Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / T-Mobile / September 2004
What gsm phone has the best rf receiption for T moblie?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Bob 1 - 03 Sep 2004 11:08 GMT Ok the topic says all, well almost I problelly going to pick up the phon e off of ebay so if not one t mobile currently carrys thats ok . I live in a area were almost all cell companys have so so receiption (verizon too) So I need a rf receiption champ to help me out. thanx Bob S.
a - 03 Sep 2004 16:08 GMT Nokia 3650/3660
> Ok the topic says all, well almost I problelly going to pick up the phon > e off of ebay so if not one t mobile currently carrys thats ok . I live > in a area were almost all cell companys have so so receiption (verizon > too) So I need a rf receiption champ to help me out. thanx Bob S. Bob 1 - 03 Sep 2004 19:26 GMT > Nokia 3650/3660 > >>Ok the topic says all, well almost I problelly going to pick up the phon >>e off of ebay so if not one t mobile currently carrys thats ok . I live >>in a area were almost all cell companys have so so receiption (verizon >>too) So I need a rf receiption champ to help me out. thanx Bob S. Ok thanx , my fault I should have mention that Im not really interested in camera phone or weird unconventional laid out phones like the 3650/3660. Im looking for a good candy bar or flip phone style fairly compact (not dinky though) and perfer it not to have a camera (because cameras drive the price up to much for so little usefulness). Thanx again for the reply and any constructive posts are welcome . thanx Bob S.
Joseph - 04 Sep 2004 03:18 GMT >Ok thanx , my fault I should have mention that Im not really interested >in camera phone or weird unconventional laid out phones like the >3650/3660. The 3660 is *not* unconventional and has the same 4 X 3 keypad that most phones have.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cyrus Afzali - 05 Sep 2004 20:25 GMT >> Nokia 3650/3660 >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >cameras drive the price up to much for so little usefulness). Thanx >again for the reply and any constructive posts are welcome . thanx Bob S. If you want a "candy bar" style, I'd go with the Nokia 6610. I've gotten great reception, it's a tri-band and has WAP capabilities. It's the best phone I've ever had and the one I've used longest.
Charles Hawtrey - 04 Sep 2004 01:53 GMT Bob 1 <ThatWouldBeTelling@DrakeIsSix.com> climbed onto an orange crate and shouted:
>Ok the topic says all, well almost I problelly going to pick up the phon >e off of ebay so if not one t mobile currently carrys thats ok . I live >in a area were almost all cell companys have so so receiption (verizon >too) So I need a rf receiption champ to help me out. thanx Bob S. Best RF reception for T-Mo is the good old Motorola P280/T280. No longer available through the usual channels but can be had through Ebay, or occasionally other places if you ask around. Our town has very mediocre service with T-Mo and my P280 holds connections (or held, before it broke) where the other phones in our family don't even get service at all. I'm so completely sold on the P280 that I'm buying another now that my first one has broken due to age and abuse.
The P280 does not have a camera or color screen. I consider the lack of those features to be an advantage...
The Ericsson R520m is supposed to have excellent RF too but I have no personal experience with it.
-- "Dude, we totally forgot our slogan..." ~ Medical Marijuana Association Billboard
Bob 1 - 04 Sep 2004 04:32 GMT > Bob 1 <ThatWouldBeTelling@DrakeIsSix.com> climbed onto an orange crate > and shouted: [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > "Dude, we totally forgot our slogan..." ~ Medical Marijuana Association > Billboard thanx guys keep the ideas rolling.
jsstuffNO@SPAMrochester.rr.com - 04 Sep 2004 18:19 GMT I've used the following:
Motorola P280 Motorola v60 Samsung N210 (I think, it's been a while and it was terrible anyway. Nokia 6610
All on T-Mobile and without a doubt the 6610 is the best of the lot. I couldn't use the P280 at home, even though it was rated as a very good RF phone. I use the 6610 all the time at home. Still spotty service but at least i can use it.
So far, I'd vote for the 6610 if you can find one. No longer on the T-Mobile site.
John
Charles Hawtrey - 05 Sep 2004 00:38 GMT jsstuffNO@SPAMrochester.rr.com climbed onto an orange crate and shouted:
>I've used the following: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >So far, I'd vote for the 6610 if you can find one. No longer on the >T-Mobile site. Thanks for the head-to-head comparison. I've heard that the 6610 is good but have had trouble finding solid info on its RF -- it seems most reviews focus on the number of voices in the polyphonic ringtones and other such fluff.
I've also read that unlike most other color phones, the 6610's screen is readable in daylight. Would you agree?
