and translated, have revealed a spectacular alternate world of words beamed from cellphones to invisible audiences around the city and planet. Though cabdrivers are not supposed to talk on cellphones while driving, even with a hands-free device, the long black cord has become something of a cultural lifeline - to mothers in faraway lands, to children unseen during 12-hour shifts, and to the humor and commiseration of other drivers braving the same lonely streets.
"Some people call their countries, some of them call their friends, some are busy with the chick," explained Sarabjeet Multani, a fast-driving Punjabi who said he decided to move to the United States after seeing "Baywatch" on television.
Cab cell talk covers a spectrum of emotion - depending on the driver and the moment - from light banter about cheap tips and good-looking passengers to queries about traffic, to heated political debate and urgent inquiries about ailing relatives overseas. It rides high in consternation and low in reflection. It pauses at intersections and then resumes, sometimes halfway through a new trip, giving a sudden fright to passengers who have not yet spotted the dangling cord and think the drivers have gone mad.
It runs in linguistic packs.
There is the posse of Punjabi cousins who jump on and off a nightly conference call. There is the group of Sherpa drivers who went to the same high school in Nepal and now debate - on a cellphone family plan - the Maoist guerrilla occupation of their hometown.
And there is the clan of Salvadorans who subscribe to the same Nextel walkie-talkie system, where women and soccer often dominate the banter.
Soon after dropping off Ms. Goldschmidt, the lawyer, in Midtown, the cabdriver, Manuel Molina, was on the phone again.
"Are we going to the barbecue or not?" shouted Mr. Molina, in Spanish.
"I don't know," answered a man named Walter.
"I'm counting on you for the beer," said Mr. Molina, who is 29 and Salvadoran.
"Go to hell," Walter shot back.
"You lowlife," answered Mr. Molina, letting out a guttural laugh as he slid his four-door minivan around a corner and up Madison Avenue. He scanned the streets for customers. "It's lazy out there today," he added. "Where's the work?"
That last question cuts across all languages and national identities to dominate the cab-cell discourse.
Drivers check in with one another to compare earnings midway through a shift, and share tips on heavy foot traffic with phrases like, "Penn Station's moving right now" or "Go to the Port Authority."
"We are always connected," said Umar Iqbal, 24, a Pakistani. "We keep listening to each other so we can judge where to go."
Mr. Iqbal is among 20,000 to 24,000 licensed and active drivers in New York City, according to the New York Taxi Workers Alliance. Most of them have cellphones, and many say they avoid using them while driving.
Either that is true, or the city has caught few violators: in fiscal year 2003, only 66 cellphone violations, which carry a $200 fine, were issued to cabdrivers, according to the Taxi and Limousine Commission.
Drivers say they began using the phones en masse over the last five years, propelled by the advent of affordable cellphone plans that allow for free night and weekend talk.
"You have to think like them," said Joseph Hennessy, general manager of Team Systems, a fleet of more than 300 cabs. "They leave their house at 5 a.m., don't see their kids, they come home in the afternoon. It's a source of contact for their families. Imagine you're the wife of a taxi driver and you're sitting at home."
Jatinder Kaur is such a wife. She frets at her home in Queens and worries that her husband, Manjeet Singh, may be robbed. So, she calls him on the hour. His guiding rule is to always, without fail, take her calls.
Such is the edict of Ibnou Sidibe, 50, from Senegal. But aside from retrieving his wife's calls, the phone sits in its cradle. "I'm a very quiet guy," said Mr. Sidibe, who has a degree in architecture from a school in France. "I like loneliness."
For the more sociable of cabdrivers, the cellphone is still mixed with the CB radio, which features at least three channels solely for Punjabi drivers.
Walia Singh Surinder flips through them on a ghostly weeknight with his right hand, his left one gliding over the wheel. His light has been on for more than an hour.
"The CB is easy talk," says Dr. Surinder, a former optometrist from Punjab who now lives in Queens with his wife and three daughters. He stops at Channel 33, calls in and gets his friend Bhatia.
"Hey Uncle Bhatia, how is business?" he says in Punjabi. (This conversation and several others were recorded with the drivers' permission and later translated.)
"Today is very slow. Where are you now?"
"At 52nd and Seventh."
"Are you going somewhere on summer vacation?"
"No, no. No money, no honey."
Then the cellphone rings. It is his wife.
"I am O.K. I've been on the street since 8 in the morning. You have no work in the house? You are calling me all the time."
He hangs up after a quick salute to his daughter, and reaches for his other favorite diversion on slow nights - Indian techno-rap dance music. The car begins to thump.
"Cellphones are a driver's link to the rest of the world," said Bruce Schaller, an urban transportation consultant who researches the taxi industry. "Driving a cab is a very isolating experience as there's no longer a lot of conversation between drivers and passengers. Legend has it that there once was."
There may no longer be enough time for such an exchange.
"They're talking in another language and it never ends," said Ruth Britten, a retired fashion executive who lives in Manhattan. "It's a rolling conversation. You're with them 100 blocks and they're on the phone the whole time. And they don't listen to where you want to go and they pass the street."
Some cabdrivers think passengers could use restraint in their own cellphone etiquette. "If a customer is talking it distracts me," said Azeem Rizbi, 37, of Punjab, who freely admits that he talks on his own cellphone while driving. "Some customers talk about their personal problems. They say, `Oh stop it.' I think they're telling me to stop the cab."
Traffic drifts lazily past A. B. Johnson's cab, parked midafternoon on a recent weekday near Houston Street. Again and again, he dials the number on his prepaid calling card to his hometown near Lagos, Nigeria.
His close friend Asimiyu picks up on the third try. The two talk - in Yoruba - about the status of Mr. Johnson's green card application. He has not seen his mother in 13 years.
"My mother keeps saying she doesn't want to be dead before I come home," says Mr. Johnson, 40, who lives in Queens.
A minute later, Asimiyu admits, "Mother thinks that you brushed her aside."
"Please help me explain to her that I am not being bad to her," Mr. Johnson says. "If I come home now I cannot come back to the U.S."
The calling card bleeds out of time. He shifts the car into gear, and pulls out in search of customers.
