>> >Is anyone here aware of a GSM modem (dual-band will do) with a USB
>> >interface - preferably powered via the USB ?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>interface. It's a lot easier to interface 10 USB units than 10 RS232 units +
>power supplies to a PC these days.
The basic problem is that PCs expect modems to be on serial ports, not USB
ports, so when a USB cable is used, it's still a virtual serial port.

Signature
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular
Per Laursen - 24 Oct 2004 11:26 GMT
> >> >Is anyone here aware of a GSM modem (dual-band will do) with a USB
> >> >interface - preferably powered via the USB ?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> The basic problem is that PCs expect modems to be on serial ports, not USB
> ports, so when a USB cable is used, it's still a virtual serial port.
Virtual serial ports are OK - I do the PC software myself. Currently, I'm
interfacing the PC to GSM modems via regular RS232 ports, USB-to-serial
adapters and USB-to-Bluetooth. All I need is access to the AT-command
interface.
The USB-to-GSM just seems attractive (if available) because then I wont need
external mains adapters and a lot of cabling (yes, I know about the power
limitations of USB).
GSM modems with PCMCIA is a possible alternative, but requires PCI-to-PCMCIA
adapters and a PCMCIA card that allows me to place two of them adjacently.
The current model I have (OvisLink) is too thick at the prodtruding part to
allow this.
regards
Per
John Navas - 24 Oct 2004 21:48 GMT
>GSM modems with PCMCIA is a possible alternative, but requires PCI-to-PCMCIA
>adapters and a PCMCIA card that allows me to place two of them adjacently.
>The current model I have (OvisLink) is too thick at the prodtruding part to
>allow this.
Sony Ericsson GC82 has no such protrusion.

Signature
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular