Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Fido / July 2005
Long distance price doubles
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Alex - 07 Jul 2005 23:26 GMT New long distance rates as of August 3, 2005: 20 cents / minute.... how unfortunate.
ChickenBall - 08 Jul 2005 00:17 GMT Alex <Alex@UpNorthInTheIgloo.ca> wrote in group: alt.cellular.fido
> New long distance rates as of August 3, 2005: 20 cents / minute.... how > unfortunate. Why do you seem suprised? Fido was destined to slowly be dismantled when Rogers bought it. Shame.
Joseph - 08 Jul 2005 01:09 GMT >Alex <Alex@UpNorthInTheIgloo.ca> wrote in group: alt.cellular.fido > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Why do you seem suprised? Fido was destined to slowly be dismantled when >Rogers bought it. Shame. Next thing to go: per second billing for monthly subscribers.
- -
JF Mezei - 08 Jul 2005 03:13 GMT > Next thing to go: per second billing for monthly subscribers. Not sure about that. They still advertise Fido as being the only one with pr second billing.
Also, this would apply only to new subscribers, not existing ones, especially those under contract. They can mess with all the anciliary services and that applies to all existing subscribers right away.
I am not sure Fido is attracting that many new subscribers. So their changes would probably aim to extract more money from existing subscribers.
Alex - 09 Jul 2005 13:00 GMT > I am not sure Fido is attracting that many new subscribers. So their > changes would probably aim to extract more money from existing > subscribers. I know of at least one new subscriber: my boss, who got so pi$$ed off about being charged 95 cents per minute on US long distance! He told Rogers to shove it after receiving a bill for over $500 following a recent trip to the US. Of course, I told him the reprieve would be temporary....
Rogers even wanted to drop the bill to something like $150! Didn't know you could negotiate with them.
JF Mezei - 09 Jul 2005 18:04 GMT > I know of at least one new subscriber: my boss, who got so pi$$ed off about > being charged 95 cents per minute on US long distance! That is terrible.
I called Fido yesterday to complain about the 100% increase in long distance rates. Told him that I would make sure that Rogers ends up making less money from me, doing exactly the opposite of what they wanted. I'll buy pre paid long distrance cards and change all my address book entries to remove the +1 so that any call that is long distrance will result in fido telling me the call is long distance and not connecting me.
ChickenBall - 09 Jul 2005 23:34 GMT JF Mezei <jfmezei.spoamnot@teksavvy.com> wrote in group: alt.cellular.fido
> I called Fido yesterday to complain about the 100% increase in long > distance rates. Told him that I would make sure that Rogers ends up [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > distrance will result in fido telling me the call is long distance and > not connecting me. Wow, you called Fido. Was it a one sided conversation? I don't see you posting what they said in return.
 Signature Remove the "spam" to reply in email.
http://www.chickenball.net Affordable Web Hosting
sbdot - 11 Jul 2005 15:40 GMT Actually, if you read the contract, I'm sure that they've covered themselves for that. If not, expect a new 'User Agreement' to be mailed out that allows them to change whatever they want. If you don't like it, you can cancel.
That's the Rogers way of doing business... and once you cancel, they'll come after you for all kinds of dubious charges to try to squeeze a final few dollars out of you (thus ensuring that they'll leave you pissed off enough to never consider subscribing for anything with them again). That's why I don't allow any of their services in my home (I'm not writing this from home, in case any of you call me a hypocrite).
I was going to say it was a shame that they acquired Sprint Canada, but that company's service sucked as bad as Rogers did, so basically it was a good fit.
>>Next thing to go: per second billing for monthly subscribers. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > I am not sure Fido is attracting that many new subscribers. So their changes > would probably aim to extract more money from existing subscribers. sbdot - 11 Jul 2005 15:33 GMT I guess however few people were actually paying the ridiculous rate of 10c/min weren't appreciated. I personally used to program a calling card into my phone when I had Fido (phone card rates are now 1.8-3.0c/min for LD in Canada/US... and I'm talking about the flat rate cards). But I got rid of that Fido problem a while ago now, so no worries for me. Stick a fork in Fido; that dog is done, despite all of Rogers protestations that they didn't buy it to kill it off.