"It's a very long shift," says Mr. Johnson, who has been working since 4 a.m. "You have to work hard in New York."
> > > > There are extreme users and I am one of them. Say what you will. When > > you [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > think cab drivers are the top five list of things that should not exist you > would be correct. Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 06:00 GMT > 5.. I think you have never driven in NYC and form the "pedestrian lot" >that moves as if they had shackles on their feet. I'd recommend you not to >either. Only 3 types of services can successfully navigate the streets of >NYC, the NYPD, the FDNY and Yellow Cabs. I never have a problem navigating the streets, unless something closes a street, or a traffic light doesn't change, and I drive a plain civilian car.
> 6.. If I am talking to a passenger, I have to use the same tongue and >brain coordination to reply to him as I would on a cell phone. Some people are like that. Some people can't pay attention to the road when they're on the phone. Unfortunately there's no certification for using a cell phone while driving - there should be.
> 7.. Half of the people arriving in NYC by services like MTA and airports >on a daily basis are lost even though they know that city obeys a grid >system. In Manhattan. In the other boroughs most "foreigners" (those not living in the neighborhood) are always lost.
>"Cellphones are a driver's link to the rest of the world," said Bruce >Schaller, an urban transportation consultant who researches the taxi >industry. "Driving a cab is a very isolating experience as there's no longer >a lot of conversation between drivers and passengers. Legend has it that >there once was." Legend has it right. Passengers even used to sit up front with the driver.
Cyrus Afzali - 04 Jan 2004 20:15 GMT >> 5.. I think you have never driven in NYC and form the "pedestrian lot" >>that moves as if they had shackles on their feet. I'd recommend you not to [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >In Manhattan. In the other boroughs most "foreigners" (those not >living in the neighborhood) are always lost. Actually, there are parts of other boroughs that follow a grid too. Astoria, Queens, for example, has a grid that's just as easy to follow as Manhattan's.
Peterbilt - 04 Jan 2004 20:29 GMT When people (native New Yorkers) say NYC they usually mean the whole five boros, when talking about the boro, NYC, people usually say Manhattan.
> >> 5.. I think you have never driven in NYC and form the "pedestrian lot" > >>that moves as if they had shackles on their feet. I'd recommend you not to [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > Astoria, Queens, for example, has a grid that's just as easy to follow > as Manhattan's. Cyrus Afzali - 04 Jan 2004 22:26 GMT >When people (native New Yorkers) say NYC they usually mean the whole five >boros, when talking about the boro, NYC, people usually say Manhattan. Not really. In actuality, it's the opposite. NY'ers always specify the borough they're referring to, even though the city's been consolidated since 1898. People who've lived here for some time still think of "the city" as being Manhattan and will refer to the other boroughs by name.
Nevertheless, the original point that was made was that Manhattan followed a grid whereas the other boroughs didn't. That too isn't true. There are other examples, just not as widely known.
>> >> 5.. I think you have never driven in NYC and form the "pedestrian lot" >> >>that moves as if they had shackles on their feet. I'd recommend you not [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >> Astoria, Queens, for example, has a grid that's just as easy to follow >> as Manhattan's. Peterbilt - 05 Jan 2004 01:16 GMT The city and NYC are two different things. When I say the "city" I am referring to Manhattan but when I say NYC I am referring to the whole five boros of New York City. And yes, I know, when NYers are referring to a particular boro they use it by name but as I said, when referring to the whole five boros they use NYC.
There are grids in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. Staten Island I think there are some parts. I used to drive a truck in the Bronx so I know it very well and I have lived in Queens my whole life so I pretty much have that down too but you have top remember that no boro is 100% grid. Just think of downtown Manhattan, if that's a grid then I'm Ruddy G.
> >When people (native New Yorkers) say NYC they usually mean the whole five > >boros, when talking about the boro, NYC, people usually say Manhattan. [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > >> Astoria, Queens, for example, has a grid that's just as easy to follow > >> as Manhattan's. John S. - 05 Jan 2004 10:16 GMT >The city and NYC are two different things. I am so glad that other people agree with me!! THE City is San Francisco. NYC is that mess here on the East Coast!
-- John S. e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
Al Klein - 06 Jan 2004 05:19 GMT >Nevertheless, the original point that was made was that Manhattan >followed a grid whereas the other boroughs didn't. That too isn't >true. There are other examples, just not as widely known. The city follows a grid that consists almost entirely of N/S avenues and E/W streets, each numbered consecutively (if you know which named avenues are which numbers) in the mid-town area. The other boroughs add named streets, different number sets (Lane, Path, Place, Road, Beach streets, Bath streets, etc.) and, in Richmond, nothing very regular at all.
None of which matters to natives - you learn what's where and don't really think about navigating through 4 counties as part of one city. (Most New Yorkers aren't too familiar with Staten Island.)
Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 23:45 GMT On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:29:10 -0500, "Peterbilt" <amazon-bitch@REMOVETHISeudoramail.com> posted to alt.cellular.verizon:
>When people (native New Yorkers) say NYC they usually mean the whole five >boros, when talking about the boro, NYC, people usually say Manhattan. Except when they say "the city", which may mean either. :)
Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 23:44 GMT >Actually, there are parts of other boroughs that follow a grid too. >Astoria, Queens, for example, has a grid that's just as easy to follow >as Manhattan's. Almost. Newtown Ave., Newtown Road, the western end of Astoria Blvd., Crescent St. Most of Queens is pretty grid-like, though.
Roopinder Randhawa - 05 Jan 2004 09:05 GMT Maybe of all the five boroughs Queens is the most difficult to learn. Here you have the maze of 84 street(ST), 84 Road(RD), 84 Court(CT), 84 Lane(LN), 84 Terrace (TERR) all in the same place.
People specify other boroughs when taking a cab to them. Mostly use use neighbourhood names directly as I am going to Crown Heights (Brooklyn) and then the address. For Manhattan they'd say "I am going to 9th Ave and 34 th Street on the near right corner" when they take the cab in Manhattan. If they took it in the borough of Queens they'd say the same but add in "Manhattan" or "the city".
