> Why such a negativism? What's wrong with Razr or Motorola
Motorola makes complete junk. RF performance is good, generally (but even
that's not true of my T-Mobile Moto V188, its RF section sucks a.s), but you
pay out the wazoo for a phone and the fit-and-finish of the phone are
uniformly horrible no matter which phone you get. Then there are the
occasional big software issues like the ones with the original Verizon
Wireless Moto T720 and the T-Mo Moto V180.

Signature
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Company website: http://JustThe.net/
Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
E: sjsobol@JustThe.net Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307
Mij Adyaw - 20 Nov 2005 19:19 GMT
The best phone phone from an RF and ruggedness perspective that I ever had
was a Motorola V CDMA phone.
>> Why such a negativism? What's wrong with Razr or Motorola
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> occasional big software issues like the ones with the original Verizon
> Wireless Moto T720 and the T-Mo Moto V180.
Steve Sobol - 21 Nov 2005 04:08 GMT
> The best phone phone from an RF and ruggedness perspective that I ever had
> was a Motorola V CDMA phone.
My CDMA StarTAC 7760 did very well in the RF department too. You just
couldn't drop it, scratch it, do anything else to it - hell, you could
barely dial the thing without it falling apart.
That's always been my problem with Motos, and now I'm on my third V188 and
it doesn't even hold calls well. We should have gotten the free Nokia 3220s
instead. :>

Signature
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Company website: http://JustThe.net/
Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
E: sjsobol@JustThe.net Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307
mike - 20 Nov 2005 20:32 GMT
Steve, thanks for response.
My primary and the only reason for having cell phone is talking. So
quality of sound and reception is the main points how I judge the
phone. Everything else is of no interest to me. For everything else I
have a computer and photo cameras. So if a phone needs some software
update to make it play game better or for some other reason -I
don't generally care as long as I can talk without interruption and
lost signal.
Having said that I always had an old Sanyo 4000 phone with sprint. Then
at some point switched to new (at that time) Samsung phones (sorry,
don't remember the model number). Those were not free phones; I
always pay for my phones and never buy cheap things. So, I only
switched the phones, service stayed the same. Guess what - I could
not get a signal in my own house after the switch, reception in all
other areas were very bad. After few months of discussion with Sprint
reps I simply went back to my old Sanyo phone. Everything went back to
normal - perfect reception everywhere.
Sorry, but after that I don't have much faith in Samsung phones. And
what I have heard about Motorola phones so far was that their reception
is far superior than most of the other brands.
Of course pone is not the only component that is responsible for good
reception. The other one is the network. And Sprint so far is pretty
good in my area (upstate NY), and some other states that I visit
sometimes. Unfortunately Sprint does not have Razr (and probably wont),
so I might take a risk and switch to Cingular just because of the phone
and see if their network is as good in my areas as Sprint.
Any comments are greatly appreciated.