Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Nextel / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FU Nextel!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Scout - 13 Feb 2006 09:52 GMT
oh man,
so i buy a nextel phone. they give me a number. it turns out the number
belonged to a guy who owes nextel $300. So Nextel hires these jerkoffs:
First Revenue Assurance, (303) 595-8100, 200 Fillmore St Ste 200, Denver, CO
80206 to harass me. After 5 or 6 calls where I explain I'm not Joe W., and
each time they promise to correct the mistake, they call a 7th time.

Well this is chewing up my allotted minutes, and I'm running out of
paitience, and I say, "For god's sake, can't you guys figure out that you're
harassing a new customer? You gave me Joe W.'s friggin number!"

Well, this pisses off the bitch at the other end of the line who cusses me
out and hangs up on me.

So FU Nextel, FU First Revenue Assurance (feel free to call at (303)
595-8100 and ask for any incompetent asswipe; be sure to give them a hard
time.

~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.
Zman - 13 Feb 2006 17:00 GMT
Did you ever think to call Nextel and ask them to change your number?

> oh man,
> so i buy a nextel phone. they give me a number. it turns out the number
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> ~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.
Scout - 14 Feb 2006 09:52 GMT
Why not fix the problem instead of just passing it along to someone else?

> Did you ever think to call Nextel and ask them to change your number?
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>
>> ~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.
Zman - 14 Feb 2006 17:19 GMT
When a phone is disconnected, the number goes into a holding queue.  The
length of time is dependant upon the availability of NPA/NXX in the
particular NMB (in other words, it depends on the supply/demand).  Since
there are limited numbers, they have to recycle the numbers.  Unfortunately,
they cannot control what contact number a customer has given out to
creditors, even to Nextel.  They have to allow customers to use their Nextel
number as some disconnect their home numbers or port their home numbers in,
and this is the only way to get in contact with the customer.  You should be
able to call Nextel's collections number (800) 456-6070 and have them
contact the collection agency to inform them that the number they are
calling does not belong to the debtor and to stop calling it.

Good luck.

> Why not fix the problem instead of just passing it along to someone else?
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> >>
> >> ~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.
Scout - 15 Feb 2006 09:38 GMT
thanks for the info Zman!
Scout

> When a phone is disconnected, the number goes into a holding queue.  The
> length of time is dependant upon the availability of NPA/NXX in the
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>> >>
>> >> ~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.
Chris Sweeney - 14 Feb 2006 00:03 GMT
Really has nothing to do with Sprint/Nextel.  It was probly the only
number the guy who didn't pay his bill had and when they turned the
account over to collections, guess what number they gave them to call?!!
Agree'd that First Revenue should have corrected the problem the first
time, but this really does not have much to do with Nextel.

> oh man,
> so i buy a nextel phone. they give me a number. it turns out the number
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> ~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.
Scout - 14 Feb 2006 09:55 GMT
Nextel was the victim of the first customer, and rightly so they passed his
number along to the collection people. But how can they also give the number
to a new customer and not expect a problem?  I think Nextel has everything
to do with the problem; afterall, they gave the number to all three parties
involved here.
Scout

> Really has nothing to do with Sprint/Nextel.  It was probly the only
> number the guy who didn't pay his bill had and when they turned the
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>>
>> ~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.
Chris Sweeney - 14 Feb 2006 16:21 GMT
How do you expect the people in Nextels credit department to know if
that is a current customers wireless number or what it is.  It was just
the number the old customer had listed in his account data as a vaild
contact number.  They are not calling it expecting him to answer his
wireless phone it has been turned off at this point, rather they think
it is his home phone or another contact number.  Especially with number
porting these days its hard to keep track of who's number is what at
this point.  Phone numbers are recycled about every 6 months with most
companys more often if the area is short on numbers.  If they dind't
give out old numbers we wouldn't have any phone numbers to get at this
point.

> Nextel was the victim of the first customer, and rightly so they passed his
> number along to the collection people. But how can they also give the number
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>>
>>> ~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.
Jeremy - 14 Feb 2006 17:23 GMT
> How do you expect the people in Nextels credit department to know if
> that is a current customers wireless number or what it is.  It was just
> the number the old customer had listed in his account data as a vaild
> contact number.

Perhaps you misunderstood.  I was pointing out that the COLLECTION AGENCY
had a legal obligation not to contact third parties or unrelated parties,
once they were made aware that the number their client provided was
unrelated to the debtor.

The collection agency would have simply apologized for the inconvenience,
and struck the number off the contact list for that account.  It should not
have continued calling that number again.

Sprint, as the client that hired that agency, should be informed about their
agent's actions.

The first offense is a mistake.  The subsequent offenses are prohibited.
Zman - 15 Feb 2006 16:23 GMT
Unfortunately, people lie. Especially to collection agencies.  Collection
agencies tend not to believe whoever answers the number they are calling
when they tell the agency that they are not the person they are looking for.
I have had to contact agencies to inform them that the number they were
calling no longer belonged to the debtor.

> > How do you expect the people in Nextels credit department to know if
> > that is a current customers wireless number or what it is.  It was just
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> The first offense is a mistake.  The subsequent offenses are prohibited.
DevilsPGD - 18 Feb 2006 07:03 GMT
>Unfortunately, people lie. Especially to collection agencies.  Collection
>agencies tend not to believe whoever answers the number they are calling
>when they tell the agency that they are not the person they are looking for.
>I have had to contact agencies to inform them that the number they were
>calling no longer belonged to the debtor.

While true, that doesn't exempt them from harassment laws, or the fact
that in most states they are required, by law, to stop calling once you
ask them to cease.

Signature

It's always darkest before dawn. So if you're going to
steal your neighbor's newspaper, that's the time to do it.