The only borough not refered to as by name is Queens as even postal authority accepts it as names of neighbourhood.
Queens is pretty smaller grids put together irregularly. Brooklyn can be said a grid in some parts. There are no grid like properties in Staten Island or Bronx.
> >Actually, there are parts of other boroughs that follow a grid too. > >Astoria, Queens, for example, has a grid that's just as easy to follow > >as Manhattan's. > > Almost. Newtown Ave., Newtown Road, the western end of Astoria Blvd., > Crescent St. Most of Queens is pretty grid-like, though. Peterbilt - 05 Jan 2004 12:27 GMT In Queens for the most part avenues go east/west, streets, places, roads and lanes go north/south. Blvds can go either way as in Woodhaven Blvd and Queens Blvd. Courts and crescents are usually small streets that can also go in either direction but crescents are usually semi-circles... hence the name. Also, odd numbered addresses are either on the north or west side of a particular street and even numbered addresses on the opposite side (south and west). Street numbers as in 34th avenue, 32nd Avenue get lower as you head south, the same direction the address numbers go (the Bronx is somewhat similar). In Manhattan it is different, 5th Avenue is the center and all streets go either East or West from there. Addresses 00 - 99 on the west side would be between 5th and 6th, 100 - 199 between 6th and 7th and so on. I'm not sure on the East side though, I think it gets a little hairy over there. If you think about it the city was set up very logically. (I know this because I've spent about three or four years working for RPS, which is now FedEx ground and then I worked for Roadway Express for eight years... all driving time in either the Bronx or Queens. I drove in Brooklyn sometimes but I could never get the hang or feel of Brooklyn)
There are a lot of grid lines in the Bronx but most of them are on the west side.149th St all the way up to Fordham Road is a grid. Jerome Ave is the dividing lie from East and West but the Bronx travels much more east then it does west. The east side is definitely a nicer area but you can't deny that everything west of Webster Avenue, in fact maybe even White Plains Road is a grid except maybe parts of the South Bronx
> Maybe of all the five boroughs Queens is the most difficult to learn. Here > you have the maze of 84 street(ST), 84 Road(RD), 84 Court(CT), 84 Lane(LN), [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Almost. Newtown Ave., Newtown Road, the western end of Astoria Blvd., > > Crescent St. Most of Queens is pretty grid-like, though. G R - 06 Jan 2004 00:35 GMT > In Queens for the most part avenues go east/west, streets, places, roads and > lanes go north/south. Blvds can go either way as in Woodhaven Blvd and Who else is glad they don't live in that zoo?
Shlomo Ha Melech - 06 Jan 2004 00:43 GMT > > In Queens for the most part avenues go east/west, streets, places, roads > and > > lanes go north/south. Blvds can go either way as in Woodhaven Blvd and > > Who else is glad they don't live in that zoo? There are approximately 2,300,000 people here and most seem to like Queens quite a bit.
Peterbilt - 06 Jan 2004 04:06 GMT I would rather live here than anywhere else in NYC. Manhattan is way too crowded, the Bronx is too difficult to get around with public transportation, Staten Island is too far away from the rest of the city and Brooklyn... well, not to offend anyone but unless you live in the pricey areas of Brooklyn it could be kind of dangerous to go out during the day, let alone at night. (my opinion and not meant to offend anyone)
If I had my choice though I would move out of NYC all together because I really can't handle the summers here. Alaska, now there's a small piece of the US with a slight chill to it. ;)
> > > In Queens for the most part avenues go east/west, streets, places, roads > > and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > There are approximately 2,300,000 people here and most seem to like Queens quite > a bit. Al Klein - 06 Jan 2004 05:22 GMT >Maybe of all the five boroughs Queens is the most difficult to learn. Here >you have the maze of 84 street(ST), 84 Road(RD), 84 Court(CT), 84 Lane(LN), >84 Terrace (TERR) all in the same place. You forgot 84th Avenue, and not all of them run in the same direction.
>The only borough not refered to as by name is Queens as even postal >authority accepts it as names of neighbourhood. Well ...
I think you'd understand an address "in Flatbush".
>Queens is pretty smaller grids put together irregularly. Brooklyn can be >said a grid in some parts. There are no grid like properties in Staten >Island or Bronx. Staten Island is like Brooklyn, but with MUCH smaller grids.
Lawrence Glasser - 03 Jan 2004 15:43 GMT > No, it is not the harder way. Cab drivers using one all the time is making life > harder for everyone else who has to watch out for you lunatics who never meet a [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > think cab drivers are the top five list of things that should not exist you > would be correct. Bad cab ride, huh Jefe?
It's not the job, or job title, that commands respect, it's the person.
Your comments have pretty much locked you in for the No Respect Award in this newsgroup.
Larry
Chris Russell - 03 Jan 2004 15:53 GMT I have been in Manhattan a number of times in my 18-wheeler and the biggest problem is the yellow taxis that fly around ignoring every traffic law. 20-30 mph over the limit on the avenues (2d, 3d, 4th, etc), cutting right in front and stopping at the curb, stopping from 50 mph (w/o brake lights) double parked to pick someone up (he did this after first cutting in front of me than jamming on the brake-luckily I could quickly swing the trailer into the next lane, but that had my heart thumping. So, you can see that I'm not too keen on NYC cabbies using cell phones (besides it is against the law in NY without a hands free device).
Chris Please respond in the newsgroup
> > No, it is not the harder way. Cab drivers using one all the time is making life > > harder for everyone else who has to watch out for you lunatics who never meet a [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Larry Lawrence Glasser - 03 Jan 2004 16:34 GMT > I have been in Manhattan a number of times in my 18-wheeler and the biggest > problem is the yellow taxis that fly around ignoring every traffic law. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I'm not too keen on NYC cabbies using cell phones (besides it is against the > law in NY without a hands free device). I'm sure that anyone who's driven in NYC has a plethora of bad-cabbie stories.
But, in my opinion, Jefe went a bit overboard in voicing his distaste.
(Slightly off the subject, I'm still not clear why *everyone* doesn't opt for some type of hands-free device.)
Larry
Jud Hardcastle - 03 Jan 2004 18:44 GMT > I have been in Manhattan a number of times in my 18-wheeler and the biggest > problem is the yellow taxis that fly around ignoring every traffic law. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I'm not too keen on NYC cabbies using cell phones (besides it is against the > law in NY without a hands free device). Can't believe I've read thru this entire thread. I had no idea NYC cabbies were using cell phones like that. That puts a whole different light on the request. And not a very good one.
Free Nights&Weekends were originally introduced because the carriers had their entire system pretty much unused at night -- sitting idle -- and so made it available free for non-peaktime use. That doesn't appear to be the case in NYC -- if most cabbies are doing that then the cell system must be heavily loaded at night. If it's MORE loaded at night -- ie night IS peak use -- then the carriers are having to plan capacity based on night rather than day -- even though the night users are getting free airtime. Even if night is 2/3 day there is still a lot more upkeep costs than if night was 1/20 or 1/100 of day use. FREE isn't FREE -- the cost is just included in the base rate and minute rates. So guess who's paying for the free ride? Everyone--but based on total minutes used the "normal" users who aren't using excessive N&W minutes are getting overcharged bigtime. I'm surprised NYC carriers haven't dropped free N&W totally or at least cut the free minutes back to a number that average users wouldn't exceed but would make the excessive users anteup the cost.
I'm also surprised that news article didn't point that out -- in 2" headlines -- "CELLULAR USERS PAY FOR CABBIES CHATTING".
 Signature Jud Dallas TX USA
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 03 Jan 2004 18:55 GMT > and the biggest > problem is the yellow taxis that fly around ignoring every traffic law. > 20-30 mph over the limit on the avenues (2d, 3d, 4th, etc), cutting right in > front and stopping at the curb, stopping from 50 mph (w/o brake lights) > double parked to pick someone up (he did this after first cutting in front > of me than jamming on the brake Modern cabs are just little cocoons of the third world, on wheels.
Eljefe - 03 Jan 2004 18:40 GMT > > No, it is not the harder way. Cab drivers using one all the time is making life > > harder for everyone else who has to watch out for you lunatics who never meet a [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Larry No Larry, it was not a bad cab ride at all. I drive in Manhattan every day to get to my business. I am so glad that you have appointed yourself as the spokesman for the group to announce who shall receive what award. May I guess that you were awarded the arrogant jerk award ?
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 03 Jan 2004 10:36 GMT > > Ah, what did cabbies do before cell phones. > > > > It all worked out. > > Did it really? Just because the Earth did not crash into the sun does not > mean "it all worked out." Yes, it did. That YOU can't make it work out is a failing on your part.
Carl. - 03 Jan 2004 17:28 GMT > > > Ah, what did cabbies do before cell phones. > > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Yes, it did. That YOU can't make it work out is a failing on your part. What the heck are you talking about?
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 03 Jan 2004 18:54 GMT > > Yes, it did. That YOU can't make it work out is a failing on your part. > > What the heck are you talking about? He claims that it's "impossible" to be a cabbie without a cell phone.
Since cabbies were around LONG before cell phone service, I say he's wrong. And he is.
That he thinks he NEEDS a cell phone, is a failing on his part.
Carl. - 04 Jan 2004 05:32 GMT > > > Yes, it did. That YOU can't make it work out is a failing on your part. > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > That he thinks he NEEDS a cell phone, is a failing on his part. But you replied to my post containing a different statement.
Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 06:15 GMT >> > Yes, it did. That YOU can't make it work out is a failing on your part.
>> What the heck are you talking about?
>He claims that it's "impossible" to be a cabbie without a cell phone.
>Since cabbies were around LONG before cell phone service, I say he's >wrong. And he is. Check the difference between "were" and "are". Things change.
Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 06:14 GMT >> > Ah, what did cabbies do before cell phones.
>> > It all worked out.
>> Did it really? Just because the Earth did not crash into the sun does not >> mean "it all worked out."
>Yes, it did. That YOU can't make it work out is a failing on your part. First of all, cabs in NYC have had two-way radios for over 40 years, so most of the cabbies driving today didn't do anything before they had some form of communications in their cabs because they were either too young or not yet born.
SA - 02 Jan 2004 11:00 GMT > Well all minutes are rounded to the next one. Also I have conference calls. > 83 hours wane away sooner than you think. The reason why I prefer T-Mobile [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > is pretty stable. Cingular is stable enough but does become bandwidth > strapped in the 9PM to 10PM window. SO IT SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ONLY OPTION IS CINGULAR OR TMOBILE. SO GET A 9PM PLAN WITH MORE MINUTES FROM TMOBILE, OR GET MULTIPLE LINES FROM CINGULAR.
> Sprint is really a network that DOES not work well in NYC. I have day time > shift friends that have unlimited SPRINT PCS to SPRINT PCS calling but then [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > Jud > > Dallas TX USA David S - 03 Jan 2004 17:41 GMT >> Well all minutes are rounded to the next one. Also I have conference calls. >> 83 hours wane away sooner than you think. The reason why I prefer T-Mobile [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >SO IT SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ONLY OPTION IS CINGULAR OR TMOBILE. SO GET A 9PM >PLAN WITH MORE MINUTES FROM TMOBILE, OR GET MULTIPLE LINES FROM CINGULAR. Do you really mean to SHOUT at him? (If so, why?) Or are you just to stupid to turn off your caps lock key and/or too lazy to hit shift when appropriate?
- David Streeter, "an internet god" -- Dave Barry http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time. "When I was in prison, I was wrapped up in all those deep books. That Tolstoy crap. People shouldn't read that stuff." - Mike Tyson (who gave up Tolstoy for comic books)
Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 06:19 GMT [piggybacking]
>>SO IT SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ONLY OPTION IS CINGULAR OR TMOBILE. SO GET A 9PM >>PLAN WITH MORE MINUTES FROM TMOBILE, OR GET MULTIPLE LINES FROM CINGULAR. Cingular has no native presence in NYC.
