> > Thanks for the info and you sold me on a copy of PDANET.
> >
> > Now I can use my Mogul for DUN for another hand held device.
> >
> It is worth every penny, and I do like to reward authors of good quality
> shareware.
>> > Thanks for the info and you sold me on a copy of PDANET.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> necessary on those devices. I don't know why that seems to have been
> changed in Windows Mobile.
Because WM6 now uses PAN (Personal Area Network) instead of DUN. There
should be an app called "Internet Sharing" on the device.
The advantage of PAN is any idiot can use it- you fire up Internet Sharing
with the device pluged into to USB (or bluetooth) and the phone acts like a
network adapter to connect you to the internet (it acts more like a cellular
datacard than a modem.)
The disadvantages of PAN are, a) most other mobile devices can't use it, so
you can't hook up a PPC to a WM6 phone, for example, and b) the PC
connecting to the device must have Activesync or WMDC installed (because the
drivers are integrated into the sync software.)
The joys of Windows Mobile upgrades- two steps forward, one step back. ;-)
Roger 2008 - 14 Mar 2008 00:51 GMT
> >> > Thanks for the info and you sold me on a copy of PDANET.
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> The joys of Windows Mobile upgrades- two steps forward, one step back. ;-)
Exactly and I especially agree with your "disadvantages" paragraph since I'm
thinking of getting an HP IPAQ 211 without it's own internet.
BTW I just looked up "BT DUN" on the internet and found: "Why did we remove
Bluetooth DUN?".
http://blogs.msdn.com/windowsmobile/archive/2007/04/17/why-did-we-remove-bluetoo
th-dun.aspx
It makes it look like they are trying to blame the OEMs for removing BT DUN.
Either way, it is not very fun trying to work around things that have
changed.
Todd Allcock - 14 Mar 2008 03:25 GMT
>> The disadvantages of PAN are, a) most other mobile devices can't use it,
>> so you can't hook up a PPC to a WM6 phone, for example, and b) the PC
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Either way, it is not very fun trying to work around things that have
> changed.
I almost added "PAN is easier for wireless carriers to disable" under
"advantages" (with tongue planted firmly in cheek!) Any carrier that wants
to disallow tethering external devices now simply has to remove the Internet
Sharing applet, rather than try to cripple the bluetooth stack or functions,
so it has major advantages over BT DUN for wireless OEMs. (Ironically, IR
DUN generally still works fine, however, if you can leave both devices
aligned on a desk.)
Roger 2008 - 14 Mar 2008 14:00 GMT
> >> The disadvantages of PAN are, a) most other mobile devices can't use it,
> >> so you can't hook up a PPC to a WM6 phone, for example, and b) the PC
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > remove
> > Bluetooth DUN?".
http://blogs.msdn.com/windowsmobile/archive/2007/04/17/why-did-we-remove-bluetoo
th-dun.aspx
> > It makes it look like they are trying to blame the OEMs for removing BT
> > DUN.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> DUN generally still works fine, however, if you can leave both devices
> aligned on a desk.)
I used to use the IR port for transfering small files until I found out just
recently I could use BT for the same thing.
BTW you wouldn't want the Sprint "Touch" because it doesn't have an IR port
or WiFi for that matter.
Todd Allcock - 14 Mar 2008 20:13 GMT
> I used to use the IR port for transfering small files until I found out
> just
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> port
> or WiFi for that matter.
I'll add those to the (long) list of why I don't want a Sprint touch! ;-)
DTC - 14 Mar 2008 02:51 GMT
> The joys of Windows Mobile upgrades- two steps forward, one step back. ;-)
Old news...remember the MS DOS upgrade from 3 to 4? HAH HAH HAH
Todd Wade - 23 Mar 2008 00:40 GMT
On Mar 13, 6:44 pm, "Todd Allcock" <eleccon...@AmericaOnLine.com>
wrote:
> Because WM6 now uses PAN (Personal Area Network) instead of DUN. There
> should be an app called "Internet Sharing" on the device.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The joys of Windows Mobile upgrades- two steps forward, one step back. ;-)
There is a thread on ppcgeeks.com that has the WModem application and
drivers all bundled up:
http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=11146
Reading through it sounds a bit confusing but all I had to do after
downloading the zip file was the "Installing the Missing Files"
section and it worked just fine.
This way you can use the device as a generic modem instead of having
to install ActiveSync and avoid the problems/unwantedness that
accompany it.
Todd W.
Roger 2008 - 31 Mar 2008 20:12 GMT
> On Mar 13, 6:44 pm, "Todd Allcock" <eleccon...@AmericaOnLine.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Todd W.
Many Thanks for that link!
I know you posted a few days ago but I finally got around to trying a file
in that "zip file" myself today.
Turns out all I needed to do was install the CAB file out of the directory
named "Bluetooth DialUp Access" and do a soft reset.
The cool thing about that BT DUN is I don't have the same problems I had
with PDANET where I have to restart devices after a connection or where I
have to have a laptop to install it in the first place.
I know not everybody wants or needs BT DUN because the "Internet Sharing"
via "Bluetooth PAN" will work in most cases, but that isn't me so Thanks
again.