Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / General / GSM / December 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GSM 1900 Indoor Repeater

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Francois Boulanger - 28 Nov 2003 03:04 GMT
Anyone use such a repeater to improve home/office reception ?
If so, how efficient is it, and what is the cost ?

I have found only one model (JDTECK) et around $700.00US.

Thanks,

Frank
Trey - 29 Nov 2003 06:23 GMT
take a look at http://www.cellantenna.com/ they have a few different kinds
there.

we have a Nextel BDA at work. I have a company issue Nextel phone, and I get
great coverage throughout the building. I would think the GSM BDAs would
work just as well for a house. I am looking to get a BDA for my house too,
but I am not willing to give up $500+ to get one. I would rather have my
cell carrier just build a tower closer to my house ;-)

> Anyone use such a repeater to improve home/office reception ?
> If so, how efficient is it, and what is the cost ?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Frank
Roopinder Randhawa - 29 Nov 2003 07:27 GMT
If you are in a rural area then you will probably need to buy it.
If in an office building tell the landlord and they do it after a few faxes
and threats.
You then get coverage even in elevators deep in the building.
> take a look at http://www.cellantenna.com/ they have a few different kinds
> there.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >
> > Frank
Trey - 29 Nov 2003 07:40 GMT
When we talked to Nextel, and told them that we wanted 100% coverage in our
building for the 500 phones we will be buying from them, or we will go with
someone else. Nextel became very helpful with the install of the BDA. and
since we own the building. there is no one for us to send the faxes to.
For my house. no one gets signal. Nextel, ATT, cingular, Verizon, sprint.
they are all very poor at my house. I am trying to find out about the GSM
850 coverage in my area. but no one knows anything on the subject of 850 GSM
coverage in Orange County. Ether no one wants to share any info, or there
just isn't any to share.  1900 is pretty good normally. there are a few dead
spots that I have come across. like my house. so the debate is should I get
a 850/1900 phone? or just get a BDA?

> If you are in a rural area then you will probably need to buy it.
> If in an office building tell the landlord and they do it after a few faxes
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > >
> > > Frank
Mel Harris - 30 Nov 2003 18:01 GMT
I live in Ottawa and Rogers recently started using the 850 band. With my
1900 phone, Nokia 6310i, I had no reception in my house at all. I bought a
Moto 720g, works on 850/1900, and not only do I have reception in the house,
it even works in the basement. It seems to be a much stronger and clearer
band because as good as the Nokia was, the Moto has better clarity on both
ends and a much stonger signal. Instead of spending big bucks on a repeater,
I would try an 850 phone.

Signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com

> When we talked to Nextel, and told them that we wanted 100% coverage in our
> building for the 500 phones we will be buying from them, or we will go with
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Frank
Trey - 30 Nov 2003 21:15 GMT
I would love to try a 850/1900 phone, but I have not heard anything about
ATT having any 850 GSM towers in Southern California. I have found one line
in a google search that makes mention of a city in Southern CA that may have
850 GSM, but the site is out or commission now, so I cant read into it at
all. I really don't want to pay full retail for a new phone just so I can
get a feature that wont work. Once I find out if there is any 850 around
here, I will get a new phone.

> I live in Ottawa and Rogers recently started using the 850 band. With my
> 1900 phone, Nokia 6310i, I had no reception in my house at all. I bought a
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
> > > > >
> > > > > Frank
Aboutdakota - 01 Dec 2003 04:39 GMT
> I live in Ottawa and Rogers recently started using the 850 band. With my
> 1900 phone, Nokia 6310i, I had no reception in my house at all. I bought a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ends and a much stonger signal. Instead of spending big bucks on a repeater,
> I would try an 850 phone.

Don't Telus and Bell have the 800/850 A and B licenses in Ottowa?

==AD
Mel Harris - 01 Dec 2003 06:24 GMT
Bell and Telus are CDMA. They are also using 1X but they do not use GSM.
Only Rogers and Fido are GSM.

Mel

Signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com

> > I live in Ottawa and Rogers recently started using the 850 band. With my
> > 1900 phone, Nokia 6310i, I had no reception in my house at all. I bought a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> ==AD
Aboutdakota - 08 Dec 2003 18:10 GMT
> Bell and Telus are CDMA. They are also using 1X but they do not use GSM.
> Only Rogers and Fido are GSM.
>
> Mel

I know that Telus and Bell both use CDMA, and that Rogers and Fido use
GSM.  I thought that Telus primarily used the 800 mHz band, along with
Bell, and that Fido and Rogers used GSM in the 1900 mHz band.  If Rogers
uses the 850 mHz band, then Telus must be using the 1900 mHz band, right?

==AD
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.