>> And my three lines cost me about $5 bucks less than I was paying under the
>> old ATTWS rates. Better call quality, new free phones, and a lower price!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Is $5 a month *THAT* critical?
Depending upon the features you use and how you use them, it can be MUCH more
than that.

Signature
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
DecaturTxCowboy - 21 Apr 2006 15:12 GMT
>>> And my three lines cost me about $5 bucks less than I was paying under the
>>> old ATTWS rates. Better call quality, new free phones, and a lower price!
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Depending upon the features you use and how you use them, it can be MUCH more
> than that.
Very true as we don't know what features he has added, but I was mostly
pointing to the $5 advantage he keeps referring to assuming he has
similar features he's comparing too.
Scott - 22 Apr 2006 02:05 GMT
>>>> And my three lines cost me about $5 bucks less than I was paying under
>>>> the old ATTWS rates. Better call quality, new free phones, and a lower
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> pointing to the $5 advantage he keeps referring to assuming he has similar
> features he's comparing too.
I think his point had to do with the additional cost of getting the same
service with Cingular.
>> And my three lines cost me about $5 bucks less than I was paying under
>> the old ATTWS rates. Better call quality, new free phones, and a lower
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Is $5 a month *THAT* critical?
$5 isn't the issue, nor is the issue of low feature entry leven phones. From
what I can gather, it's better quality calls for the OP. After all, anyone
can have the cheapest rate plan or most expensive rate plan available, but
if they can't make or receive calls, then what good is the service.
Bob
DecaturTxCowboy - 22 Apr 2006 16:32 GMT
>> Is $5 a month *THAT* critical?
>
> $5 isn't the issue, nor is the issue of low feature entry leven phones. From
> what I can gather, it's better quality calls for the OP. After all, anyone
> can have the cheapest rate plan or most expensive rate plan available, but
> if they can't make or receive calls, then what good is the service.
I agree the most important factor is Sprint works better for him.
But to start flaming Cingular/ATTW with non-issue items was getting
ridiculous.
I've always maintained that 10,000 minutes for $60 a month (yes, that
what an MCI mailed flyer implied, until you read the 10,000 minutes was
per year), unlimited M2M, 7:00 nights/weekends, the coolest phone ...all
mean nothing if it doesn't work where you use it the most.
Jeremy - 23 Apr 2006 00:51 GMT
>>> And my three lines cost me about $5 bucks less than I was paying under
>>> the old ATTWS rates. Better call quality, new free phones, and a lower
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Bob
I should have been more specific--most of the ATTWS customers had pretty
good deals from AT&T. Lots of bonus minutes, free M2M, 7PM N/W, etc. So it
was significant that I could get a current rate plan that could beat out my
previous ATTWS rate.
Cingular couldn't/wouldn't come near that price.