Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / T-Mobile / February 2005
New GSM phone
|
|
Thread rating:  |
gsmgsmgsm@bumerang.ro - 29 Jan 2005 06:00 GMT Hi,
My 1 year contract with T-Mobile is up and I feel like getting a new phone. When I called customer service they haven't offered my anything better than my Nokia 6610. It is kind of funny that Amazon is offering all those cool phones for free after mail-in rebates.
I'm thinking whether I should cancel my TM account and switch somewhere else (Cingular, ATT). I live in the Boston area. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Willa Jabir - 29 Jan 2005 16:36 GMT Port your number, get a new phone, and a new contract. Pay the activaction fee in most cases. Still cheaper than buying the new phone.
>Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Thanks John S. - 29 Jan 2005 22:33 GMT >>I'm thinking whether I should cancel my TM account and switch somewhere >>else (Cingular, ATT). >>I live in the Boston area. Any suggestions? Well, if you are happy with theservice that TM provides, stay with them.
On the other hand, Cingular is the original "A" band Cellular carrier (read that 800MHz) and they bought AT&T which I believe is 1900 PCS there in the Boston area. This combination should give you better coverage than T-Mobile alone.
My last trip up that way was to Cape Cod. I was in Dennis and had excellent coverage on my AT&T Wireless phone (both TDMA and GSM), my T-Mobile phone and my Sprint Phone. At that time I did not have a Cingular phone for comparison as I now have.
I live in Texas and work all over the world.
-- John S. e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
Joseph - 29 Jan 2005 16:42 GMT >My 1 year contract with T-Mobile is up and I feel like getting a new >phone. When I called customer service they haven't offered my anything >better than my Nokia 6610. It is kind of funny that Amazon is offering >all those cool phones for free after mail-in rebates. For *new* customers!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
John Richards - 29 Jan 2005 20:16 GMT >>My 1 year contract with T-Mobile is up and I feel like getting a new >>phone. When I called customer service they haven't offered my anything >>better than my Nokia 6610. It is kind of funny that Amazon is offering >>all those cool phones for free after mail-in rebates. > > For *new* customers! Switch to Sprint and you'll get a $150 rebate on a new phone every 18 months.
 Signature John Richards
Joseph - 30 Jan 2005 17:23 GMT >>>My 1 year contract with T-Mobile is up and I feel like getting a new >>>phone. When I called customer service they haven't offered my anything [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Switch to Sprint and you'll get a $150 rebate on a new phone >every 18 months. And who gives a rip? This is about *T-Mobile* not Sprint. You really should pay attention.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
John Richards - 31 Jan 2005 04:05 GMT >>>>My 1 year contract with T-Mobile is up and I feel like getting a new >>>>phone. When I called customer service they haven't offered my anything [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > And who gives a rip? This is about *T-Mobile* not Sprint. You really > should pay attention. Do you like going through life with blinders on? No one is married to T-Mobile, especially when the contract is up. Switching carriers is always an option if you don't like your current carrier's policies.
 Signature John Richards
Edmund Lattime - 29 Jan 2005 21:16 GMT I was thinking the same. Is there anything stopping someone from having another person (wife) in household opening a new acct and you/me cancelling the last one? You would then have 1 active acct (SIM) and two phones.
On 1/29/05 11:42 AM, in article f7fnv0tkvh18eegmk4eo5hk228om4odppv@4ax.com,
>> My 1 year contract with T-Mobile is up and I feel like getting a new >> phone. When I called customer service they haven't offered my anything [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Joe Phillips - 30 Jan 2005 04:48 GMT >>My 1 year contract with T-Mobile is up and I feel like getting a new >>phone. When I called customer service they haven't offered my anything [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > I love how *new* customers get everything at a really good discount. My sister, a first-time T-Mobile customer, just got herself a Nokia 6800 for supposedly $0. It was originally $100 with a $50 instant and a $50 mail-in rebate. Unfortunately I wasn't there to hear this for myself because from past experience these people who work in the company store are proan to fibbing. For example with my Motorola V66 I was told it would be FREE for an Upgrade, because I had been a good customer for such a long time, but after I said ok to the deal it was suddenly $50. When I questioned the sudden change in price I was told the exact opposite of what I was told not two minutes earlier. I wonder if they're taught to do it in such a way as to make you think you didn't hear something right and would be two embarrassed to claim you distinctly heard them say the exact opposite. At the time I wasn't about to argue because I was desperate for a replacement as I had just lost my phone and couldn't find it and I needed it for work.
