Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Fido / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New phone this month

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tony - 06 Jan 2004 23:48 GMT
I hear Fido is getting a flip phone with integrated camera later this month.

tony
Pavel - 07 Jan 2004 00:16 GMT
How much?
: I hear Fido is getting a flip phone with integrated camera later this month.
:
: tony
Joseph - 07 Jan 2004 22:33 GMT
>How much?

$19.95

>: I hear Fido is getting a flip phone with integrated camera later
>this month.
>:
>: tony

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
          remove NO from .NOcom to reply
babybug - 08 Jan 2004 04:19 GMT
> How much?
> : I hear Fido is getting a flip phone with integrated camera later
>  this month.
> :
> : tony

It is going to be the Sony Ericsson Z200. Price still unconfirmed....
Cellular Unlocker - 07 Jan 2004 19:14 GMT
They will (apparently) be getting the Sony Ericsson Z200, but, unlike its
big brother the Z600, it does not have a built-in camera.

CU

> I hear Fido is getting a flip phone with integrated camera later this month.
>
> tony
Pavel - 08 Jan 2004 01:32 GMT
Sony Ericsson sucks. Now, if they have a Nokia for $20...

: They will (apparently) be getting the Sony Ericsson Z200, but, unlike its
: big brother the Z600, it does not have a built-in camera.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
: >
: > tony
Cellular Unlocker - 08 Jan 2004 07:40 GMT
That's quite a generalization.  I had a Nokia once.  An 8260 with Rogers.
It sucked real bad, I guess all Nokia's suck.

CU

> Sony Ericsson sucks. Now, if they have a Nokia for $20...
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> : >
> : > tony
Pavel - 08 Jan 2004 07:57 GMT
I've had a T200 and friends had a few other SE models too. My  T200 was
plagued with problems and the sound quality on this one and  various other
SE's was crappy, IMHO.

I too had an 8260.  I had problems with it, big time. When it worked, it
worked very well. But, for some reason, it kept on going back for repair
because it would "redial" in medium traffic areas and no matter what, it
couldnt make a call.  Hand off was also an issue with my 8260.  I still
liked it though, probably cuz i paid $150 for it when it first came out.

: That's quite a generalization.  I had a Nokia once.  An 8260 with Rogers.
: It sucked real bad, I guess all Nokia's suck.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
: > : >
: > : > tony
Cellular Unlocker - 08 Jan 2004 15:40 GMT
My point exactly, you say "Sony Ericsson sucks" because of the one bad
experience with the T200.  I don't really think Nokia sucks, I was just
making a point.  You cannot judge a manufacturer by only one of their
products.  Well, we all have our preferences.

CU

> I've had a T200 and friends had a few other SE models too. My  T200 was
> plagued with problems and the sound quality on this one and  various other
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> : > : >
> : > : > tony
Steven Fisher - 08 Jan 2004 18:14 GMT
> My point exactly, you say "Sony Ericsson sucks" because of the one bad
> experience with the T200.  I don't really think Nokia sucks, I was just
> making a point.  You cannot judge a manufacturer by only one of their
> products.  Well, we all have our preferences.

I think they do suck, because all the SEs I've seen have poorly designed
menu layouts. Now, granted, I haven't tried one of their Symbian
smartphones, but I don't want a Symbian smartphone.

Signature

"Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice."

JF Mezei - 09 Jan 2004 09:59 GMT
> I think they do suck, because all the SEs I've seen have poorly designed
> menu layouts. Now, granted, I haven't tried one of their Symbian
> smartphones, but I don't want a Symbian smartphone.

Aren't all Sony-Ericcson based on Symbian OS ? And why do you not want one
based on Symbian-OS (formerly known as EPOC-32, developped by PSION)
Steven Fisher - 09 Jan 2004 16:51 GMT
>>I think they do suck, because all the SEs I've seen have poorly designed
>>menu layouts. Now, granted, I haven't tried one of their Symbian
>>smartphones, but I don't want a Symbian smartphone.
>
> Aren't all Sony-Ericcson based on Symbian OS ? And why do you not want one
> based on Symbian-OS (formerly known as EPOC-32, developped by PSION)

Are they? I thought that was only the PDA phones like the P800. As to
why... well, I don't want a PDA phone. I have a PDA. I have a phone.
They're both things I like, but I like to keep them separate, much like
sex and violence. ;)

Signature

"Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice."

