Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Fido / October 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Thoughts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Hugh G Rection - 24 Oct 2003 19:10 GMT
I could be wrong, and way off base on this one, but I would think twice before
tossing my landline for a fido based totally on the health concerns from using
cellular telephones. The jury is still out on this one. There are many
scientists that claim that extended use of wireless phones cause brain tumours.
Note that I said wireless, and not just cellular. Yup I am throwing the cordless
900, 2.4GHz and 5.6GHz home phones into this pile too.

Naturally every time a doctor or scientist goes on the record and says that they
have scientific data that links cancer to exposure to rf energy due to the
heating effect caused in the brain, some other industry sponcered scientist
rebuts the claim. Getting industry funded research is like getting the fox to
guard the hen house.  IMHO.
Now for a little personal insite on this. My cousin recently died of a brain
tumour. She was 50 years old, and the tumour was discovered after she bumped her
head and blacked out. (a routine CT scan was done) The tumour was formed
directly over her left ear. The exact spot that the antenna from her cellular
phone would have been.  She had been a heavy cell phone (and cordless phone)
user, Did not smoke, and did not drink, and lead what many would consider an
extremely healthy lifestyle. Her doctors told her that they highly suspected
that the cause of her tumour was exposure to radio energy from her cellular
phone.

Now that Fido is convincing many to dump their line lines, and go exclusively
wireless, with unlimited talk time, my fear is that we are going to see a big
jump in the cases of fatal brain tumours. Do I own a cell phone? Yes. Do I use
it? Yes as a matter of fact I do. But I do not use it as my primary phone, nor
do I own a cordless phone. The majority of the time I am using a corded phone.
The only time I use the cell phone is when I am on the road, and that averages
perhaps 5 minutes a day, so I am not too worried about my exposure, but I
certainly wouldn't be using wireless exclusively.
I warned my cousin 10 years ago about having 2 cell phones permamantly glued to
her ear, and unfortunately it fell on deaf ears.
JF Mezei - 24 Oct 2003 20:08 GMT
> I could be wrong, and way off base on this one, but I would think twice before
> tossing my landline for a fido based totally on the health concerns from using
> cellular telephones.

While this is a very valid concern, I think that the target market for the
citiphone isn't people who will spend 10 hours straight on the phone. It is
probably more for very mobile urban professionals.

Also, if you purchase a POTS-mobile interface, then you could plug a regular
phone into your mobile and then you wouldn't have any of the problems of
radiation in the head.

As a matter of fact, I could see a good potential for a mini-pbx based on a
cell phone holder near the door. Put the phone in the holder and your POTS
phones in your home are now activated and your cell phone acts as a
transmitter for your mini-pbx.

Before you leave, you pickup the phone from the holder and the home POTS
phones are deactivated and your phone is now a regular mobile phone.

Heck, for DINKS, they could have a dual phone holder supplying 2 phone lines
onto your home PBX. When the wife leaves in morning, she picks up the phone,
when the husband leaves his picks up his phone. (of course, for dinks, the
phone holder would have to be at the garage door because these people never
walk, they always take their yuppy cars and/or SUVs).
Alex - 25 Oct 2003 02:17 GMT
<...>

> Also, if you purchase a POTS-mobile interface, then you could plug a
> regular phone into your mobile and then you wouldn't have any of the
> problems of radiation in the head.

Something like this....?  

http://cellantenna.com/BaseStation/cellular_base_station.htm
repatch - 24 Oct 2003 21:32 GMT
Use a headset.

> I could be wrong, and way off base on this one, but I would think twice before
> tossing my landline for a fido based totally on the health concerns from using
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> I warned my cousin 10 years ago about having 2 cell phones permamantly glued to
> her ear, and unfortunately it fell on deaf ears.
twtwwtin - 24 Oct 2003 22:18 GMT
>Use a headset.

This is the same as main lining it ;-)
Shaun - 25 Oct 2003 06:34 GMT
What about bluetooth headsets.. Do they help at all in anyway or they just
as bad.

> >Use a headset.
>
> This is the same as main lining it ;-)
Jimbo - 25 Oct 2003 20:03 GMT
Maybe even worse :) Although a lower power transmitter , it's often closer
to the skull as it sits behind the ear.

> What about bluetooth headsets.. Do they help at all in anyway or they just
> as bad.
>
> > >Use a headset.
> >
> > This is the same as main lining it ;-)
xxrr - 25 Oct 2003 01:56 GMT
Um, Hands Free Kit???

> I could be wrong, and way off base on this one, but I would think twice before
> tossing my landline for a fido based totally on the health concerns from using
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> I warned my cousin 10 years ago about having 2 cell phones permamantly glued to
> her ear, and unfortunately it fell on deaf ears.
Steven Fisher - 25 Oct 2003 08:55 GMT
> I could be wrong, and way off base on this one, but I would think twice before
> tossing my landline for a fido based totally on the health concerns from using
> cellular telephones. The jury is still out on this one. There are many
> scientists that claim that extended use of wireless phones cause brain tumours.
> Note that I said wireless, and not just cellular. Yup I am throwing the cordless
> 900, 2.4GHz and 5.6GHz home phones into this pile too.

I'm more concerned with analog cells or cordless phones than a digital
cell. The power output isn't that high on a modern digital cell, is it?
Howard Eisenhauer - 25 Oct 2003 19:43 GMT
If you havn't seen this have a look-

http://www.mcw.edu/gcrc/cop/cell-phone-health-FAQ/toc.html

Wade through it & form your own opinions :).

-Howard.

: I could be wrong, and way off base on this one, but I would think twice before
: tossing my landline for a fido based totally on the health concerns from using
: cellular telephones. The jury is still out on this one. There are many
: scientists that claim that extended use of wireless phones cause brain tumours.
: Note that I said wireless, and not just cellular. Yup I am throwing the cordless
: 900, 2.4GHz and 5.6GHz home phones into this pile too.

: Naturally every time a doctor or scientist goes on the record and says that they
: have scientific data that links cancer to exposure to rf energy due to the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
: that the cause of her tumour was exposure to radio energy from her cellular
: phone.

: Now that Fido is convincing many to dump their line lines, and go exclusively
: wireless, with unlimited talk time, my fear is that we are going to see a big
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
: I warned my cousin 10 years ago about having 2 cell phones permamantly glued to
: her ear, and unfortunately it fell on deaf ears.

--
Howard Eisenhauer on           **************************************
                              *                                    *
Chebucto Community Network     *    Can't think of anything cute    *
Halifax Nova Scotia            *           to put in here           *
                              *                                    *
aa988@chebucto.ns.ca           **************************************
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.