> New long distance rates as of August 3, 2005: 20 cents / minute.... how > unfortunate. JF Mezei - 11 Jul 2005 19:03 GMT > I guess however few people were actually paying the ridiculous rate of > 10c/min weren't appreciated. Actually, long distance was used a lot. And remember that Fido even used to sell it for your landline. And remember that when you place a call from outside a city, you are never really sure if it will end up being long distance or not, unless it is extremely obvious (in québec calling someone in BC or in Australia).
So it was extremely convenient to be able to make calls at reasonable long distance rates equivalent to what Bell charges when you subscribe with some package incurring monthly fees. It wasn't designed to rip you off. It was acceptable.
But at 0.20, it is a ripoff and I will protest now by using a prepaid card. So in the end, Rogers will get less revenu from its long distance rate increase , and if every Fido customer did the same, Rogers might get the message.
Rogers should learn some tricks from the dog instead of the other way around. Right now, it is out to protect its own very high rates by cannabalising Fido rates. An in the end, the most feared competitor (Virgin) turns out to be just a new brand for Bell Mobility at roughly the same rates, so it isn't such a big threath after all.
It isn't a surprise that Rogers is wrecking Fido. But it is a disapointment that the lack of competition in Canada's wireless is allowing Rogers to wreck its oppportunity to compete against landlines. Then again, with VOIP, perhaps it isn't possible to compete against the new generation of landline service, so might as well milk customers while it lasts.
(with WiMax, expect VOIP based mobile phones, and that will definitely compete against traditional legacy mobile phone companies).
Louis Lavallée - 16 Jul 2005 15:17 GMT Hi!
I'm in Québec and I'm using Distributel for my long distance calls since a while. The Québec plan is 1200 minutes for 18.00$ and the minutes can be used with my home phone AND my cell phone. Every minutes over the limit is .05 $
>> I guess however few people were actually paying the ridiculous rate of >> 10c/min weren't appreciated. [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > (with WiMax, expect VOIP based mobile phones, and that will definitely compete > against traditional legacy mobile phone companies). sbdot - 16 Jul 2005 16:28 GMT I use a flat rate long distance calling card. The rate is 1.9 cents per min, and you can get them in 5, 10 or 20 dollar amounts. That's why even when i had Fido (which, thankfully, I don't any longer) I never used their long distance. 10 cents a minute nowadays is even more than some of the Bell long distance plans. It may have been an OK rate a couple of years ago, but not today. 20 cents is just absolutely retarded. If anyone hasn't cancelled their Fido service after the rates were jacked up for most of the services (vmail, call id), plan minutes and features were gutted (hello CityFido), and now long distance rates have been doubled... then I guess they're just the type of clueless shlub that Rogers would like to maintain as a customer. "They'll pay whatever we ask. They're the bestest customers."
> Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] >> compete >> against traditional legacy mobile phone companies). Joseph - 16 Jul 2005 18:51 GMT >I use a flat rate long distance calling card. The rate is 1.9 cents per >min, and you can get them in 5, 10 or 20 dollar amounts. That's why [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >shlub that Rogers would like to maintain as a customer. "They'll pay >whatever we ask. They're the bestest customers." You evidently do not know that what Rogers is trying to do is to make the Fido service so unattractive that no one will use it and if they're already customers they'll force them to leave. I predict the next thing to go for Fido will be per second billing and after that an increase of US roaming from 20 cents per minute to 75 cents per minute. If there were any advantages to using Fido they're slowly being taken away. I would not be surprised to see Fido completely gone within two years. People were rooting for Fido to fail and their wishes are now coming true. Using the retarded "Andrea" for customer service is enough to make someone leave Fido. Whoever programmed that thing didn't have a clue. And evidently Fido doesn't realize that Canada is a dual language country since many of the announcements that they have on the service are in French only.
- -
Jim MacKenzie - 18 Jul 2005 15:59 GMT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.fido Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 11:51 AM Subject: Re: Long distance price doubles
> I predict the > next thing to go for Fido will be per second billing and after that an > increase of US roaming from 20 cents per minute to 75 cents per > minute. I guess you guys prefer paying $0.25 for long distance and $0.95 (plus $0.50 long distance) for US roaming then, because that's what Rogers charges and that's about what Telus, Bell, Aliant, MTS and SaskTel Mobility charge.
Jim
EggHead - 18 Jul 2005 17:51 GMT Hi, Does the LD package still exist after August3,? They are only .05 per min to Canada. Egghead
> New long distance rates as of August 3, 2005: 20 cents / minute.... how > unfortunate.
|
|
|