 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Sprint PCS / June 2007Want Best-receiving phone
I want a phone that has top-notch reception. I DON'T want a flip-fone, camera, mp3 player, or any of that crap. I simply want a PHONE that is the best-receiving phone in the Sprint line. Any suggestions? Thanks then you have to settle for a flip phone the best sprint has with out all the toys is the sanyo katana -- AL'S COMPUTERS > I want a phone that has top-notch reception. I DON'T want a flip-fone, > camera, mp3 player, or any of that crap. I simply want a PHONE that is [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Thanks The Motorola Razr is also quite good. Too bad the Katana doesn't have Power Vision. > then you have to settle for a flip phone > the best sprint has with out all the toys is the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >> Thanks >The Motorola Razr is also quite good. Too bad the Katana doesn't have Power >Vision. > >> then you have to settle for a flip phone >> the best sprint has with out all the toys is the >> sanyo katana I think the OP is saying that all that's needed is a really good handset for voice calling - one that grabs and holds a signal, and nothing more. If Vision/Web access isn't important, the best is still a Sanyo. I have a 4920 to sell, and that would fit the bill. I don't know if you can still get them directly from Sprint. I imagine there are quite a few on Ebay. DGI >>The Motorola Razr is also quite good. Too bad the Katana doesn't have >>Power Vision. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > DGI We're also hooked on Sanyos here for their great receivers. The sensitivity is impressive. We have one SCP-200 and two SCP-3100's on the plan. The "200" is the most basic one. All work great. I had an LG PM-325 a couple of years ago. The receiver was never very sensitive, and it got worse after one year. By "receiver" I mean radio receiver for signal acquisition. Sometimes I think receiver can refer to the unit in general. Hope this helps. oj >> The Motorola Razr is also quite good. Too bad the Katana doesn't have Power >> Vision. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > DGI David, You hit the nail on the head! Yes, I had read about the Sanyo's, and the Katana in particular. Currently have an SCP 3100 that isn't very impressive as far as a communications transceiver. I'll check out the 4920. Just curious: how old is your 4920? What comes with it? How much? Many thanks. Lakeside >Just curious: how old is your 4920? What comes with it? How much? It was my wife's and she barely used it. I bought it right after they first came out, I think January '05. More importantly I have the life-timer figure somewhere and the mileage is practically nil. I have no accessories, just a second battery that's almost brand new (long story). It's in perfect condition, and I'm flexy. I was hanging on to it as a fallback if I lost or destroyed my 8300. Please feel free to mail me directly. DGI the new katana 2 due out in august DOES:) -- AL'S COMPUTERS > The Motorola Razr is also quite good. Too bad the Katana doesn't have Power > Vision. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >> > >> Thanks |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.