So anyways getting back to why I'm writing this response, I went online to check out the Nokia 6800 at t-mobile.com and it lists the phone as $100 with a $100 web-rebate making it FREE. Is a web-rebate the same as instant-rebate? There was no mention of a mail-in rebate, unless this employee mixed up the phones with a similar one with a $50 instant+$50 mail-in like a few I saw on the site.
If it did have a mail-in rebate they forgot to give it to her because it wasn't in the bag with the other stuff or they were incorrect after all. My sisters big mistake was going by herself instead of waiting for me to get off work and go with her since I have had experience with the employees at that particular T-Mobile Store.
One last thing I'd like to note, and please correct me if I'm wrong is looking at the receipt it doesn't look like they charged her the customary $35 activation fee at all. All that's listed is:
1 NOK KIT 6800 VSW 49.99 1 ACC NOK 6800 UPGRADE PROGRAM 0.00 sale amount 49.99 sales tax 2.50 total 52.49
It looks more like a receipt for an existing customer than a new customer. Item 1 is the cell phone (at a discounted price) and 2 is the free accessory kit that came with it (carry case, car adapter, etc.)
Unfortunately the store was already closed by the time we went back by it after she picked me up from work so I didn't get to see the phone or the other stuff it came with until we got home.
After playing around with it I liked it enough to see what T-Mobile would give an existing customer for a deal. I called T-Mobile from my cell and asked about an upgrade deal. He said I could get it for $24.99, saving $10 over a *new* customer because their final cost was $35 since the phone had to be Activated. At the time it was confusing what he was trying to say because he kept babbling about the $35 Activation Fee but now that I wrote it down it makes sense because he didn't make it clear I wasnot paying for Activation.
Since they had originally sold the Nokia 6800 to my sister under the premise it was being discontinued I declined the offer over-the-phone and said I'd try to get it for a better deal elsewhere.
Hopefully I can do it withing a couple days because I had purchased the data cable for my Motorola V66 back on 1/9 and their return policy states 30 days. Do they give cash or store credit for opened accessories? Any chance they'd exchange the Motorola cable for a Nokia one if they have them at the same price? I picked up the one for $39.99 that was a Motorola Original and came with PhoneTools, not the $50 Susteen DataPilot one. I looked on the website for the one for Nokia 6800 and only saw a DataPilot boxed set at $58.00.
Yes, I know I could have gotten a generic off ebay for far less but at the time doing GPRS through the cell was new to me and I figured if I had trouble I'd have more of a success dealing with Customer Service if they saw I had an official one purchased directly from them. I saw it as a "if it don't do jack, they can't deny giving your money back since they sold it to you" position.
Thanks for reading this very lengthy post. Sorry if it went a little off the original topic of being about getting a new gsm phone as a new customer vs an existing.
JohnF - 30 Jan 2005 15:54 GMT Won't that put you right back into another contract?
> Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Thanks MS - 30 Jan 2005 21:15 GMT You can get any phone that T-Mobile offers for the same price they offer new customers, in exchange for renewing your contract. Look at what they have on the web, go into a T-Mobile store, etc., to see what interests you.
Amazon--no. Their deals are only for new customers, not for renewals.
I agree that T-Mobile does not have as good a phone selection as other carriers, such as Cingular. However, I don't think that's a good reason for switching carriers. Most important are coverage, reception, etc. And of course, price of monthly charges, and I think T-Mo wins on that front!
> Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Thanks Diane Selwyn - 31 Jan 2005 04:21 GMT > I agree that T-Mobile does not have as good a phone selection as other > carriers, such as Cingular. However, I don't think that's a good reason for > switching carriers. Most important are coverage, reception, etc. And of > course, price of monthly charges, and I think T-Mo wins on that front! Is coverage/reception versus Cingular even a reason for switching from T-Mobile? The way I understand it, a roaming agreement with Cingular allows T-Mobile phones to roam for free on the Cingular network (with a national rate plan). In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big as the T-Mobile coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? ..especially if you have a quad-band phone that takes advantage of the parts of Cingular's network that are on 850MHz.
I have enjoyed T-Mobile service since my contract expired a year or so ago. Since then, when I needed to upgrade a phone I've had the freedom to look for unlocked GSM phones on eBay and on other vendor web sites. It's harder to get the same rock-bottom prices that are offered with new service contracts, but I think the flexibility to shop around makes it worth it.