JF Mezei - 10 Jan 2004 08:33 GMT
> Are they? I thought that was only the PDA phones like the P800. As to
> why... well, I don't want a PDA phone. I have a PDA. I have a phone.

The mobile phone companies bought into EPOC 32 because they realised it was
pointless to constantly rewrite their own operating systems for phones.

Yes, EPOC32 (Symbian OS) was first implemented into the PSION Series 5 PDA,
and then into PDA-phones but the first models were two separate units into the
same box: the old OS/chip for the GSM portion, and EPOC32 for the user
interface with a link between the two (the PDA acted as a glorified keyboard
to the phone).

But the current crop of phones seems to be based on Symbian even if they are
not a "PDA". For instance, Symbian OS provides the TCPIP, GPRS, SMS, GSM stack
and then each company writes their own interface (the original EPOC 32
interfaces were dumped so that each cell phone company could write their own UI).

So the mobile phone companies are using SYMBIAN OS more and an operating
system than a PDA, but on the more expoensive phones are adding PDA applications.

Symbian OS also provides for JAVA. It should technically also provide for OPL
(a BASIC-like programming language dating back to the original 16 bit EPOC)
but I do not know if it would work on a phone.
Pavel - 09 Jan 2004 02:02 GMT
I hear ya.  However,  I forgot to mention that SE's Customer Service
in both in the USA and Canada did nothing for me with the various
problems with the phone.  They lacked professionalism and didn't give
a hoot.  I had problems with the Nokia, but they went out of their
way, as best as they could to remedy the problem.  I can't say the
same about SE.   I can go on and on, about the T200 and the quality of
this phone.  I have also talked to a many, many people who had SE
products. Most [but not all]  are unhappy with their phone.  It's not
scientific but in my opinion, from my experience and others that I
know, SE sucks.

Nokia also has an actual repair facility back east. SE has no factory
or repair facility in Canada.  Teleplan just replaces their phones.
Quality, reliability, service and support are all important to me.
This is what Nokia has and looks like Siemens does too, at least
quality anyways, so far.  These phones are the ones that I have had
including Audiovox and Mitsubishi.

: My point exactly, you say "Sony Ericsson sucks" because of the one bad
: experience with the T200.  I don't really think Nokia sucks, I was just
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
: > : > : >
: > : > : > tony
JF Mezei - 09 Jan 2004 10:12 GMT
> Quality, reliability, service and support are all important to me.
> This is what Nokia has and looks like Siemens does too, at least
> quality anyways, so far.

As I expect to get an M55 any day now, I called Siemens to ask a simple
question: does the M55 use any standard interface between a laptop and the
phone for GPRS access ?

It took about 10 minutes for me to spell my name, address, email., colour of
underwear and plenty of other details to some americans who doesn't know what
"zed" means because I finally got to ask my simple question and the guy was
*totally* clueless. I really mean "totally". I just said that I just tell my
windows laptop that I am connecting to a GPRS phone. (even though IO had
repeatedly specified to hism I didn'T run anmy microsoft software and I just
wanted to know what standard was used for the interface).

I did find one standard for such interface (GSM 07.07) but I have no idea if
the Siemens phones support that standard. It will cost me the proprietary
cable to find out. And the first thing I need to do is to chop off the IBM -PC
DB-9 connector and put a real RS232 connector so I can talk to it from non
wintel machines.
Pavel - 10 Jan 2004 05:39 GMT
: As I expect to get an M55 any day now, I called Siemens to ask a simple
: question: does the M55 use any standard interface between a laptop and the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
: DB-9 connector and put a real RS232 connector so I can talk to it from non
: wintel machines.

This info is a little disturbing.  For the simple reason that it
sounds very similar to the ordeal I went through with Sony Ericsson. I
also did some research as well.  If you have a Siemens phone and you
choose not to take it to a Fido flag ship, the only place that does a
replacement (with a refurbished unit) is Teleplan.  They also look
after Sony Ericsson service support.  I wonder what happens if you are
a Roger's customer and have a Siemens phone?  I suspect the same.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.