Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Sprint PCS / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tower information

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
itzup2me - 28 Oct 2004 15:18 GMT
I just found this link for Sprint Pcs Towers and I thought it was prett
cool.  If you want to check out the link...here you go.

http://tinyurl.com/64hq
Bob Smith - 28 Oct 2004 16:05 GMT
> I just found this link for Sprint Pcs Towers and I thought it was pretty
> cool.  If you want to check out the link...here you go.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> itzup2me

Bad Link - Here's the correct one -
http://www.sprint.com/pcsbusiness/coverage/towermaps.html

Bob::wondering why "boink" was on the end of that URL?::
larryt510@hotmail.com - 28 Oct 2004 18:42 GMT
Just want to add that Sprint finally updated the tower maps a couple of
weeks ago after no updates for almost a year.  So they're more accurate
now than before.
Bob Smith - 28 Oct 2004 21:13 GMT
> Just want to add that Sprint finally updated the tower maps a couple of
> weeks ago after no updates for almost a year.  So they're more accurate
> now than before.

Speaking of tower maps, I had a link to another web site, that one could
locate all the towers for all the providers that I was going to add to my
prior post. It's no longer in my favorites. I seem to recall it had
"berkina" or something like that within the url, but then again, that could
be wrong.

Anyone have that other link?

Thanks, Bob
Bob Smith - 28 Oct 2004 21:27 GMT
> > Just want to add that Sprint finally updated the tower maps a couple of
> > weeks ago after no updates for almost a year.  So they're more accurate
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Thanks, Bob

Ahhhh, nevermind :) I found it on the web -
http://www.berkana.com/tower.php3

Bob
Steve Sobol - 29 Oct 2004 02:20 GMT
> Ahhhh, nevermind :) I found it on the web -
> http://www.berkana.com/tower.php3

Amazing. Sprint actually has a tower in the northeast corner of Apple Valley
where there are maybe a dozen homes and nothing else. (I'm not kidding.)

No wonder I have such good reception at my house, only a couple miles closer
into town than that tower location.

Now they just need to fix Victorville up by Air Expressway and life will be
perfect. :>

Signature

JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

larryt510@hotmail.com - 29 Oct 2004 02:56 GMT
I won't be satisfied until they add two more sites on Hwy 395 between
Adelanto and Hwy 58.  I hear it's coming soon.  I also hear they have a
tower going up in Ridgecrest right now.
Steve Sobol - 29 Oct 2004 03:01 GMT
> I won't be satisfied until they add two more sites on Hwy 395 between
> Adelanto and Hwy 58.  I hear it's coming soon.  I also hear they have a
> tower going up in Ridgecrest right now.

If they add one near the police station or city hall, it'll cover my problem :)
but that's not between Adelanto and 58, it's in Adelanto.

Signature

JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

David Ward - 30 Oct 2004 21:55 GMT
Another source for tower locations is www.towermaps.com.  Data is not online
unfortunately.

 - David Ward

>> > Just want to add that Sprint finally updated the tower maps a couple of
>> > weeks ago after no updates for almost a year.  So they're more accurate
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Bob
itzup2me - 28 Oct 2004 16:40 GMT
Hey Bob,

thanks for the update...the next time I'll probably skip adding an Ico
in the hyperlink.

Quote of the Day

Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, today is a gift
That's why it is called the present

Author ~ Unknow
itzup2me - 29 Oct 2004 16:08 GMT
Thanks for the Fcc tower information...that's pretty cool and I can se
it helping other people trying to decide between Sprint and the othe
carrier's.:rock
Bob Smith - 29 Oct 2004 16:30 GMT
> Thanks for the Fcc tower information...that's pretty cool and I can see
> it helping other people trying to decide between Sprint and the other
> carrier's.:rock:

One word of advice here, is that you can't judge coverage from Berkana.com's
web site, by trying to find specific cellular provider owned towers, by
doing a search via the carrier.

In the majority of cases, towers are owned by a third party, who leases
tower space from 1 up to 4 different wireless carriers, city or state
governments.

Bob
larryt510@hotmail.com - 29 Oct 2004 19:04 GMT
Not only that but in some markets carriers use other methods of
coverage besides towers such as microcells, cable boxes, and rooftop
and building mounted antennas which would not require FCC registration
and thus would not be found on berkana.com.  In addition towers of less
than 200 ft above sea level are not found on there either as
registration is not required.  Doing some other research I also
discovered that PCS 1900 Mhz towers are not always required to be FCC
registered either (no matter what their height is).  So using
berkana.com is not a very accurate way to find coverage.
Gregg Hill - 30 Oct 2004 07:22 GMT
Use it to look up Verizon towers and it only finds 56 in the entire state of
California. Somehow I doubt its accuracy! Thanks for explaining why the
results were so sparse.

Gregg Hill

> Not only that but in some markets carriers use other methods of
> coverage besides towers such as microcells, cable boxes, and rooftop
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> registered either (no matter what their height is).  So using
> berkana.com is not a very accurate way to find coverage.
Bob Smith - 30 Oct 2004 12:30 GMT
> Use it to look up Verizon towers and it only finds 56 in the entire state of
> California. Somehow I doubt its accuracy! Thanks for explaining why the
> results were so sparse.
>
> Gregg Hill

Oh, it's an accurate database. It just shows who owns the towers, not whose
antennas are on the towers.

Bob
larryt510@hotmail.com - 30 Oct 2004 18:57 GMT
> > Use it to look up Verizon towers and it only finds 56 in the entire state
> of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Bob

Problem is it doesn't even come close to listing every cell tower that
exists (no matter who owns it). I know of many towers here in So. Cal
that are not registered with the FCC.
Steve Sobol - 30 Oct 2004 18:12 GMT
> Use it to look up Verizon towers and it only finds 56 in the entire state of
> California. Somehow I doubt its accuracy! Thanks for explaining why the
> results were so sparse.

There are an awful lot of VZW towers that aren't owned by VZW and therefore
won't show up as VZW towers. Same for most other carriers.

Signature

JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.