Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Sprint PCS / February 2005
Absurd customer service experiance - what would you do?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Kevin - 21 Feb 2005 19:23 GMT I try to make this very long story short..
I used to have a simple flip phone and a retention plan which was $40 including 750 anytime minutes and free wireless web. I thought it was a fair deal.
Last August my phone crashed and I lost all my stored #'s. Since I don't use a land line, that was my whole phone book and a huge PITA. I decided to avoid that hassle again I would get a Treo which I could back up to PC.
When I activated the Treo (300) I was told I'd have to get a Vision plan if I wanted to check email on the phone. I argued that because I had that service and functionality on my old phone included in my plan I didn't feel I should be penalized just because I needed to replace a broken phone by being charged more for the same service I already had. (I don't care about all the vision stuff, just email) I spoke with someone who seemed to understand my point and offered to give me a monthly credit in effect making Vision free. I was careful to be very explicit in the understanding that the deal was not just the customary two month offer, but in fact part of my plan. I hung up satisfied.
A couple of months (December now) later I noticed I was getting charged for vision with no sign of the promised credit. When I called retention I was told that no such offer existed and it was erroneously offered and there was no way to honor that. I tried calling several times to speak with different reps but they all said the same thing. And of course they also said there was no record of that offer having been made in the computer. Finally I spoke with one rep who seemed particularly sympathetic and willing to try to be helpful. He offered me more minutes, but I didn't need that, I thought about what might be useful and asked him about a second line. He said if I upped to a $50 1000 anytime min plan plus $10 vision he could give me a second line and credit me back the $20/mo extra line fee. This seemed to be a fair deal so I agreed to that plan and a 2 Yr contract. Because of my previous experience with "phantom" offers I again made sure to be explicitly crystal clear with our agreement. There was absolutely no mistake in our understanding. He even told me if there were any problems I could call sprint and provide his login ID which he gave me and they could have him contact me himself.
So the first month bill shows up and there is no credit for the $20 add-a-phone fee. I call and explain this to someone who says there is no record of that aspect of the plan, but she would credit my account $30 while she looked into it. She also said she couldn't use the login ID I gave her to contact that earlier rep even though that's what he had told me to do. At that point I paid my bill minus $30.
The next month bill arrives and still there is another new $20 charge for the extra line and also no sign of the promised $30 credit!
I call again and am told there is no record of the $30 credit offer or the free extra line, and again there's no way to use the login ID to contact the earlier rep. I ask to speak to the supervisor and am told the same thing and that there is no such offer that exists anyway (for the free extra line) She offers me $30, I say instead of a $30 token let's try to fix this. She takes that to mean I have "declined" the $30. I finally say, look if there is no way that you can honor the agreement which I agreed to then let me out of my contract. She says no, you will be charged $150 per line if you cancel; early. I ask to speak to her supervisor. So then after going through the whole story with this new manager, who is evidently "the" manager at that call center, she says she can't (won't) do anything because her computer shows that I was getting everything I was supposed to be getting (even though I repeatedly tell her the computer isn't showing everything that was actually promised). It doesn't matter that I had on three previous occasions been clearly and explicitly offered these other things, because they weren't in the computer they don't exist. I pled for even the slightest effort of recognition that Sprint has made errors and in the interest of customer service should at least allow me to get out of my contract, a contract which was agreed to based on different terms than Sprint is honoring. Answer, NO. I ask if she would then at the very least help me contact this initial rep who gave me his login ID. She says she has the capacity to do that but would not because once an issue goes to a manager it doesn't get sent back down to a rep. After going in circles with her for an hour I finally resigned to the fact that I was screwed, If I stayed in the agreement it was going to cost me $240 more than I agreed to over two years, or $300 to get out of a contract based on terms I hadn't agreed to. So I said, ok, since I'm obviously getting nothing else, I'll take the $30. She then said that offer isn't good anymore, you already declined it. !!?!?!?!? I was and am still absolutely stunned at this level of response to what has been a series of SPRINT errors! It's unbelievable and absurd to the point of almost being funny.
The final chapter (for now) is I called back to try one more time to get someone to put me in touch with that earlier rep, and the woman I spoke with at retention this time said, I'm sorry there is a note in your account from the last manager you spoke with to not make ANY more offers of any kind to this customer, including that $30.
What possible recourse do I have? Sprint has made ALL the mistakes here and compounded them one after another, and yet they treat me as though I am a problem customer now basically blacklisting my account. But they have all the leverage? What can I do? What would you do?
