My phone (SE T630) has options for GPRS header compression. When I've
experimented with the settings, the data counters in the phone show the
same amount of transfer.
Am I actually compressing the IP header? Do the UK networks differ on
how header compression is provided? And am I charged per 'uncompressed'
byte, or only the bytes sent over the air interface?
Apart from a (potential?) cost-saving, presumably header compression
also give a small improvement in latency. And also increases slightly
the capacity of a GPRS cell. As IPv6 is introduced, and more real-time
(i.e. small payload) services are carried over GPRS, will header
compression necessary?
(I am aware than all operators are providing data compression
on-the-fly for web pages etc. in their proxy servers - that's not what
I'm referring to).
regards,
Andrew
Phil Chung - 18 Oct 2006 12:23 GMT
> My phone (SE T630) has options for GPRS header compression. When I've
> experimented with the settings, the data counters in the phone show the
> same amount of transfer.
I would have thought the data counter is only counting the payload of
the packet, not the IP headers
> Am I actually compressing the IP header? Do the UK networks differ on
> how header compression is provided? And am I charged per 'uncompressed'
> byte, or only the bytes sent over the air interface?
Maybe the networks just count the payload and not the headers too?