 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / General / GSM / December 2004gsm jamming devices
Is there a reputable brand for gsm jamming devices around? Google returned ample hits but not sure about the trustworthiness of the sources. B. >Is there a reputable brand for gsm jamming devices around? Google >returned ample hits but not sure about the trustworthiness of the sources. By definition disreputable since such devices are unlawful in most countries.  SignatureBest regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES: John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.gsm - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE] > >>Is there a reputable brand for gsm jamming devices around? Google >>returned ample hits but not sure about the trustworthiness of the sources. > > By definition disreputable since such devices are unlawful in most countries. This may come as a shock John, but some people don't care. As far as they're concerned, cell phones are the single most intrusive device ever invented, and they refuse to allow this technology to be foisted upon them, regardless of the outcome to others. Akin to a detector on the dash of their car to warn about speed traps - a techno war of sorts. Their only concern is an FCC fine, which would simply be factored in as a cost of doing business to be passed on the their clients, assuming the fallout would ever get that far in the first place. In their camp, it's really no more complicated than that, and they smirk at the putz trying to make a call in the middle of everyone else's dinner, concert, worship, funeral, wedding, movie, recital, etc. The newest anti-tech bomb was a single-button clicker than turns off any TV in the room. "TV-B-Gone" http://www.engadget.com/entry/0254838747325715/ I've already bought several for stocking stuffers. <giggle> Signaturejer email reply - I am not a 'ten' >> By definition disreputable since such devices are unlawful in most countries. > >This may come as a shock John, but some people don't care. ... Indeed -- there are those so arrogant that they presume to take the law into their own hands -- they are called vigilantes. They do more harm than good, and are antithetical to the civilized rule of law. SignatureBest regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES: John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.gsm - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE] > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > their own hands -- they are called vigilantes. They do more harm than good, > and are antithetical to the civilized rule of law. As I said, they don't care about someone elses laws because those laws never considered what was important to them. They're sorta like those Iraqi insurgent folks trying to protect their homes and families against intruders. In times of desparation, arrogance serves where consideration failed. If using a cell phone despite the concerns of others was important, and I knew a particular place was troublesome for accomplishing that task, I'd just find another place to spend my money and leave the arrogant bastards to their own. It's all about choices John - yours, mine, and everyone elses. I know you agree with the aspect of choices because I presumed you spoke the truth when you said you did. Right? Signaturejer email reply - I am not a 'ten' >As I said, they don't care about someone elses laws because those laws >never considered what was important to them. Let me catch someone jamming my cell phone and then watch the results. Iraqui insurgents will seem like tame activities to what would happen to the person I catch! -- John S. e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net >>As I said, they don't care about someone elses laws because those laws >>never considered what was important to them. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Iraqui insurgents will seem like tame activities to what would happen to the >person I catch! So what are you going to do? Beat them up? And land in jail? SignatureBest regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES: John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.gsm - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE] > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > So what are you going to do? Beat them up? And land in jail? Sure, why not? It's the Amerikan way. There's always someone else to blame. Signaturejer email reply - I am not a 'ten' >As I said, they don't care about someone elses laws because those laws >never considered what was important to them. They're the kind who'd better like striped sunlight, then. There are those who enforce laws, whether your kind like the particular law or not. >This may come as a shock John, but some people don't care. On the other hand, reputable and illegal don't fall into the same category. So there is no such thing as a "Reputable" jammer. Illegal is illegal and like John said by defination is not reputable. -- John S. e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net > Is there a reputable brand for gsm jamming devices around? That's a rhetorical question, right? :) You could in-case the place is a farady cage though. PD SignaturePaul Day Web: www.bur.st/~paul GPG Key ID: 7FF655A8 The Israeli company that you have surely run into is reputable, but you better be prepared for the legal consequences if you are caught using a jammer in a country where it is illegal. It only takes one person to figure out that a jammer is in place for all h--- to break loose. Stu > Is there a reputable brand for gsm jamming devices around? Google > returned ample hits but not sure about the trustworthiness of the sources. > > B. > The Israeli company that you have surely run into is reputable, but you > better be prepared for the legal consequences if you are caught using a > jammer in a country where it is illegal. It only takes one person to figure > out that a jammer is in place for all h--- to break loose. > > Stu I guess we're all suppose to start shaking in our boots now. Signaturejer email reply - I am not a 'ten' >I guess we're all suppose to start shaking in our boots now. No, not yet. Wait till they introduce you to your cell-mate, Tiny. >> The Israeli company that you have surely run into is reputable, but you >> better be prepared for the legal consequences if you are caught using a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >I guess we're all suppose to start shaking in our boots now. Yup, looks like the type of people who would maliciously disrupt communications would be the same type who wear boots. ron I don't know, a $50k fine would make me pause. Stu >> The Israeli company that you have surely run into is reputable, but you >> better be prepared for the legal consequences if you are caught using a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I guess we're all suppose to start shaking in our boots now. >Is there a reputable brand for gsm jamming devices around? Google >returned ample hits but not sure about the trustworthiness of the sources. You don't mention where you are but (in the USA) there can't be a "reputable" brand of an illegal device. Kinda like asking if there is a reputable drug dealer on the corner. -- John S. e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.