Todd Allcock - 04 Jan 2004 06:49 GMT > [piggybacking] > >>SO IT SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ONLY OPTION IS CINGULAR OR TMOBILE. SO GET A 9PM > >>PLAN WITH MORE MINUTES FROM TMOBILE, OR GET MULTIPLE LINES FROM CINGULAR. > > Cingular has no native presence in NYC. From the customer's standpoint, that's irrelevant. Since Cingular uses the T-Mobile build-out, and we know from his posts that Roopinder has excellent coverage with Cingular, it goes to reason he'd have the same coverage with T-Mobile.
Now, if he doesn't mind "juggling" phones, he could add a T-Mo phone with the cheapest plan that offers unlimited N&W ($39.99 for 600 peak, unlimited off-peak) and use his 5000 N&W Cingular minutes between 7PM and 9PM (120 minutes/day * 30 days = 3600 night minutes) and then switch to the T-Mo phone from 9PM-7AM (unlimited.) He could probably even get the same model phone from T-Mo to reuse his cigar-lighter cord, handsfree, etc.
Now that we've solved Roop's problem for an extra $40/month, can we let this stupid thread die? ;-)
danny burstein - 04 Jan 2004 07:01 GMT >Now, if he doesn't mind "juggling" phones, he could add a T-Mo phone with >the cheapest plan that offers unlimited N&W ($39.99 for 600 peak, unlimited >off-peak) and use his 5000 N&W Cingular minutes between 7PM and 9PM (120 >minutes/day * 30 days = 3600 night minutes) and then switch to the T-Mo >phone from 9PM-7AM (unlimited.) He could probably even get the same model >phone from T-Mo to reuse his cigar-lighter cord, handsfree, etc. doesn't even need a complete phone. just a SIM card.
And if he opts for t-mobile's "three day weekend" plan that'll give him from 00:01 Friday -> 23:59 Sunday as an unlimited usage period. He loses the other weekday nights in the tradeoff, but can get them back (starting at 21:00, alas) for an extra $5 /month.
 Signature _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb@panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
Chris Russell - 04 Jan 2004 14:42 GMT T-Mobile also has 3day weekend plans w/ free nights-check their website.
Chris Please respond in the newsgroup
> >Now, if he doesn't mind "juggling" phones, he could add a T-Mo phone with > >the cheapest plan that offers unlimited N&W ($39.99 for 600 peak, unlimited [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > the other weekday nights in the tradeoff, but can get them back (starting > at 21:00, alas) for an extra $5 /month. Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 23:48 GMT >Now, if he doesn't mind "juggling" phones, he could add a T-Mo phone with >the cheapest plan that offers unlimited N&W ($39.99 for 600 peak, unlimited >off-peak) and use his 5000 N&W Cingular minutes between 7PM and 9PM (120 >minutes/day * 30 days = 3600 night minutes) and then switch to the T-Mo >phone from 9PM-7AM (unlimited.) He could probably even get the same model >phone from T-Mo to reuse his cigar-lighter cord, handsfree, etc. Or he could use a single phone and swap cards.
David S - 04 Jan 2004 19:43 GMT On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 17:41:33 GMT, I <me> chose to add this to the great equation of life, the universe, and everything:
>Or are you just to stupid Aaaarrrrgghh!!!!!!! I made a "to/too" error.
Now I'll have to go out and shovel snow to atone for it.
 Signature David Streeter, "an internet god" -- Dave Barry http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time. "You look like death on a Triscuit." - Zoe Bartlet to Josh Lyman
Mike - 02 Jan 2004 15:27 GMT > Well all minutes are rounded to the next one. Also I have conference calls. > 83 hours wane away sooner than you think. The reason why I prefer T-Mobile [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > tell you the street address. Phones do help here. Also when you are lost in > NJ or CT that same phone comes to your aid. So, I'm very curious. Where the hell do you take these people? -mike
Roopinder Randhawa - 03 Jan 2004 12:59 GMT Well since you asked that question:
I have to either call up their home. They tell the street address in postal format which is pretty difficult to find on the map just in one "red light" if it is unknown to me. So you end up calling the INFONE service. They tell you or SMS the directions to your cellphone.
Or worst they hand me their ID cards at times and really fall asleep. The ID card says the address.
Then again on the cell phone to find the address if it is unknown to me. Worst comes up you have to tell them to vacate the cab or call an NYPD officer to do that when they fail to comply. Use again use a cellphone to dial the "NINE ONE ONE".
Also I do not talk all the time on the phone. It is just on. Like a hotline. Some problem or thought that crosses my mind and I speak into it in my own language or English as need may be. Like a CB but limited in content distribution and radio-static.
It really is a great tool for me and all other cabbies alike.
> > Well all minutes are rounded to the next one. Also I have conference calls. > > 83 hours wane away sooner than you think. The reason why I prefer T-Mobile [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > So, I'm very curious. Where the hell do you take these people? > -mike Elmo P. Shagnasty - 03 Jan 2004 13:33 GMT > Also I do not talk all the time on the phone. It is just on. Like a hotline. > Some problem or thought that crosses my mind and I speak into it in my own > language or English as need may be. Like a CB but limited in content > distribution and radio-static. Dude, you need Nextel.
Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 06:18 GMT >> Also I do not talk all the time on the phone. It is just on. Like a hotline. >> Some problem or thought that crosses my mind and I speak into it in my own >> language or English as need may be. Like a CB but limited in content >> distribution and radio-static.
>Dude, you need Nextel. Only if every cabbie in the city was in his group.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 04 Jan 2004 10:17 GMT > >Dude, you need Nextel. > > Only if every cabbie in the city was in his group. Nextel no longer requires that people be in the same group. You can radio *anyone* in the country now.
Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 23:47 GMT >> >Dude, you need Nextel.
>> Only if every cabbie in the city was in his group.
>Nextel no longer requires that people be in the same group. You can >radio *anyone* in the country now. I can do the same thing on any carrier, and with PTT on Verizon (and Sprint?).
AL - 03 Jan 2004 22:10 GMT Verizon and Nextel both have some unlimited nights and weekend options. I think Cingular has an option where you can buy additional night and weekend minute or mobile to mobile, which might cover some your use.