BruceR - 31 Jan 2005 05:30 GMT Not quite. While the overall coverage area is the combination of the two you have to still be concerned about local coverage at home. You'll only be roaming on Cingular if there is no TMo signal. For example, let's say that your house is in an area where the TMo signal is just one or two bars and hardly useable and there is a Cingular tower next door that would give you 5 bars and perfect service. Will your phone switch to the Cingular tower? Nope. As long as there is some form of TMo signal present you're stuck with it. This is not unique to TMo, it would work the same way if the names of the carriers were reversed. So, when deciding on which carrier is best, it's important that you test it at all those places where you usually use the phone; i.e., home, office, commute, gym, etc. When you travel it doesn't make a difference since you're just concerned with general coverage areas unless you regularly stay at the same place.
From:Diane Selwyn diane.selwynNOSPAM@backpacker.com
>> I agree that T-Mobile does not have as good a phone selection as >> other carriers, such as Cingular. However, I don't think that's a [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > offered with new service contracts, but I think the flexibility to > shop around makes it worth it. Joseph - 31 Jan 2005 18:08 GMT >Is coverage/reception versus Cingular even a reason for switching from >T-Mobile? The way I understand it, a roaming agreement with Cingular >allows T-Mobile phones to roam for free on the Cingular network (with a >national rate plan). No you do not understand how it works. You can only roam when a roaming agreement is in place. If a roaming agreement is in place you can use another network. If none exists you cannot.
>In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big >as the T-Mobile coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? No. Since T-Mobile does not have a roaming agreement anywhere cingular has coverage. Some places yes, but other places no.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Diane Selwyn - 31 Jan 2005 22:56 GMT >>In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big >>as the T-Mobile coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? > > No. Since T-Mobile does not have a roaming agreement anywhere > cingular has coverage. Some places yes, but other places no. I was told explicity by a T-Mo customer service rep that I would never be charged for digital roaming in the United States. For further clarification, she said that even if ANY other carrier showed up on my handset...Cingular, Western Wireless, whatever...I would never have to pay roaming charges.
The way I understand it, the only way I'd incur roaming charges is if I were abroad.
BruceR wrote:
> Not quite. While the overall coverage area is the combination of the > two you have to still be concerned about local coverage at home. You'll [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > to the Cingular tower? Nope. As long as there is some form of TMo signal > present you're stuck with it. Thanks for this feedback. I'm curious if I could take advantage of some of the manual network selection options on my phone if I encountered anything like this. I would assume it is hard-coded into all T-Mo branded phones to prioritize the T-Mo network, but with unlocked phones purchased from third party retailers I would think you can do some tinkering with manual network selection and profiles.
Andy M - Tampa Bay - 01 Feb 2005 01:43 GMT >>>In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big as the T-Mobile >>>coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > handset...Cingular, Western Wireless, whatever...I would never have to pay > roaming charges. And do you seriously believe the "spoken word" of the base-level customer service muppets? They've tried to tell me things such as: - In 2002, I was told I could roam on Verizon (didn't tell them I'm an EE and knew the difference between TDMA, GSM and CDMA). This guy was a hoot and he wouldn't shut up, talking about the great benefits of roaming nationwide on Verizon's network. FOr a while I thought I must have called the wrong number, but my display showed I'd dialled 611 and he was accessing my account info. - Summer 2004, while working in Cailfornia, in the cellular industry, I called up customer care to report dead spots. The guy is telling me my phone should switch to ATTWS. Meanwhile, I have a rack in my SUV and I can see that only VZW, T-Mo, and ATTWS TDMA have signals, no Nextel, Cingular GSM or TDMA, no Sprint. So I ask him how he knows that there should be ATTWS coverage in the area. His response is that he checked the map on their website. I ask him if it is GSM or TDMA, he says TDMA... and so I ask him how my handset should work on an ATTWS TDMA signal. He tells me to "power-cycle" my phone, as in to turn it off, wait 60 secs, turn it back on. Oh bugger... this guy should have been a White House spokesman.
I just feel sorry for those guys in customer care. It wouldn't surprise me if their jobs went to India where the muppet is intelligent and educated and knows what he/he is talking about, even if I can't understand the accent.
I know these couple of head-cases i've dealt with are rare, most muppets are excellent and friendly. But I always ask them to fax/email/mail me a copy that I'll sign and send back.
-Andy M - Tampa Bay
> The way I understand it, the only way I'd incur roaming charges is if I > were abroad. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > from third party retailers I would think you can do some tinkering with > manual network selection and profiles. Joseph - 01 Feb 2005 14:22 GMT >I was told explicity by a T-Mo customer service rep that I would never >be charged for digital roaming in the United States. For further >clarification, she said that even if ANY other carrier showed up on my >handset...Cingular, Western Wireless, whatever...I would never have to >pay roaming charges. That's exactly right.
