 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Manufacturers / Ericsson / April 2004T630 bad camera
Yesterday there was a test on dutch TV concerning phonecamera's. The camera of the T630 was rated worst. The Nokia 6600 came out as the best camera. On the other hand the functionality of the T630 was rated as the best. Yes, the camera of the T630 is just a toy, as in most cell phones;-) But OTOH, IMHO the T630 is one of the nicest phones I had so far, in many aspects a real successor of the Siemens SL45, which I used before. Not too many design gimmicks, a serious keyboard, an extremely good display, and more. There are only few phones with a really good camera: One is the Sharp GX-20, which has a cam with VGA resolution, and kinda 'flash' light. Of course the GX-30 is even better (1 MegaPix), but the pictures of my wife's GX-20 are still better than with most other phone cams I saw so far. However, for taking photos I prefer my Caplio G3S (3,2 MPix). That's the starting point for reasonable digital photos;-) Raymond > Yesterday there was a test on dutch TV concerning phonecamera's. The camera > of the T630 was rated worst. The Nokia 6600 came out as the best camera. > > On the other hand the functionality of the T630 was rated as the best. On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:19:25 +0200, "Raymond Del Tondo" <RDelT@gmx.de> wrote some stuff about "Re: T630 bad camera", to which I would like to add the following: >Yes, the camera of the T630 is just a toy, It's not even a toy.. ;-) Toys tend to mostly do what they're advertised to do. ;-) Now the camera in the 6600, THATS a toy! ;-) Cheers, Chanchao >Yes, the camera of the T630 is just a toy, >as in most cell phones;-) So is the T630 that much better than the T610?? T610's are starting to be very cheap or free on contract, whereas the t630 is too new for that, but I wonder if its worth paying, or waiting. Andrew replying? delete killspam from @aol.com******** and shoot any spammers you meet ;-) >[..] > So is the T630 that much better than the T610?? > T610's are starting to be very cheap or free on contract, whereas the t630 is > too new for that, but I wonder if its worth paying, or waiting. I must admit that I couldn't wait to get it, so I bought a T-branded for nearly 300 Euros, and it works fine with my D2 card. And yes, the T630 is *much* better than the T610 in some aspects: It has a much better display, it has a better keyboard (IMHO), it's smaller and has less weight, and it looks much better than a T610, also IMHO;-) However, if you can wait a bit, the K700 could be an alternative. At least the K700 has a better cam and more RAM... So when the K700 will be available, I guess the T630 will get cheaper soon. Raymond Hi, >However, if you can wait a bit, >the K700 could be an alternative. >At least the K700 has a better cam and more RAM... not to forget the upcoming z700 with a real 1.3MPixel-Cam and a FLASH. C U Sushii Raymond Del Tondo - typed: >> [..] >> So is the T630 that much better than the T610?? [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Raymond At least my T610 will display photos from my digicam better than those taken natively which are basically crap. I'll await the S700 with some interest, also takes Memory Sticks.  SignatureThe map is not the territory >>Yes, the camera of the T630 is just a toy, >>as in most cell phones;-) > >So is the T630 that much better than the T610?? >T610's are starting to be very cheap or free on contract, whereas the t630 is >too new for that, but I wonder if its worth paying, or waiting. They're the same, apart from the design and the screen. The T630 screen you can also read during the day. ;-) Cheers, Chanchao > Yes, the camera of the T630 is just a toy, > as in most cell phones;-) [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > of my wife's GX-20 are still better than with most other phone cams I > saw so far. The Motorola V600 camera takes pretty good pics at 640x480. >Yes, the camera of the T630 is just a toy, >as in most cell phones;-) > >However, for taking photos I prefer my Caplio G3S (3,2 MPix). >That's the starting point for reasonable digital photos;-) Pricisely!! Phones are for making telephone calls - cameras are for taking photos - can you imagine looking at a camera and asking "How good are the voice calls on this?" Yes - phone cameras are a nice bit of fun - but *really*, lets not get too serious!!! :-) Tym >- can you imagine looking at a camera and asking "How good are the >voice calls on this?" YES! As well as asking if it also supports IMAP in addition to POP3 for email. ;-) >Yes - phone cameras are a nice bit of fun - but *really*, lets not get >too serious!!! :-) Right. Have been some cases though when I was happy to be able to take a quick picture. (3650) After some Photoshopping you have a fighting chance of turning some of the pictures into an acceptable 350x200-something picture for email or web. Depends on what's pictured though; works best when the image is evenly lit, no big differences in lighting. Cheers, Chanchao |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.