-- "Dude, we totally forgot our slogan..." ~ Medical Marijuana Association Billboard
LEM - 05 Sep 2004 01:53 GMT > Thanks for the head-to-head comparison. I've heard that the 6610 is > good but have had trouble finding solid info on its RF -- it seems [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I've also read that unlike most other color phones, the 6610's screen > is readable in daylight. Would you agree? I have 4 Nokia 6610's in our household, and they work great! Never a reception problem, though we live in a pretty spotty area. One day I was talking to CS rep at 2nd level, who was trying to trobleshoot some other thing with my account (not phone related), and he wanted to check which tower my phone was currently connected to. So he asked for my exact location (what intersection is the nearest), and said in a very surprized voice, that his map shows me as being on a very margin of coverage (like between 2 towers, where each is on a boundary of their range). None the less -- the phones work great all around the house, even in stairwells, where there's no windows near at all. Sometimes I do lose a signal in the house, but hey... when I had Sprint and their Samsung phone, I could only talk when near a right window (I know they use different towers, but I think they are all in the same general area).
Display. Hm... I never thought of it... I never had any issues with display. I guess it never occured to me with my 6610, that it is "supposed" to be hard to read the display under certain conditions... Definetly no problems under daylight that I can recall I just get it out and use!
The only problems with this particular phone are size related, and are based on your preferences. For one thing my mother can't read the display without her eyeglasses, except for a phone book, which has a very nice setting for just such persons, that displays names in very large font across the entire screen. And my wife has trouble finding her phone in the purse, but, and that's the only negative things about it. I love my phone, and have no troubles whatsoever!
LEM. (NG replies preferred, but to e-mail me, remove all digits from address)
Cyrus Afzali - 05 Sep 2004 20:28 GMT >jsstuffNO@SPAMrochester.rr.com climbed onto an orange crate and >shouted: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >most reviews focus on the number of voices in the polyphonic ringtones >and other such fluff. I've had solid RF performance from mine. Granted, you don't usually read such info. in reviews, because honestly most people don't know whether they're getting it or not. They often focus on the "service" as the issue if they're getting dropped calls.
>I've also read that unlike most other color phones, the 6610's screen >is readable in daylight. Would you agree? I use mine outdoors all the time with no trouble. Obviously, in harsh sunlight, you're going to have some issues, but they're easily gotten around by holding at a different angle most of the time.
One thing to look out with the 6610 is it's screen. I've found it's relatively easy to scratch. Having said that, once I had a few initial ones, it's never really been much of an issue and it's never impaired the screen viewing.
jsstuffNO@SPAMrochester.rr.com - 06 Sep 2004 12:16 GMT > Thanks for the head-to-head comparison. I've heard that the 6610 is > good but have had trouble finding solid info on its RF -- it seems [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I've also read that unlike most other color phones, the 6610's screen > is readable in daylight. Would you agree? It's not a very high resolution color screen, and sure it washes out in bright sunlight as any screen would. Of course we only have about 7 sunny days a year here..
The downsides to the 6610 that I can think of:
1. Tiny Power switch, an annoyance really. 2. proprietary headphone jack (they call it a POP Port and you need it for the included FM radio - nice touch.
I travel internationally with it, and it is really the best phone I've used. Verizon phones included.
Joseph - 06 Sep 2004 16:40 GMT >I travel internationally with it, and it is really the best phone I've >used. Verizon phones included. What is this supposed to mean? Verizon phones cannot travel internationally. If you meant it was better than the phones offered by Verizon that's not hard considering that Verizon has some of the poorest choice of phones of any carrier.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bob 1 - 06 Sep 2004 19:23 GMT >>I travel internationally with it, and it is really the best phone I've >>used. Verizon phones included. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > yes I use verizon now. Verizon phones suck monkey nuts, big, overpriced striped of features.low quality, pos(and thats being kind). Althought verizon has the largest network in the US they cripple it with crappy equipment. and sense cdma has about zero use outside the US and a few asian countries and gsm phone is a better world traveler.
John Klug - 07 Sep 2004 03:03 GMT > The Ericsson R520m is supposed to have excellent RF too but I have no > personal experience with it. We have the R520m with the pull up antenna, and it is much better than the old Nokia 5190 and the new Nokia 3595. The standard off the shell R520m is not much better than average. The last time I saw an antenna (IAT-10) sold on E-Bay it was over $100, and much pricier than the phone itself.
The R520m does not have much volume, and most of the time when you use bluetooth, the volume goes to the minimum setting. Also, bluetooth occasionally hangs and you have to power the phone off and on again. It is a lousy speakerphone, due to the lack of volume.
If you can get the extendable antenna, it is worth the other aggravations.
Dave Stone - 04 Sep 2004 11:18 GMT > Ok the topic says all, well almost I problelly going to pick up the phon > e off of ebay so if not one t mobile currently carrys thats ok . I live > in a area were almost all cell companys have so so receiption (verizon > too) So I need a rf receiption champ to help me out. thanx Bob S. I've been using a Nokia 6010 for a few weeks now and the reception is pretty good. I got it for free (w/ activation) on a basic plan. I might look into the Mot 280 as a backup.
X-Eliminator - 06 Sep 2004 15:26 GMT Moto P280...I own 3 of therm & have used them in UK with great success.
