> Yes, I have already set it
>
> AT+CBST? return 7,0,1
I'm not sure you're going to get far with your
at+csns=0
command, even on the SIM where you get handshaking. A value of
zero for the "AT+CSNS" command indicates a voice call according
to GSM 07.07. A value of "4" specifies a data call.
It just might be possible to somehow pass data over a GSM voice
call at _very_ slow speed (I have never tried). Does the
handshaking progress to a "CONNECT"? If so, what's the
reported throughput speed for the connection?
Normally you'd require a data call, which has the necessary
"data-friendly" characteristics. And usually that's achieved
by calling a data number. But the "single numbering scheme"
seems to offer the possibility of establishing both voice and
data calls to a combination voice/data number. I was not aware
that any provider offered this service.
John
eeh - 16 Mar 2007 09:51 GMT
> > Yes, I have already set it
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> John
Sorry!
at+csns=4 is right!
John Henderson - 16 Mar 2007 10:10 GMT
> at+csns=4 is right!
A data call. Excellent! Just what you need.
The simplest explanation for its not working with another
provider is that they don't support the "single numbering
scheme". You could ask them what their procedure is for
routing data calls to their customers. They may have to
subscribe to a dedicated data number. This is the method that
I'm familiar with.
John
eeh - 16 Mar 2007 10:53 GMT
> > at+csns=4 is right!
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> John
Thank you very much!
I think your suggestion is correct.
I will try it.
Bye!
eeh - 23 Mar 2007 14:39 GMT
> > at+csns=4 is right!
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> John
I have obtained a new SIM card. The card is surely having data service
as my friend claimed that it is being used in some repeater devices.
I have tried to connect the wireless modem from my PC modem and found
that the connection has no ring tone and connection handshaking tone.
Is it possible that a connection does not require them?