>The way I understand it, the only way I'd incur roaming charges is if I >were abroad. Or outside the contiguous US and Hawai'i.
>Thanks for this feedback. I'm curious if I could take advantage of some >of the manual network selection options on my phone if I encountered >anything like this. I would assume it is hard-coded into all T-Mo >branded phones to prioritize the T-Mo network, but with unlocked phones >purchased from third party retailers I would think you can do some >tinkering with manual network selection and profiles. If you have your phone on automatic network selection another network will be selected if your home network is not available. The way it's set up is that it looks first for the home network. If the home network is not there it will seek out other networks it has permission to use. If it gets permission you connect to that other network. If there's no permission to use another network you will either get a blank screen on Nokias or on others you may get "emergency use only if there are other networks but you are refused permission to use them. If there's no service at all you may (depending on the phone model) get a no service message.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cyrus Afzali - 02 Feb 2005 21:38 GMT >>>In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big >>>as the T-Mobile coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >handset...Cingular, Western Wireless, whatever...I would never have to >pay roaming charges. I have absolutely no doubt you were told that, because I've been told that as well, but unfortunately for you and anyone else who hears it, it's wrong.
Unbelievably, many TM CSRs still tell customers they will be able to roam whereever there's GSM coverage in the U.S. But that totally glosses over the fact that most TM users don't have 850 mHz-capable phones, which are necessary to communicate on many of the areas that were overlays of GSM by the old AT&T Wireless and the old Cingular.
There have been reports here that some 850 roaming is possible with a TM SIM if you have a capable phone, but that's not an absolute.
>Thanks for this feedback. I'm curious if I could take advantage of some >of the manual network selection options on my phone if I encountered >anything like this. I would assume it is hard-coded into all T-Mo >branded phones to prioritize the T-Mo network, but with unlocked phones >purchased from third party retailers I would think you can do some >tinkering with manual network selection and profiles. You don't need an unlocked phone to select another carrier's network using a manual search. But unless there's a roaming agreement in place, you're not *supposed* to be able to authenticate on it. I know you may be able to in certain situations, but....
Jym L - 02 Feb 2005 23:06 GMT Read thru the oast postings.. Someone quoting T-Mobile said that some phones such as Nokia 6010 do have ability to roam on 850, but that TMobile does not have any specifc agreements or roaming arrangements...
Since TMobile does not have 850 Mhz service, I expect they dont have the license structure from FCC to "offically" offer and promote it...
And even regular 1900 Mhz is technically not guaranteed in pretty much any area... (read your Terms & Conditions)
> >>>In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big > >>>as the T-Mobile coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > place, you're not *supposed* to be able to authenticate on it. I know > you may be able to in certain situations, but.... Cyrus Afzali - 03 Feb 2005 16:20 GMT >Read thru the oast postings.. Someone quoting T-Mobile said that some >phones such as Nokia 6010 do have ability to roam on 850, but that TMobile >does not have any specifc agreements or roaming arrangements... > >Since TMobile does not have 850 Mhz service, I expect they dont have the >license structure from FCC to "offically" offer and promote it... The question is whether coverage through a roaming partner would qualify as "offering" the service? That would, of course, be up to the FCC to interpret and decide.
>And even regular 1900 Mhz is technically not guaranteed in pretty much any >area... (read your Terms & Conditions) Never said it was. Most anyone who's been with TM for a while knows very well they have the smallest footprint of any "national" carrier.
>> >>>In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big >> >>>as the T-Mobile coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] >> place, you're not *supposed* to be able to authenticate on it. I know >> you may be able to in certain situations, but.... steve - 03 Feb 2005 03:10 GMT > >>>In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big > >>>as the T-Mobile coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > phones, which are necessary to communicate on many of the areas that > were overlays of GSM by the old AT&T Wireless and the old Cingular. The assertion was that t-mobile subscribers would not ever be charged roaming in the USA, not that they could roam anywhere there is GSM coverage.
s
Cyrus Afzali - 03 Feb 2005 16:21 GMT >> >>>In effect, then, isn't the T-Mobile network as big >> >>>as the T-Mobile coverage map + the Cingular coverage map? [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >roaming in the USA, not that they could roam anywhere there is GSM >coverage. Again, it depends on who you've talked to. TM reps have told many people, myself included, that TM customers had the ability to roam ANYWHERE there was GSM coverage. I'm not talking about fees charged here, but rather the ability to roam. And that's just patently false.
