Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / General / GSM / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Internal VS. External Antenna

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kentish - 10 Jul 2005 12:55 GMT
Is there a significance about internal (hidden) versus external
(protruding/retractable) antenna in terms of signal reception?
John Navas - 10 Jul 2005 16:44 GMT
>Is there a significance about internal (hidden) versus external
>(protruding/retractable) antenna in terms of signal reception?

In general, external is better.

Signature

Best regards,        HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas           <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

Joseph - 10 Jul 2005 16:57 GMT
>Is there a significance about internal (hidden) versus external
>(protruding/retractable) antenna in terms of signal reception?

Now since they've been doing it for several years now there isn't a
whole lot of difference.  A difference is that you won't be breaking
off the antenna and getting it replaced as often which is part of the
reason that manufacturers went with internal.  Some have mastered it
better than others.  Nokia has done it well.  Ericsson has not or
perhaps it's just a poorly enginnering job that makes Ericsson
handsets have worse RF than others.
- -
         
John Navas - 10 Jul 2005 23:48 GMT
>>Is there a significance about internal (hidden) versus external
>>(protruding/retractable) antenna in terms of signal reception?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>perhaps it's just a poorly enginnering job that makes Ericsson
>handsets have worse RF than others.

It's actually urban myth/legend -- model differences notwithstanding, Sony
Ericsson handsets are as good in general as any other manufacturer (and better
than most IMHO).  For example, I know of no tri-band Nokia that does a better
job on RF with internal antenna than the Sony Ericsson Z600.  And I've yet to
see any handset with an internal antenna that measures up to the Sony Ericsson
T39m with (extendable) Extended Range antenna.

Of course, as always, YMMV.  ;)

Signature

Best regards,        HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas           <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.