AL
> Well since you asked that question: > Also I do not talk all the time on the phone. It is just on. Like a hotline. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > It really is a great tool for me and all other cabbies alike. Anon - 03 Jan 2004 22:18 GMT > Verizon and Nextel both have some unlimited nights and weekend options. > I think Cingular has an option where you can buy additional night and > weekend minute or mobile to mobile, which might cover some your use. > > AL I was tempted to buy mobile to mobile minutes from Cingular, but the way they define mobile to mobile is a real rip-off. IMHO First, you need to understand that we have the nationwide GSM plan from Cingular with no roaming and no long-distance. At least 50% of our calls originate on the cingular network, but outside our "home area". Mobile to mobile minutes only kick in if both cell phones are physically located within your home area, which (in our case) would almost never happen. We opted for more anytime minutes instead, partly to cover anticipated mobile to mobile (but usually OUTSIDE the home area) use. Even though it was more expensive to do that, it's still a better deal than mobile to mobile minutes which are practically impossible to use. If you are both "home", then why the heck are you calling each other anyway? :) -Dave
Al Klein - 04 Jan 2004 06:17 GMT >I have to either call up their home. They tell the street address in postal >format which is pretty difficult to find on the map just in one "red light" >if it is unknown to me. So you end up calling the INFONE service. They tell >you or SMS the directions to your cellphone. Wait a few years. Eventually you'll know any address you can understand.
Roopinder Randhawa - 05 Jan 2004 09:12 GMT Only the customer needs to spell it out :))
> >I have to either call up their home. They tell the street address in postal > >format which is pretty difficult to find on the map just in one "red light" [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Wait a few years. Eventually you'll know any address you can > understand. Peterbilt - 05 Jan 2004 12:29 GMT I really think he needs a GPS so all he needs to do is type in the address and it will pop up then give him directions.
> Only the customer needs to spell it out :)) > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Wait a few years. Eventually you'll know any address you can > > understand. Al Klein - 06 Jan 2004 05:26 GMT On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:29:10 -0500, "Peterbilt" <amazon-bitch@REMOVETHISeudoramail.com> posted to alt.cellular.verizon:
>I really think he needs a GPS so all he needs to do is type in the address >and it will pop up then give him directions. A GPS receiver connected to a laptop running Streets and Trips. Type in the address and the map will center on it, zoomed in.
Actually, a good cab driver wouldn't even need the GPS receiver.
Peterbilt - 06 Jan 2004 10:38 GMT They have them for Palm devices as well.
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:29:10 -0500, "Peterbilt" > <amazon-bitch@REMOVETHISeudoramail.com> posted to [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Actually, a good cab driver wouldn't even need the GPS receiver. Al Klein - 08 Jan 2004 03:06 GMT On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 05:38:39 -0500, "Peterbilt" <amazon-bitch@REMOVETHISeudoramail.com> posted to alt.cellular.verizon:
>> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:29:10 -0500, "Peterbilt" >> <amazon-bitch@REMOVETHISeudoramail.com> posted to >> alt.cellular.verizon:
>> >I really think he needs a GPS so all he needs to do is type in the address >> >and it will pop up then give him directions.
>> A GPS receiver connected to a laptop running Streets and Trips. Type >> in the address and the map will center on it, zoomed in.
>> Actually, a good cab driver wouldn't even need the GPS receiver.
>They have them for Palm devices as well. A good driver can drive the map - laptop, PDA, it doesn't make any difference.
Roopinder Randhawa - 08 Jan 2004 10:51 GMT There are so many streets in NYC and adjoining areaqs that you NEED a device.
Also, I wanted cellphone service NOT GPS :)
Also computers are not very sensitive to street congestion, and factors of traffic and traffic light co-ordination/syncronization. So those directions are of less use.
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 05:38:39 -0500, "Peterbilt" > <amazon-bitch@REMOVETHISeudoramail.com> posted to [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > A good driver can drive the map - laptop, PDA, it doesn't make any > difference. Al Klein - 09 Jan 2004 03:42 GMT >Also computers are not very sensitive to street congestion, and factors of >traffic and traffic light co-ordination/syncronization. So those directions >are of less use. If you contact the Transportation Department you might be able to find out which streets are timed in which direction at what times. That might be good information to have.
zwerl1 - 03 Jan 2004 02:45 GMT > Well all minutes are rounded to the next one. Also I have conference calls. > 83 hours wane away sooner than you think. The reason why I prefer T-Mobile [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > tell you the street address. Phones do help here. Also when you are lost in > NJ or CT that same phone comes to your aid. Might be a good idea for you to consider getting one of those portable GPS navigation systems - they're not too expensive and work well.
thunder - 01 Jan 2004 18:03 GMT > Working in the night time is good and as Cingular offers 7 PM N&W I am > interested in it. But when I called CS they said the limit is strictly 5000 > and that is only 83 hours and 20 minutes. I use that much in 1 week. > Additional minutes are 45 cents each. > > There is no work around for this according to CS. That sucks. Not try to be a smart a.s, but why are you posting a question on Cingular plans on a sprint news group ??
Al Klein - 01 Jan 2004 22:58 GMT >> Working in the night time is good and as Cingular offers 7 PM N&W I am >> interested in it. But when I called CS they said the limit is strictly 5000 >> and that is only 83 hours and 20 minutes. I use that much in 1 week. >> Additional minutes are 45 cents each.
>> There is no work around for this according to CS. That sucks.
>Not try to be a smart a.s, but why are you posting a question on Cingular >plans on a sprint news group ?? It was posted to alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon and alt.cellular.voicestream. I guess he's looking for recommendations.
Roopinder, have you checked with Verizon? Good coverage and I've never heard of a limit to the unlimited feature.
Roopinder Randhawa - 02 Jan 2004 09:21 GMT I have VZW but they do not offer 7 PM. I like their service and it is great in all of the city But the 7 PM makes a lot of difference. I do work 7 days a week 12 hours shifts.