Steve Sobol - 21 Feb 2005 19:33 GMT > What possible recourse do I have? Sprint has made ALL the mistakes > here and compounded them one after another, and yet they treat me as > though I am a problem customer now basically blacklisting my account. > But they have all the leverage? What can I do? What would you do? If I had everything properly documented, I'd port my two lines to another carrier (if I needed to keep the numbers), cancel, and sue them for the $300.
But if I had a problem like this, I'd have been documenting everything via certified postal mail. Did you?
 Signature JustThe.net - Apple Valley, CA - http://JustThe.net/ - 888.480.4NET (4638) Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / sjsobol@JustThe.net / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
"In case anyone was wondering, that big glowing globe above the Victor Valley is the sun." -Victorville _Daily Press_ on the unusually large amount of rain the Southland has gotten this winter (January 12th, 2005)
Kevin - 21 Feb 2005 19:55 GMT >> What possible recourse do I have? Sprint has made ALL the mistakes >> here and compounded them one after another, and yet they treat me as [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >But if I had a problem like this, I'd have been documenting everything via >certified postal mail. Did you? I wish. I don't have anything in writing. When I pointed out to them that I never actually signed any contract they said that by using the new phone I had sealed the agreement. That may or may not hold up in court but it's harldy worth the time and expense to find out. I wish I had recorded the calls, at this point I think that's the only thing that would have given me and ground to stand on with them. I won't make the same mistake again, but when I made that deal with that one rep, I really felt like everything was very genuine, especially when he assured me that I could get back in touch with him directly if I had any problems. He said that was something he had never done before. I may be naive, but I still believe he was acting in good faith, and just perhaps that he was making promises he didn't know couldn't be kept.
Isaiah Beard - 25 Feb 2005 14:32 GMT >>But if I had a problem like this, I'd have been documenting everything via >>certified postal mail. Did you? > > I wish. I don't have anything in writing. When I pointed out to them > that I never actually signed any contract they said that by using the > new phone I had sealed the agreement. I really don't beleive that by using the phone, you could be "sealing the agreement." If that were true, Sprint could lock us all into 20year agreements with $3 million termination fees any time without ever notifying anyone, and we'd be "sealing the agreement" by using the phone. Not reasonable, so I would call the CS rep's bluff and fight it.
> That may or may not hold up in > court but it's harldy worth the time and expense to find out. Small claims court could easily handle this case, and filing fees are minimal (and you could also including the filing fees in your damages to get it all back). This is of course, fi you really think you have a valid case.
> I had recorded the calls, at this point I think that's the only thing > that would have given me and ground to stand on with them. I won't > make the same mistake again, but when I made that deal with that one > rep, I really felt like everything was very genuine, especially when > he assured me that I could get back in touch with him directly if I > had any problems. He said that was something he had never done before. That right there would have set off alarm bells in my head, that he's never done this before. If he hasn't then how does he know it's going to work this time?
My general rule of thumb in dealing with any company is, if the offer is not published somwhere in writing, if I can't print it out or otherwise have it on a piece of paper that I can hold in my hands, then I do not trust the offer as valid. This is why I have an objection to the retention department in general. Not only is it a haven for people who have little in the way of valid complaints (yours excluded), but it's rife with these oral, unverifiable, backdoor deals that only cause problems for everyone involved later.
> I may be naive, but I still believe he was acting in good faith, and > just perhaps that he was making promises he didn't know couldn't be > kept. I agree with that, that probably is the case. Even so, if there were methods for Sprint to deliver these promises in writing this wouldn't be a problem.
 Signature E-mail fudged to thwart spammers. Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.
Steve Sobol - 26 Feb 2005 16:28 GMT > I really don't beleive that by using the phone, you could be "sealing > the agreement." If that were true, Sprint could lock us all into 20year > agreements with $3 million termination fees any time without ever > notifying anyone, and we'd be "sealing the agreement" by using the > phone. Not reasonable, so I would call the CS rep's bluff and fight it. No, such agreements are used pretty regularly. Doesn't mean Sprint can change the terms of the plan without notifying you unless the contract states that they can....
 Signature JustThe.net - Apple Valley, CA - http://JustThe.net/ - 888.480.4NET (4638) Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / sjsobol@JustThe.net / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
"In case anyone was wondering, that big glowing globe above the Victor Valley is the sun." -Victorville _Daily Press_ on the unusually large amount of rain the Southland has gotten this winter (January 12th, 2005)
Tinman - 21 Feb 2005 19:44 GMT <snip typical SPCS selective memory tale>
> What possible recourse do I have? Sprint has made ALL the mistakes > here and compounded them one after another, and yet they treat me as > though I am a problem customer now basically blacklisting my account. > But they have all the leverage? What can I do? What would you do? I would first ask to see/hear your agreement to the new contract terms. If they can't or won't provide this, which is likely, I would file an official complaint with your State's Attorney General. Let SPCS know, calmly and without emotion, that this is what you intend to do. A mistake is one thing, but this has gotten to the point, IMNSHO, of criminal fraud.
Even though I am a SPCS subscriber, and in general like the service, I have witnessed first-hand the "no record of that conversion" situation on countless occasions. It's to the point where I don't think I would listen to a SPCS CSR offer me anything--without recording the darn call.
During my last contract "update" nothing I was offered showed up on my account. Fortunately, my contract expiration date had not been altered. Since I don't exceed my AT minutes as it is, it wasn't a big deal. Plus, I was given an instant $300 credit to buy new phones, in order to avoid waiting on a rebate (my rebate status was still several months away). Regardless, I wasted a good hour on the phone, and didn't really need new phones anyway (certainly could have waited a few months). The next time I go through this crap, I am telling the rep right up front that I am recording the call, and I'll ask for a complete run-down on what is supposed to occur.
But what I don't understand, is why SPCS can't just shoot off an email detailing what transpired. Forcing customers to speak with multiple reps, most often repeating the same story over and over, has got to me a waste of time and resources--if not lost sales. I am interested in trying Ready Link, but there's no chance I'll add it via a CSR. Since I can't find an easy option to add it on the Web site, I'll do without.
YMMV, IMHO, etc., etc.
 Signature Mike | Have you ever imagined a world with no | hypothetical situations?
Kevin - 21 Feb 2005 20:04 GMT >I would first ask to see/hear your agreement to the new contract terms. >If they can't or won't provide this, which is likely, I would file an >official complaint with your State's Attorney General. Let SPCS know, >calmly and without emotion, that this is what you intend to do. Good idea, I'll try that.
>A >mistake is one thing, but this has gotten to the point, IMNSHO, of >criminal fraud. It certainly feels that way, only without any documentation on my part I wouldn't think I have much of a case.
>Even though I am a SPCS subscriber, and in general like the service, I've always felt the same way. As I said, my previous retention deal seemed very fair, as did the deal I thought I was getting with the second line. One thing I've noticed, they definitely seem to care about keeping customers happy when you don't have a contract. They are almost taunting me with the position they have me in now that I'm theirs for two years.
> I >have witnessed first-hand the "no record of that conversion" situation >on countless occasions. It's to the point where I don't think I would >listen to a SPCS CSR offer me anything--without recording the darn call.
>During my last contract "update" nothing I was offered showed up on my >account. Fortunately, my contract expiration date had not been altered. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >am recording the call, and I'll ask for a complete run-down on what is >supposed to occur. I wouldn't have thought that necessary but obviously it is. I've always gone through the complete rundown to make sure it was clear, I had always thought that would have been good enough, but recording the calls sure would have been helpful now.
>But what I don't understand, is why SPCS can't just shoot off an email >detailing what transpired. Forcing customers to speak with multiple >reps, most often repeating the same story over and over, has got to me a >waste of time and resources--if not lost sales. The efficiency (let alone the efficacy) of their CS dept. is unbelievably ridiculous. Maybe it's a tactic, make the experience so frustrating that fewer people bother to make the call.
Thanks for the ideas.
John Richards - 22 Feb 2005 01:59 GMT >>I would first ask to see/hear your agreement to the new contract terms. >>If they can't or won't provide this, which is likely, I would file an >>official complaint with your State's Attorney General. Let SPCS know, >>calmly and without emotion, that this is what you intend to do. > > Good idea, I'll try that. Besides your own AG, I'd also file with the AG in the state where Sprint PCS has its headquarters. Likewise, file with that state's BBB. Both AG's and BBB's often have online web forms for complaint submittal. By following this course of action I got Dell to capitulate on fixing a bad computer under warranty.
 Signature John Richards
Joseph Huber - 22 Feb 2005 00:46 GMT On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:44:08 -0700, "Tinman" wrote
>Even though I am a SPCS subscriber, and in general like the service, I >have witnessed first-hand the "no record of that conversion" situation [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >During my last contract "update" nothing I was offered showed up on my >account. As an alternative, you might try email. When I worked out my last retention plan, I did the whole thing via email with Sprint Customer service. When I activated the phone and was talking to the CS rep, she claimed that she could not implement one part of the retention plan, and offered me something else that was not nearly as good. I kindly told her no, that I have the retention plan in an email, and that I would take it up with customer service via email. After a couple of more emails, the retention plan was implemented as agreed to.