========================================================
>Ok the topic says all, well almost I problelly going to pick up the phon >e off of ebay so if not one t mobile currently carrys thats ok . I live >in a area were almost all cell companys have so so receiption (verizon >too) So I need a rf receiption champ to help me out. thanx Bob S. John S. - 06 Sep 2004 15:40 GMT >Moto P280...I own 3 of therm & have used them in UK with great >success. GREAT reception - but otherwise a peice of sh.t for a phone.
I owned one and as soon as I got back from Africa, I posted it for sale on E-Bay and picked up a Nokia.
Motorola (not just the P280) has not gotten the message that things like switching bands should be automatic. Things like menu navigation should be intuitive and not have to be re-learned each time you want to do something that isn't done on a daily basis.
I doubt that they will ever get the message so I simply don't buy their product.
-- John S. e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
Mike S. - 06 Sep 2004 17:33 GMT >>Moto P280...I own 3 of therm & have used them in UK with great >>success. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Motorola (not just the P280) has not gotten the message that things like >switching bands should be automatic. They addressed that in the "P280 second edition" i.e. the 280i which, unfortunately, was never picked up by a US carrier.
Bob 1 - 06 Sep 2004 23:57 GMT yes the 6610 maybe a nice tri band phone I going to be using it 99% In califorina, neveda and very small time in az. So is it only nokia triband phones that get good receipt or are there other models to look at and remember Im open to non nokia suggestions too. thanx guys keep it going Bob S.
Charles Hawtrey - 07 Sep 2004 04:35 GMT sexyexotiche@aol.comspamfree (John S.) climbed onto an orange crate and shouted:
>>Moto P280...I own 3 of therm & have used them in UK with great >>success. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >intuitive and not have to be re-learned each time you want to do something that >isn't done on a daily basis. I'm a P280 fan and these are annoyances, for certain. To me it's worth putting up with them in return for outstanding reception and audio quality, but then I only travel overseas a few times a year so the menu hassles aren't such a big deal. To each his own.
While we're all ragging on the P280, note also that its text entry method for SMS is poor. Wish it had T9.
On the upside, spare batteries and accessories are cheap. It also has a monochrome screen that is more readable in bright light than a typical color screen, and uses largish fonts that are a boon for those of us "of a certain age" who have trouble with small type.
-- "Dude, we totally forgot our slogan..." ~ Medical Marijuana Association Billboard
Bob 1 - 11 Sep 2004 23:05 GMT Ok guy my bumpola, any more Ideas on this topic? thanx bob s.
Joseph - 12 Sep 2004 02:59 GMT >Ok guy my bumpola, any more Ideas on this topic? thanx bob s. Nokia 2190. Heck of a phone and it does double duty as you can use it for self defense.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bob 1 - 21 Sep 2004 07:02 GMT >>Ok guy my bumpola, any more Ideas on this topic? thanx bob s. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > lol funny man, ok any more useful suggestions of phone made in the last three years
Bob 1 - 25 Sep 2004 21:06 GMT >>> Ok guy my bumpola, any more Ideas on this topic? thanx bob s. >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > lol funny man, ok any more useful suggestions of phone made in the last > three years my bumpola again , hey are there any good single band phones known for good RF receiption, I could get a old 8290 or 8390 cheap on ebay , hey come on guys someone got to have a option out there.
Joseph - 25 Sep 2004 21:54 GMT >my bumpola again , hey are there any good single band phones known for >good RF receiption, I could get a old 8290 or 8390 cheap on ebay , hey >come on guys someone got to have a option out there. Stay far far away from the 8290. Many units had problems with screen fade. If you want a small phone get an 8390. If you want an old steady phone try a Nokia 5190 or Nokia 3390. They are no nonsense non fancy phones, but for the job of just making calls they work fine. The problem you'll find with the 3390 though is that even with "better" batteries the battery life is not very good. OTOH even though the 5190 is very plain jane it works well and has excellent battery life even with the standard NiMh battery. Lots of accessories readily available since the 51XX series was used all over the world and also used in many different technologies (TDMA/CDMA and GSM.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bob 1 - 26 Sep 2004 09:28 GMT >>my bumpola again , hey are there any good single band phones known for >>good RF receiption, I could get a old 8290 or 8390 cheap on ebay , hey [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > thanx joseph for the reply any more ideas guys , all constructive comments welcomed.
dave martin - 28 Sep 2004 07:06 GMT Bob 1 <ThatWouldBeTelling@DrakeIsSix.com> wrote in message
> thanx joseph for the reply any more ideas guys , all constructive > comments welcomed. I've found that in fringe areas the Motorola V60 is as sensitive as the P280.
Overall I prefer the V60's features and recommend it over the P280.
Both are really good for GPRS and maintain connectivity even when signals are so low that voice is impractical.
I've no idea of how their sensitivity might compare to a pcmcia card but I like being able to strategically place the phones in a high window to improve reception.
My biggest complaint about the motorola phones is the external connector for data; the multiple contacts are very insecure and are my main source of communication problems. The antenna connectors are also very insecure.
Dave
|
|
|