hotmail.com@dgareth.spm declared for all the world to hear...
> hotmail.com@dgareth.spm declared for all the world to hear...
>> Anyway, what I don't understand is why it is possible to get such good pre
>> pay offers in comparison to contract offers with Orange.
>
> ARPU from pre-pay users is generally much higher than contract users (no
> £250 phone subsidies every 12 months), ergo they get looked after.
ARPU doesn't include upgrade costs, its just a simple measure of revenue
per user from incoming and outgoing calls and data charges. It would
still be much higher for contract users even if you did discount handset
upgrades(much cheaper than £250- no VAT and bulk buying benefits for a
start) and retention costs. Bare in mind many people dont upgrade every
year, and when they do they dont haggle and get the upgrade for free.
I think the real reason behind Oranges behavior here is that they are
trying to reduce pre-pay churn, which must have been a particular
problem for them.
hairydog@despammed.com - 30 Jan 2006 18:36 GMT
>ARPU doesn't include upgrade costs
ARPU is a bloody stupid measure that tells you very little.
It is the average revenue, not the profit.
A customer who is on a contract and pays £5 per month but makes the
full inclusive call allowance and often calls OCS will probably bring
in no profit at all. A customer who is on a £25 per month contract but
makes no outgoing calls, has loads of incoming calls and never calls
OCS will be very profitable.
The trouble is that the bean-counters and the managers can't fathom
out a complicated measure, so they plump for an easy one instead.

Signature
Iain
the out-of-date hairydog guide to mobile phones
http://www.hairydog.co.uk/cell1.html
Browse now while stocks last!