I noticed the problem was especially rampant when Cingular was still completing its TDMA overlay. Most of that area is 850 which is useless in most cases.
Jym L - 03 Feb 2005 23:05 GMT > Again, it depends on who you've talked to. TM reps have told many > people, myself included, that TM customers had the ability to roam [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > completing its TDMA overlay. Most of that area is 850 which is useless > in most cases. This was posted in October in this very group:
> So is T-mobile going to start expanding to the 800(850) band? Things I have
> been reading state a lot of that band are open for use but it only seems > that dobson - cell one is using it and cingular. Per a friend at T-Mobile:
Though there are "pockets" of 850 band coverage in very small parts of our roaming partner's networks, T-Mobile does not currently advertise or promote this service to our customers. For customers that are currently aware of 850 pocket coverage in their area, please use the following to guide your responses to these potential questions:
Does T-Mobile offer service in the 850 band?
>No. However some of our 1900 band roaming partners do provide 850 band coverage in some areas.
What is Domestic 850 band roaming?
>T-Mobile's 'home' band of spectrum is 1900 MHz. Some customers, with specific phones, may have the ability to make calls on the 850 band in very small parts of our roaming partner's networks.
Will T-Mobile increase its coverage area in the 850 band?
>T-Mobile currently has no plans to enter into roaming agreements with 850 band carriers
How long will I be able to use my phone in this area?
>Though it is not guaranteed, we have no plans to deactivate 850 band pocket coverage.
>While a customer is in an 850 band pocket, they will see the name of the carrier they are roaming on, not "T-Mobile" on their handset display.
How come my friend can use his phone here and I can't?
>Not all handsets are 850 band capable. If the customer is interested in using their handset in an 850 band pocket coverage area, they will need to upgrade to an 850 band capable handset.
How much does it cost?
>Calls placed while a customer is in an 850 band pocket will be billed just as if they are whiel roaming with our partners.
Which handset work on 850 band?
>Currently only Nokia 3593, Nokia 6010 and Treo 850 are configured to support 850 on T-Mobile branded and programmed handsets.
Can I change or upgrade in my current handset to an 850 band handset?
>Yes. If a customer is interested in using their handset in an 850 band pocket coverage area, they will need to upgrade to an 850 band capable handset.
Why do my calls drop when I get into an 850 band coverage area?
>A customer's handset is always pulling signal from the tower that provides the best coverage for the area they are in (not necessarily the closest tower). When a customer is traveling, this signal is "handed-off" from tower to tower. When a customer moves between T-Mobile towers this "hand-off" happens without the customer knowing they are changing towers. When the customer moves from a T-Mobile tower to a roaming partner's tower (whether it is 1900 or 850 band), the hand off is not always smooth and, unfortunately the customer may experience a dropped call.
Will all of my features work?
>Unfortunately not all features will work in 850 band pocket coverage areas. Where are the 850 band pockets?
>Because we do not advertise or promote these "pocket" coverage areas, we do not provide maps of these areas. 850 band pocket coverage areas are not currently displayed in the Interactive Coverage Map (ICM).
Why is 850 allowed in certain areas but not others?
>Some T-Mobile roaming partners have networks in both the 850 and 1900 bands. Some of these carriers cannot restrict T-Mobile customers from using their 850 band coverage if the customer has an 850 band capable handset.
Cyrus Afzali - 05 Feb 2005 05:34 GMT >>Currently only Nokia 3593, Nokia 6010 and Treo 850 are configured to >support 850 on T-Mobile branded and programmed handsets. You mean the Treo 600, right? It's advertised on TM as being 850-capable.
Jym L - 05 Feb 2005 11:08 GMT Yes that was a PC boo boo should have read Treo 600 have ... 850 ...
> >>Currently only Nokia 3593, Nokia 6010 and Treo 850 are configured to > >support 850 on T-Mobile branded and programmed handsets. > > You mean the Treo 600, right? It's advertised on TM as being > 850-capable. Michael Brennan - 18 Feb 2005 05:10 GMT >Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Thanks I had heard they are offering returning customers - retention division - a Nokia 3660 for $35.00 (you must agree to sign up for 12months). I would be willing to take the 6610 off your hands for $35.00, costing you $0.00.
Amazon is a different story, they discount the commission they get from TMobile in form of a rebate. This only applies to new customers.
--mikeb
Jym L - 19 Feb 2005 01:29 GMT There is no "retention" department or group any more...
> >Hi, > > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > --mikeb
|
|
|