These days, I try to do everything with Sprint via email.
Joe Huber huber.joseph@comcast.net
John Richards - 22 Feb 2005 02:05 GMT > On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:44:08 -0700, "Tinman" wrote >>During my last contract "update" nothing I was offered showed up on my [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > These days, I try to do everything with Sprint via email. I've done regular plan changes and inquiries via email, but this is the first I heard of doing a retention plan via email. Is there anything special in the way you address that email so you get a retention specialist rather than a regular CSR?
 Signature John Richards
Joseph Huber - 22 Feb 2005 03:59 GMT On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:05:32 GMT, "John Richards" >
>I've done regular plan changes and inquiries via email, but this is >the first I heard of doing a retention plan via email. Is there >anything special in the way you address that email so you get a >retention specialist rather than a regular CSR? I sent in a regular request via the website indicating that my contract was up, that Wireless Web no longer suited my needs, and that I was considering switching to Verizon because they offer plans that allow phone/laptop use. I asked if Sprint had anything similar to the Verizion plans. The reply from Sprint indicated that they had no plans similar to the Verizon plans, but they offered me some discounts/additional minutes becuase I had been a loyal customer for several years. There were several emails back and forth as I asked for some more features/discounts.
I really don't know if I was speaking to a retention specialist or not, but the person dealing with me was able to "negotiate", and to give me discounts that the phone CSR rep was supposedly not able to implement.
Joe Huber huber.joseph@comcast.net
John Richards - 23 Feb 2005 06:50 GMT > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:05:32 GMT, "John Richards" > >>I've done regular plan changes and inquiries via email, but this is [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > give me discounts that the phone CSR rep was supposedly not able to > implement. The key to your success (reaching someone who was empowered to negotiate) was probably that: a) your contract was up, and b) you gave a valid reason for being interested in switching to Verizon.
 Signature John Richards
Kevin - 23 Feb 2005 13:52 GMT >On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:44:08 -0700, "Tinman" wrote >>Even though I am a SPCS subscriber, and in general like the service, I [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >These days, I try to do everything with Sprint via email. Thanks for that suggestion. I have always just assumed that I was much better off talking to a live person then dealing in email. I also made the assumption that email support staff might be the least experienced and the least empowered. I must have been wrong.
After reading the replies to my post here, I emailed sprint with the same account of the situation, and amazingly they wrote back EXTREMELY apologetic and said that my account has now been changed to reflect the terms to which I actually agreed, ie free second line. And furthermore they have credited me $55 for the overcharge of the 2nd line up to this point. So basically they have made everything right. The only thing I could still be irritated about is the enormous amount of time and frustration I had to go through to fix this which shouldn't have been necessary in the first place. But under the circumstances, I'll let that go if this is truly done. I'll await my next invoice and see... but at least now I have IN WRITING from sprint a clear outlining of the terms of my plan.
I have no idea who designed their phone CS system but it is an absolute nightmare.
Thanks for all the ideas here.
Mike Paige - 27 Feb 2005 01:15 GMT <nsip>
> waste of time and resources--if not lost sales. I am interested in > trying Ready Link, but there's no chance I'll add it via a CSR. Since I > can't find an easy option to add it on the Web site, I'll do without. The website isn't without problems either. I added 1000 Night/Weekend minutes to my plan from the web. After it went into effect, I checked my account from the website and observed that the minutes were listed as "shared" on my primary phone, and there was not way to add minutes to the two add-a-phones on my account. However; the bill from the first month had about $55 in charges for extra minutes on the other two phones. I'll skip the long story. It turned out that the problem was my plan was so old that the minutes couldn't be shared, or even applied to any phone except the primary one. I was refunded the $55 and switched to a Fair and Flexible plan that does what I want, and got a couple of other "goodies". I have not received the second bill yet, and the new plan kicks in tomorrow, so the story is not completely done yet.
If I had talked to a CSR to make the change it would have been discovered right then that it couldn't be done. The web didn't do that.
Not-so-good things summary: Web didn't do what it looked like it should. Web didn't make clear what was actually done. Call dropped with first CSR. 2 1/2 hours to find out problem. (CSR had to go to multiple levels of support.)
Good things summary: Both CSR were courteous, professional, and helpful. The cause of the problem was discovered (antique plan). A change was made to fix the problem (new plan). In the end, I got what I thought I had ordered (refunds made). (Assuming that the next two bills look like what I expect.)
Overall, at this point, I'm satisfied.
Jerome Zelinske - 22 Feb 2005 00:43 GMT You did not need to replace the phone. You were charged more, but it was not the same service.
|
|
|