 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Manufacturers / Nokia / September 2006TalkNokia.com
T-a-l-k-N-o-k-i-a-.-c-o-m- THE WORLD'S PREMIER NOKIA FORUM Latest -HOT- Links: 'How to Play Mobile Java Games On Your PC!' (http://tinyurl.com/rb6zp (Free games, free program!) 'What Nokia Cellphone Are You Currently Using? (http://tinyurl.com/mua5k) '341 Original Nokia Ringtones Free' (http://tinyurl.com/qfxmo) 'More Free Ringtones' (http://tinyurl.com/omlum) 'Free Mobile Games!,' (http://tinyurl.com/s7ceq) 'Free Applications,' (http://tinyurl.com/ladvc) 'Free Wallpapers and Themes,' (http://tinyurl.com/os4fg) 'Even Earn Free Cellphone Accessories for Posting! (http://tinyurl.com/n2pne) 'Download free videos ' (http://tinyurl.com/m6jrd)for your cellphone 'Naruto Vs. Sasuke,' (http://tinyurl.com/poabh) 'Family Guy Clips, (http://tinyurl.com/nvvjf) 'Daily Show on Gay Marriage,' (http://tinyurl.com/lpxct) 'Daily Show o Hurricane Katrina Relief Efforts' (http://tinyurl.com/p9nux) Register and post a short 'Introduction' (http://tinyurl.com/nhc4v) an receive 1,000 cpoints FREE! Use these cpoints to get 'rewarded with rea accessories' (http://tinyurl.com/r22m2) for your cell +------------------------------------------------------------------- |Filename: header.jpg |Download: http://cellphoneforums.net/attachment.php?postid=34948 +------------------------------------------------------------------- A moron from Cellphonewankersforums.net calledTalkNokia.com wrote in a piss poor attempt of spamming: > T-a-l-k-N-o-k-i-a-.-c-o-m- > THE WORLD'S PREMIER NOKIA FORUM! > Latest -HOT- Links: <SNIP> > +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ > |Filename: header.jpg | > |Download: http://cellphoneforums.net/attachment.php?postid=34948 | > +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ PISS OFF you cellphonewankerforums moron! -- The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may belong to. 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. <http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452> Simon Templar Wrote: > A moron from Cellphonewankersforums.net calledTalkNokia.com wrote in a > piss poor attempt of spamming: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. > <http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452> we're not all w.nkers.... and if you don't bump spam it goes awa ;).... that advice given, I shall now take it... byeby Simon Templar Wrote: > A moron from Cellphonewankersforums.net calledTalkNokia.com wrote in a > piss poor attempt of spamming:[color=blue] [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > <snip> Hey, I apologize for this, the member has already been reprimanded an lost all access to newsgroups through our site. No need for the rud remarks about cpf, we're a great cell phone community and ou moderators work hard to keep our boards free of spam. Members ar required to have 20 posts to access newsgroups (to prevent spamming o dumb n00b posts), and there is a warning clearly posted about newsgrou etiquette above each newsgroup. Other forums that link to newsgroup don't take the same precautions to protect their integrity, so pleas understand that this is a VERY RARE occurence and we've already deal with it. Sorry you think we're a bunch of w.nkers, hopefully I'v helped clear up the misunderstanding. : > Simon Templar Wrote: >> A moron from Cellphonewankersforums.net calledTalkNokia.com wrote in a [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > with it. Sorry you think we're a bunch of w.nkers, hopefully I've > helped clear up the misunderstanding. :) At least 95% of posts I have seen from "CPF" members have been moronic posts from snotty nosed school kids that think the world revolves around them and owes them everything. It appears to me NONE of them even know what Usenet or Newsgroups are! -- The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may belong to. 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. <http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452> Simon Templar Wrote: > Simon Templar Wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > <snip> Well, at least 95% of the newsgroup posts I've seen have been foreig scammers and spammers with cheap Nokias from Nigeria, and very rud people with piss-poor attitudes and foul language (not you of course) I'll take the snotty kids any day over the full-grown adults that -act like snotty kids (a lot of newsgroup users!), at least they still hav an opportunity to grow up but I'm afraid for people like you it's to late. Very few of our members ever post in the newsgroups so I don' know where you think you saw all these posts you speak of... bu seriously, get a freakin life. You seem to have quite a chip on you shoulder and maybe you could use some therapy to help get over it. ; > Simon Templar Wrote: >> Simon Templar Wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > seriously, get