> >> Working in the night time is good and as Cingular offers 7 PM N&W I am > >> interested in it. But when I called CS they said the limit is strictly 5000 [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Roopinder, have you checked with Verizon? Good coverage and I've > never heard of a limit to the unlimited feature. Carl. - 06 Jan 2004 06:28 GMT I missed the original post, but the reason Verizon limits off peak to a certain number is so they can have their stupid signs that say "5500 minutes for $55" or whatever the amount is. They LOVE to do that. I see their family plans are finally including unlimited m-2-m, but it used to be limited when I was [gulp] selling it. Then they have a nice poster with anytime, off-peak, and m2m minutes all added up for a nice big number.
They also once went through a long process of periodically increasing the minutes so they could have a "new" offer. It went from 2000 to 3000 to 3200 to 4000 to 5000. Each time our store posters were given a "now with an extra xxx weekend minutes" sticker.
Todd Allcock - 03 Jan 2004 05:43 GMT > Roopinder, have you checked with Verizon? Good coverage and I've > never heard of a limit to the unlimited feature. Not picking on you Al (or Roopinder), but to set the record straight for others eavesdropping on this thread, Cingular does NOT refer to their N+W plans as "Unlimited". For as long as I can remember they've always had a limit (1000, 3000, or 5000 depending on the plan.)
Perhaps a bit misleadingly, they DO refer to them as "free nights and weekends".
Al Klein - 03 Jan 2004 22:47 GMT >> Roopinder, have you checked with Verizon? Good coverage and I've >> never heard of a limit to the unlimited feature.
>Not picking on you Al (or Roopinder), but to set the record straight >for others eavesdropping on this thread, Cingular does NOT refer to >their N+W plans as "Unlimited". For as long as I can remember they've >always had a limit (1000, 3000, or 5000 depending on the plan.)
>Perhaps a bit misleadingly, they DO refer to them as "free nights and >weekends". Then they also have free weekdays - just fewer hours. Like Sprint's "not cellular".
It's called "word of art". That's legalese for "lying legally".
Todd Allcock - 04 Jan 2004 06:38 GMT > >> Roopinder, have you checked with Verizon? Good coverage and I've > >> never heard of a limit to the unlimited feature. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > It's called "word of art". That's legalese for "lying legally". Fair enough. I was just pointing out that the whole premise of this staggeringly ridiculous thread, now well over 100 posts, was a misconception to begin with.
Central - 07 Jan 2004 07:33 GMT >> Roopinder, have you checked with Verizon? Good coverage and I've >> never heard of a limit to the unlimited feature. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Perhaps a bit misleadingly, they DO refer to them as "free nights and > weekends". Actually they did. Around 2000 I signed up with cingular and utilized their data services to keep in contact with my remote toys. At the time they utilized mins for the tdma data calls. I specificly signed up with a unlimited nights and weekend package starting at 9pm ending at 7am since the only time I would need to use a cell link to talk to my equipment was when I was away/traveling which would usually be on weekends or wait till I got to where I was going and could make my calls at 9pm.
David S - 03 Jan 2004 06:05 GMT >>> Working in the night time is good and as Cingular offers 7 PM N&W I am >>> interested in it. But when I called CS they said the limit is strictly 5000 [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >>Not try to be a smart a.s, but why are you posting a question on Cingular >>plans on a sprint news group ?? Funny, but I was wondering why he was asking a Cingular question in the Verizon group.
>It was posted to alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, >alt.cellular.verizon and alt.cellular.voicestream. I guess he's >looking for recommendations. > >Roopinder, have you checked with Verizon? Good coverage and I've >never heard of a limit to the unlimited feature. But he wants the 7 PM thing.
- David Streeter, "an internet god" -- Dave Barry http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time. "Timeline! This is not the time to argue about time! We don't have the time." - Deanna Troi, drunk
Al Klein - 03 Jan 2004 22:48 GMT >>>> Working in the night time is good and as Cingular offers 7 PM N&W I am >>>> interested in it. But when I called CS they said the limit is strictly 5000 [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > >But he wants the 7 PM thing. I want 7AM - 7AM. One takes what works best for one. 7PM and limited minutes, 7PM, unlimited minutes and poor coverage or 9 PM, unlimited minutes and good coverage.
Chris Russell - 01 Jan 2004 18:09 GMT You are right that Cingular limits NW mins to 5000/line. You could solve that by getting two separate Cingular phones. That would get you 10,000 NW mins/month. With Sprint, you can get an area-wide plan for $45 with 1000 anytime and unlimited NW starting at 9 pm.-7pm start for $5/mo. You could try SPCS for 14 days, but you only get the phone cost back-you would still have to pay for activation and service. Nextel is also an option-they have some unlimited NW plans that start at 9pm. They have a 15 day trial period with additional conditions. T-Mobile has national plans that have unlimited Fri, Sat, Sun all day and unlimited Mon, Tues, Wed, Thu from 9pm. You would have a 14 day trial period. Hope some of this can help you.
Chris Please respond on Usenet in the newsgroup Happy New Year!
> I am an NYC Taxi driver and cell phone forms an integral part of my life as > it keeps me sane during traffic jams, bad customer, telling what airport is [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Any recommendations. Peter Pan - 01 Jan 2004 22:02 GMT > I am an NYC Taxi driver and cell phone forms an integral part of my life as > it keeps me sane during traffic jams, bad customer, telling what airport is [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Any recommendations. What's the matter with Verizon? What you said doesn't surprise me one bit, wait until you find out that for the "free" time on sprint you have to pay $10 a month. (their idea of free is not my idea of free!)
Bob Smith - 01 Jan 2004 22:17 GMT <snipped>
> What's the matter with Verizon? What you said doesn't surprise me one bit, > wait until you find out that for the "free" time on sprint you have to pay > $10 a month. (their idea of free is not my idea of free!) Only for those accounts already established, and who don't have N&W minutes on their plans. N & W minutes are included with the new plans. If one wants to drop it down to 7:00 PM, it would cost them $5 more along with a 2 yr. annual agreement.
