>Per ditinsta:
>>That's a great deal, but their prepaid coverage area is way too limited for
>>me.
>That's the second or third time I've read something in which I think somebody
>has alluded to different coverages for monthly and prepaid customers on tMobile.
In the Bad Old Days the prepaid t-mobile accounts were limited
to the area served by the underlying legacy network. That is,
t-mobile had purchsed/merged a bunch of different companies, so
the prepaid phones only worked in the area served by the
original (pre t-mobile) compnay but not the others..
Apparently (no first hand info on this) the situation now
is that a current prepaid phone/SIM will work anywhere
in the native (full) t-mobile network, but will not function
in the (fairly modest) partenred/roaming areas.

Signature
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
klugja@hotmail.com - 15 Mar 2006 06:25 GMT
> Apparently (no first hand info on this) the situation now
> is that a current prepaid phone/SIM will work anywhere
> in the native (full) t-mobile network, but will not function
> in the (fairly modest) partenred/roaming areas.
In the state of Minnesota, outside Minneapolis/St.Paul, most of the
state is roaming either on Wireless Alliance (RCC &
Aerial/Voicestream/T-Mobile joint venture), and Dobson Cellular One.
Also, I think Western Wireless. Most of Wisconsin has no T-Mobile
native coverage either. It is provided by Cingular, Einstein PCS
(Airadigm), and at least one more that I have noticed on I-90 west of
Madison (has three letters on the phone display).
If you compare the T-mobile prepaid maps to non-prepaid, there is a
huge difference in geographical coverage, particularly now that they
show the GSM 850 roaming that used to be omitted from the maps (though
has worked in some cases for at least two years).