I can imagine some people would rather starve to death first.
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/wildlife/article2449968.ece
In news:VcGdnYE0te5aBL_bnZ2dnUVZ_ragnZ2d@comcast.com "EOO"
<whereeverforever.com> wrote:
> I can imagine some people would rather starve to death first.
>
> http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/wildlife/article2449968.ece
The US isn't anywhere near the top of the list of per-capita cellphone
use, is it?
Then, if it's really related to cellphones, why would the problem start
here?
And, what's so special about cellphones? The world has been pretty much
saturated with RF for decades.

Signature
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com
EOO - 15 Apr 2007 23:57 GMT
"Bert Hyman" <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in message
> The US isn't anywhere near the top of the list of per-capita cellphone
> use, is it?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> And, what's so special about cellphones? The world has been pretty much
> saturated with RF for decades.
There may be something to it. I used to walk my dog over at the park where
there is a cell tower. She always gravitated towards the tower. I would
try to steer her away and she would always head back to the tower. It was
weird.
Who knows?
John R. Copeland - 16 Apr 2007 01:56 GMT
> There may be something to it. I used to walk my dog over at the park where
> there is a cell tower. She always gravitated towards the tower. I would
> try to steer her away and she would always head back to the tower. It was
> weird.
>
> Who knows?
I'd bet your dog thought a "fire hydrant" that big
should attract some really hunky studs.
Todd Allcock - 16 Apr 2007 05:27 GMT
> There may be something to it. I used to walk my dog over at the park where
> there is a cell tower. She always gravitated towards the tower. I would
> try to steer her away and she would always head back to the tower. It was
> weird.
>
> Who knows?
Perhaps the dog's heightened senses were attracted to RF energy...
...or perhaps he smelled the urine of 50,000 dogs that peed on the tower
before he did.
Who knows? :-)
Here's another, less dramatic, possibility:
a.. Pesticides linked to honeybee population decline
Pesticide Action Network Updates Service, February 22, 2007
Bees are critically important to farm ecosystems because of their role as
pollinators that allow crops to produce edible fruit and seed. Colony
Collapse Disorder (CCD) is a phenomenon described by beekeepers, researchers
and government officials when entire hive populations seem to disappear,
apparently dying out. A CCD working group was recently formed with
researchers from the University of Montana, The Pennsylvania State
University, the USDA/ARS, the Florida Department of Agriculture, and the
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture to analyze the problem. Their
preliminary report indicates how pesticides may be a factor, specifically
neonicotinioid pesticides, including imidacloprid, clothianiden and
thiamethoxam. According to the CCD report, "If bees are eating fresh or
stored pollen contaminated with these chemicals at low levels, they may not
cause mortality but may impact the bee's ability to learn or make memories.
If this is the case, young bees leaving the hive to make orientation flights
may not be able to learn the location of the hive and may not be returning
causing the colonies to dwindle and eventually die." Porterville Recorder
reporter Sarah Elizabeth Villicana interviewed a Terra Bella, California
beekeeper, Eric Lane, who suspects harm to the bees is linked to
imidacloprid, made by Bayer CropScience. "It is my personal belief that this
chemical is responsible for thinning the bee population," Lane said. "It was
used it France and killed 70 percent of the bee population in France."
> I can imagine some people would rather starve to death first.
>
> http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/wildlife/article2449968.ece
I'm going to get more phones now. I hate bees.