Bob
Justin - 01 Jan 2004 22:26 GMT Bob Smith wrote on [Thu, 01 Jan 2004 22:17:39 GMT]:
> <snipped> > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > to drop it down to 7:00 PM, it would cost them $5 more along with a 2 yr. > annual agreement. It's $7 here
Steven J Sobol - 01 Jan 2004 22:24 GMT In alt.cellular.verizon Peter Pan <Marcs1102NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What's the matter with Verizon? What you said doesn't surprise me one bit, > wait until you find out that for the "free" time on sprint you have to pay > $10 a month. (their idea of free is not my idea of free!) $5. Not $10.
 Signature JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950 Steve Sobol, Geek In Charge * 888.480.4NET (4638) * sjsobol@JustThe.net
Peter Pan - 01 Jan 2004 22:40 GMT > In alt.cellular.verizon Peter Pan <Marcs1102NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > $5. Not $10. So you can charge someone $5 a month and still call it free but $10 a month isn't? I say ANY amount, even 1 cent makes it not free and the ads lie.
Bob Smith - 01 Jan 2004 22:58 GMT > > In alt.cellular.verizon Peter Pan <Marcs1102NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > So you can charge someone $5 a month and still call it free but $10 a month > isn't? I say ANY amount, even 1 cent makes it not free and the ads lie. Free and Clear isn't meant to be Free ... If it was, then there wouldn't be any charge for any plan ... It's means that one is FREE to go around the country in SPCS's system, and make CLEAR calls.
Bob
Peter Pan - 01 Jan 2004 23:52 GMT > > > In alt.cellular.verizon Peter Pan <Marcs1102NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Bob What is your problem? too much champagne on new years eve? they Claim Free unlimited nights and weekends in their TV and print ads, the ads and these posts don't say ANYTHING anout some plan called "free and clear"!!!!
Bob Smith - 02 Jan 2004 00:24 GMT > > > > In alt.cellular.verizon Peter Pan <Marcs1102NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > unlimited nights and weekends in their TV and print ads, the ads and these > posts don't say ANYTHING anout some plan called "free and clear"!!!! Peter, What is your problem? When was the last time you looked at the plans offered by SPCS? If you haven't been to the site in a while, I'd recommend you do so, as unlimited N & W minutes are included in ALL their plans. Here's the link ... plug in your zip code to check it out. www.sprintpcs.com .
SPCS is advertising they have plans with Unlimited N & W from 9:00PM to 7:00AM weekdays and all weekend long. Just who do you think they are advertising too? Current customers? Maybe, but it's more to new potential customers who either don't have any cell service right now, or have service with another wireless provider.
If one originally bought a SPCS plan that did not include N & W minutes as an option, then they can ... for a cost as they can with any option with any wireless carrier will cost additional money, or the SPCS customer can change their plan to one of the new ones offered by SPCS and get it included with whatever AT plan they pick ... at no additional expense.
If one wants to expand their N & W minutes to start at 7:00PM, it costs $5 more a month. Get it now?
BTW, the original explanation of what I said is absolutely correct. Since 98 when I signed up with SPCS, I could make calls anywhere in the country on SPCS's system, where I wouldn't spend additional funds on roaming out of my home area.
Bob
Steven J Sobol - 02 Jan 2004 00:28 GMT In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Bob Smith <usirsclt_NoSpam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Peter, What is your problem? When was the last time you looked at the plans > offered by SPCS? If you haven't been to the site in a while, I'd recommend > you do so, as unlimited N & W minutes are included in ALL their plans. > Here's the link ... plug in your zip code to check it out. www.sprintpcs.com You pay extra for earlier N&W minutes though, and I believe that is what he is referring to. I'm sure you've seen *those* ads.
 Signature JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950 Steve Sobol, Geek In Charge * 888.480.4NET (4638) * sjsobol@JustThe.net
Bob Smith - 02 Jan 2004 01:22 GMT > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Bob Smith <usirsclt_NoSpam_@earthlink.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > You pay extra for earlier N&W minutes though, and I believe that is what > he is referring to. I'm sure you've seen *those* ads. Ah ... no I haven't.
Bob
Peter Pan - 02 Jan 2004 01:50 GMT > > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Bob Smith <usirsclt_NoSpam_@earthlink.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Bob Actually I use a verizon phone now, got rid of my sprint phone when I quit working for sprint. I have just seen those (IMO misleading TV ads) with the screaming college students being told that sprints free nights now start at 7, and the "special offers" section has (in the first box on the page) "Unlimited Night Minutes starting at 7 PM", but when you click the link and look at the plans it says "Night and Weekend Minutes (starting at 9 PM)". Sounds misleading to me, and since I work at a place that sells verizon now, we constantly have people coming in wanting verizon to match the claims by sprint in their ads on TV. I have to constantly explain that the TV ads lie. It's annoying.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 02 Jan 2004 03:25 GMT > I have just seen those (IMO misleading TV ads) with the screaming > college students being told that sprints free nights now start at 7, and the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > people coming in wanting verizon to match the claims by sprint in their ads > on TV. I have to constantly explain that the TV ads lie. No, they don't lie.
Sprint simply isn't changing their main rate plan page just to reflect a temporary promotion. But if you go to Sprint by 1/3/04 to get a phone and a plan, you'll get 7pm nights and weekends at no extra charge. If you go after that, they'll charge you five bucks a month to get it down to 7pm--and the promotional verbiage on their web site will go away.
Jesus. You actually tell people that Sprint is lying just because their front page says one thing but their relatively static plans page says another?
And people BELIEVE you? If they do, they get what they deserve. If you honestly think Sprint is lying, you're a moron.
Chris Russell - 02 Jan 2004 21:07 GMT If you could read the fine print at the bottom of the screen on the commercial, you would see that free &pm nights are only on area-wide plans for 1000 hours, share a phone for $50 (also clearly spelled out on the link at spritpcs.com). Current customers must pay an additional fee. As to "Night and Weekend Minutes (starting at 9 PM)"-you forgot the "unless otherwise stated in the plan". If you don't want to read the whole info, don't make misleading statements.
Chris Please Respond in the Newsgroup
> Actually I use a verizon phone now, got rid of my sprint phone when I quit > working for sprint. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > people coming in wanting verizon to match the claims b |
|