>As I recall, the 650 would offer TM users no benefit. The GSM version
>of the 650 is designed to support EDGE, which TM has not implemented.
>
>The big news with that model, at least to a lot of wireless customers,
>is it finally brings Treo functions to CDMA users.
>>As I recall, the 650 would offer TM users no benefit. The GSM version
>>of the 650 is designed to support EDGE, which TM has not implemented.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Huh? What, pray tell, was the Treo 300? And the Sprint variant of the Treo 600?
>Both were Treos, both were CDMA.
I'm talking about high-speed network capability. The Sprint variant of
the 600 came after the GSM versions, IIRC. It wasn't until the recent
iterations of the Treo that you had full-fledged functionality on
anything that would qualify as a high-speed network because for a long
time GPRS was as close as you got in the U.S.
Isaiah Beard - 28 Apr 2005 03:52 GMT
>>>As I recall, the 650 would offer TM users no benefit. The GSM version
>>>of the 650 is designed to support EDGE, which TM has not implemented.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I'm talking about high-speed network capability. The Sprint variant of
> the 600 came after the GSM versions, IIRC.
Yes, and it supported 1xRTT data, just like the CDMA version of the Treo
650. So, what's the difference?

Signature
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.