John Henderson schrieb:
> [...]
> Yes, but it is increasingly true that GSM is limited to 35 km.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> because half the available timeslots are sacrificed to the job
> of extending Timing Advance on the other half.
The patent in the link claims to describe a method that works without
sacrificing half of the timeslots.
> More importantly, the only manufacturer of ER cells (Ericsson)
> has not made any GPRS-compatible versions. With GPRS expected
> as an important part of GSM coverage, ER cells are being
> converted to standard cells rather than vice versa.
At least Motorola sells extended range BTSs as well. Do you have any
documentation that explays as to why GPRS and extended range should not
go together?
Andreas
John Henderson - 24 Jun 2008 21:57 GMT
> John Henderson schrieb:
>> [...]
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> The patent in the link claims to describe a method that works
> without sacrificing half of the timeslots.
If that's the case, then this is a new development. That
wording is too obscure for me to put a firm interpretation onto
it without giving it a great deal of time and thought. Thanks
for the reference.
>> More importantly, the only manufacturer of ER cells
>> (Ericsson)
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> have any documentation that explays as to why GPRS and
> extended range should not go together?
I had not heard of Motorola's entry into this market. Do you
have any references?
I understand the combination of GPRS and ER to be just "too
hard" (given the potential market), rather than impossible. If
GPRS ER develoment has been done recently, then it may be too
little, too late (with UMTS being pushed). Certainly the
number of ER cells in rural Australia was shrinking the last
time I was able to get any information (Vodafone used to
publish a list of cells which were not GPRS-compatible).
I quite like the guaranteed call quality from a TDMA-based
system like 2G GSM. CDMA-based systems can cram more data into
the available spectrum, but at the expense of call quality when
the system loads up heavily (especially for distant calls /
weaker signals).
John
John Henderson - 28 Jun 2008 10:47 GMT
I wrote:
> I had not heard of Motorola's entry into this market. Do you
> have any references?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> time I was able to get any information (Vodafone used to
> publish a list of cells which were not GPRS-compatible).
I see that Motorola were planning to sell Extended Range cells,
/with/ /GPRS/ from last year:
http://www.motorola.com/mot/doc/6/6679_MotDoc.pdf
John