>> As far as I can see, there are now 2 distinct networks. Today it's 3GSM
> and CDMA's EV-DO. Are there any handsets that work on both? Would there
> be any point anymore?

Signature
Donald Newcomb
DRNewcomb (at) attglobal (dot) net
> > As far as I can see, there are now 2 distinct networks. Today it's
> > 3GSM and CDMA's EV-DO. Are there any handsets that work on both?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> S. Koreans who do it. They are building a WCDMA-2100 net but
> with no GSM to fall-back on for coverage, it is not very popular.
I found on the Qualcomm website that they're producing a new chip
(7500) for Q2 2005, which works on CDMA's EV-DO as well as GSM/GPRS.
http://www.cdmatech.com/solutions/products/msm7500_chipset_solution.jsp
Qualcomm seem to be looking at bridging their own CDMA with 3GSM
wherever possible, and since their CDMA patents are being used in 3GSM
anyway I guess they're trying to boost that usage.
It certainly appears that the "one phone" standard itself didn't make
it.
> I would be more concerned about multi-band (1900/2100) WCDMA
> and multi-mode 3G (TD-CDMA & WCDMA)
I haven't heard the acronym "TD-CDMA" before - is that a new standard?
I thought TD and CD were 2 different modes already used in WCDMA (aka
UMTS aka 3GSM).
Interesting
> since TD-CDMA will probably be a strong 3G service in
> the USA (Having messed up the lower half of the
> WCDMA-2100 band with PCS 1900.
I didn't realise WCDMA used the 1900Mhz spectrum.
Doesn't that give existing 1900Mhz GSM providers a prime opportunity to
move to 3G using their existing spectrum?
Thanks.
Greg