a freakin life. You seem to have quite a chip on your > shoulder and maybe you could use some therapy to help get over it. ;) After doing so well in your previous post, you had to go and spoil it with that diatribe pretty much proving Simon's point. (And yes, I did take note of the smiley) This used to be a thriving group with many experienced and knowledgable posters who were all more than willing to help out and offer well informed advice. Now, as the sales of Nokia handsets haven't decreased to any perceptible extent, one has to wonder why many of us choose not to take such an active part of this group, or have given up on it completely. Many of the more experienced posters have got fed up with the unflux of users from online forums who haven't got the faintest idea where they are actually posting to, assume that they own the place and can behave like spoilt children. Most of these posters have moved on to the more professional or technical online forums leaving only one or two people here that are willing to wade through the dross and try to help out. Whilst the online forums have their place, they lack the immediacy of usenet and although it's a shame to see such a once vibrant group die, that is exactly what has happened to the alt.cellular groups.  Signature<<< Unlock Your Phone's Potential >>> <<< www.uselessinfo.org.uk >>> <<< www.thephonelocker.co.uk >>> <<< www.gsm-solutions.co.uk >>> Richard Colton Wrote: > > Simon Templar Wrote: > >> Simon Templar Wrote: [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > Motorola, Nokia, Samsing & Sendo.' (http://tinyurl.com/oopew) >>> > <<< 'GSM Solutions' (http://tinyurl.com/s9fw3) >>> Thank you for your response, I've seen some of your other posts in th usenet groups and they have been informative. I'm not sure where I se that I proved Simon's point, it would be rather ignorant to group m with those "spoiled children who think the world revolves around the and owes them everything" if you didn't actually know me. You need t remember that I've been on the defensive from the beginning of thi silly flame because Mr. Templar is so smug as to assert the forums ar run by a bunch of w.nkers when it take only a few seconds to loo around here and see what kind of w.nkers are posting i alt.cellular.nokia these days (I assure you Sir I'm not talking abou you, one of the last non-w.nkers around here). I don't see anyone responding to the usenet spam and calling the w.nkers, Mr. Templar. Even after I tried to offer an explanation an apology, the jerk continued with his rants. What I've said about th scammers, spammers, and rude attitudes here is absolutely true an Simon Templar proved my point on the last one. Once again, I apologize to those of you who have such harsh feeling about forums in general, and I hope you realize that the forums belong to really do take precautions to prevent newbies and spammers from getting into your usenet groups, though I realize many other forums do no such thing. I'm sure a lot of people felt the same way about the automobile when it started replacing the horse-drawn carriage, and eventually those who didn't switch over to the automobile became AMISH. Mr. Templar, one of the reasons our forums have become so popular is that we encourage mutual respect among all members. People tend to get turned off and never return when they see rude people running the show. Perhaps the newsgroups would not have declined so rapidly over the past few years if there were fewer Simon Templars running around calling people w.nkers all the time and flaming people for being poorly-informed. SignatureBrad729 <snip> > Thank you for your response, I've seen some of your other posts in the > usenet groups and they have been informative. I'm not sure where I see [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > alt.cellular.nokia these days (I assure you Sir I'm not talking about > you, one of the last non-w.nkers around here). I usually find Simon one of the more informative posters here, but it's understandable that he sometimes "loses his rag" with some of the forum posters. Now whilst his original response *may* have been over the top, your particular forum has been the source for many idiots posting over the last couple of years who when they don't like the correct answers they are given resort to ill-considered rants. Even worse are the posters who provided incorrect information and take the hump when their errors are pointed out. > I don't see anyone responding to the usenet spam and calling them > w.nkers, Mr. Templar. What's the point? The spammers won't see the posts, and all that reasonably can be done is to report the spam. Adding smart come backs does nothing other than add noise to the group for no good purpose. > Even after I tried to offer an explanation and > apology, the jerk continued with his rants. What I've said about the > scammers, spammers, and rude attitudes here is absolutely true and > Simon Templar proved my point on the last one. That's a matter of opinion, and you're entitled to yours as much as he is. > Once again, I apologize to those of you who have such harsh feelings > about forums in general, and I hope you realize that the forums I [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > carriage, and eventually those who didn't switch over to the automobile > became AMISH. Except that's a pretty poor comparison. Usenet serves the same purpose as an online forum without consuming bandwidth. As I've already said, an online forum also doesn't have the immediacy of usenet. It's just a different way of doing things, not necessarily better or worse, but certainly with advantages. > Mr. Templar, one of the reasons our forums have become so popular is > that we encourage mutual respect among all members. People tend to get > turned off and never return when they see rude people running the show. To be brutally honest, I've seen very little of that when it comes to posts from your forum that end up here or any of the other cellular newsgroups. A moderated forum is never going to be able to effectively police posts (and given that usenet is basically anarchy, nor should it) to usenet, and even if you decide to cancel posts you don't approve of, bear in mind that very few usenet servers honour cancel requests. > Perhaps the newsgroups would not have declined so rapidly over the past > few years if there were fewer Simon Templars running around calling > people w.nkers all the time and flaming people for being > poorly-informed. Perhaps you're right, but I suspect that many usenet groups are declining because the experienced users are fed up with the amount of noise. Anyway, I think you have now proved that you do give a rats a.s about the content of posts by your members, and it's nice to see one of the online forums that feeds to usenet that has some users who care about content and quality. Signature<<< Unlock Your Phone's Potential >>> <<< www.uselessinfo.org.uk >>> <<< www.thephonelocker.co.uk >>> <<< www.gsm-solutions.co.uk >>> Richard Colton Wrote: > "Richard Colton" wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > quality. > No comment on the post before this one... :) We acknowledge that in the past, some of our members got into th usenet groups and caused some ruckus, and we wish that we had been abl to take precautions sooner than we have. When CPF was a new site, a with any new site, we had a period of 'adolescence' that we had t outgrow. Some of our moderators in the past have been young an inexperienced, and yes many of our members have been ignorant to th concept of 'newsgroups' and some may have acted inappropriately here a times. However, IMHO we now have the best team of moderators we've ever ha and the forums are very well-maintained. We don't tolerate member flaming in the forums OR in the newsgroups, and any time this doe occur, we take appropriate action to resolve the issue. In case you'r wondering, TalkNokia has been permanently banned from our site. Thi thread was the final straw, he was already barely skating around ou spam/advertising rules and he knew it. If you ever have a complaint about a cellphoneforums member's behavior please feel free to use our contact form to notify us and the complain will be taken very seriously. Our members are required to follow th same rules here that apply on our site, and bad behavior will not b tolerated. Thank you again for allowing me the opportunity to offer a explanation for this big misunderstanding, and hopefully you ca forgive my own bad behavior directed at Mr. Templar. I'm very loyal t CPF and tend to take direct insults of our site very personally, and can understand that Mr. Templar seems to feel the same way abou alt.cellular.nokia. :) Contact CPF's admins: http://tinyurl.com/qjqx > Thank you for your response, I've seen some of your other posts in the > usenet groups and they have been informative. I'm not sure where I see > that I proved Simon's point, it would be rather ignorant to group me > with those "spoiled children who think the world revolves around them > and owes them everything" if you didn't actually know me. i don't know ask him >You need to > remember that I've been on the defensive from the beginning of this [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > alt.cellular.nokia these days (I assure you Sir I'm not talking about > you, one of the last non-w.nkers around here). really dum if you ask me. How do you get the spammers to give a sh.t > I don't see anyone responding to the usenet spam and calling them > w.nkers, Mr. Templar. wow how cool mk5000 "Well, the bat gets killed by Batman in every single episode, so why worry about how it feels? The velcro would slip off."-- Koala3K |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.