Jeremy - 14 Feb 2006 12:27 GMT
>> so i buy a nextel phone. they give me a number. it turns out the number
>> belonged to a guy who owes nextel $300. So Nextel hires these jerkoffs:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> and
>> each time they promise to correct the mistake, they call a 7th time.

1: The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act provides for the Federal Trade
Commission to exact penalties against collection agencies that engage in
such practices.

Send a CERTIFIED LETTER (so they can't deny they heard from you), explaining
that you are not the debtor, that you explained this to their rep 6 times,
and demand that they CEASE AND DESIST from contacting you at your number.

2: Go to the FTC web site (ftc.gov?) and file a complaint if the collection
agency bothers you again.  In all probability, that will get them to stop.

The agents you have been dealing with on the phone are probably low-wage
drones that are expected to make a lot of calls and not waste time cleaning
up paperwork and billing errors.  They will not help you.
Scout - 15 Feb 2006 09:40 GMT
Thanks for the info Jeremy, and Chris too. I was emailed by someone who, I
think, corrected the problem. Thanks to all!
Scout

>>> so i buy a nextel phone. they give me a number. it turns out the number
>>> belonged to a guy who owes nextel $300. So Nextel hires these jerkoffs:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> drones that are expected to make a lot of calls and not waste time
> cleaning up paperwork and billing errors.  They will not help you.
DJ Mello - 18 Feb 2006 09:26 GMT
Scout Wrote:
> oh man,
> so i buy a nextel phone. they give me a number. it turns out th
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> ~Not Joe W., and I pay my bills.

Something doesn't sound right here.  #1: Nextel doesn't give ne
customers OLD phone numbers from a previous customer!  So I don't kno
how that happened, are you sure that's what happened?  Maybe tha
company just has the wrong number. From my understanding, once a
account is closed for whatever reason, that phone number dies with it
and can't be re-used!  So that's what confuses me with your situation.

Tell that company that they have the wrong number and to check thei
records,  tell them that you are not Joe W. and there is no-one by tha
name at your number.  I don't see why that wouldn't work, they should'v
stopped after the 1st or 2nd call
Scout - 18 Feb 2006 11:10 GMT
> Scout Wrote:
>> oh man,
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> name at your number.  I don't see why that wouldn't work, they should've
> stopped after the 1st or 2nd call.

Trust me, that's exactly what happened. Someone here gave me some good
advice, which was to call an 800 number and speak to Nextel's financial. I
did that yesterday and Nextel pulled up the number that was giving me all
the grief and said it still belonged to Joe Walsh, whoever that deadbeat is,
and that his account is still suspended but with that number?? How can that
be, if I'm the one answering the phone when 267-718-3657 is dialed? They
decided to give me a new number and ol' Joe can keep his. By the way, I
called and emailed First Revenue Assurance and made a formal complaint in
which I tried to lay out the problem so they could understand. Their
response was to escalate the number of harassment calls to sometimes twice
an hour. They ate up all my minutes, made my phone ring constantly which got
me in trouble at work, raised my blood pressure, gave me lectures on paying
my bills and being kind to people who call me on the phone to harass me, and
finally, forced me to waste my time fixing their system.
Thanks to Nextel for fixing it relatively pain free. I hope the good folks
at First Revenue burn in the lava lakes of hell.
Scout
Jeremy - 18 Feb 2006 14:11 GMT
> I called and emailed First Revenue Assurance and made a formal complaint
> in which I tried to lay out the problem so they could understand. Their
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> paying my bills and being kind to people who call me on the phone to
> harass me, and finally, forced me to waste my time fixing their system.

Rather than bitch about them--which will get you nowhere--why don't you
complain on the FTC web site of their repeated violations of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act?

You can also complain to the Pennsylvania Attorney General (probably on
their web site).

You can do a Google search for lawyers that sue collection agencies over
FDCPA violations, and you may be entitled to civil penalties of $2000 per
occurrence.

Collection agencies have legal restrictions placed on them to not disclose
the details of debts to third parties (Mr. Walsh is entitled to his privacy,
the First Revenue had no right to discuss his debt with you.  They should
have first confirmed that YOU were Joe Walsh).  They are also barred from
making repeated phone calls on the same day.

So, are you going to take action?
Scout - 18 Feb 2006 14:35 GMT
>> I called and emailed First Revenue Assurance and made a formal complaint
>> in which I tried to lay out the problem so they could understand. Their
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> So, are you going to take action?

Thanks for the good advice Jeremy. I have taken action and my phone number
has been changed. I'm still not satisfied that the system has improved, and
will look into making a complaint to the FTC.
Scout
Scott - 18 Feb 2006 16:54 GMT
> Scout Wrote:
>> oh man,
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> account is closed for whatever reason, that phone number dies with it,
> and can't be re-used!  So that's what confuses me with your situation.

Not true- they recycle numbers all the time.
Jeremy - 18 Feb 2006 19:47 GMT
>> Scout Wrote:
>>> oh man,
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Not true- they recycle numbers all the time.

It is doubtful that Sprint deliberately instructed their collection agency
to harass an innocent third party.  It is more likely that the agency
employs dimwits, working for not much above minimum wage, who couldn't care
less that they were calling the wrong number (probably dialed by a
predictive dialer) and who didn't want to bother submitting a report to
their management to delete the phone number from the account records.

A formal complaint to the FTC or state regulatory agency will usually get
the agency's attention.  A formal complaint to Nextel may also result in
their calling their agency and asking for an explanation and correction.

Complaining to the agency directly will not result in anything.  Go to the
FTC web site, spend 5 minutes filing the complaint, then put your feet up
and watch as the calls soon stop.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.