Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / UK Group / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

N80 discontinued.  Being recalled??  Contract options

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
simon.hawking@talk21.com - 18 Oct 2006 22:46 GMT
I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.

Nokia have released the v4 fix, yet Orange won't approve their version
- leaving all N80 users with buggy phones.

Nokia won't allow NSC's to flash with generic v4, as it voids my Orange
warranty - even though Orange say the warranty is with Nokia *rolls
eyes*

Now to add insult to injury, the N80 has been pulled by nearly every UK
network.

So, this screams of a major fault and there are loads of forums with
guru's posting that the N80 is, or will be recalled.

Just a few:
http://www.expansys.com/forumthread.asp?code=127499&thread=350
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/forum/showthread.php?t=51560
http://forum.simalert.com/showthread.php?t=33872&highlight=orange

So question is what are the options for N80 owners?  Can we demand the
network gives us another phone under our contract with them, or simply
put up with a handset which doesn't work, and the selling network admit
doesn't work (hence discontinuing it).  Nokia have the fix, so as far
as they are concerned they've done everything they have to, it's now
the networks prob for not allowing Nokia to distribute branded versions
to end users via NSC's or the Nokia Software updater.

Surely *something* in the Orange contract means I/we can terminate our
contracts, and end our association with a network that doesn't give two
hoots about supporting or looking after their customers (went down hill
since Vodaphone and France Telecom got their hands on Orange, and
ruined a perfectly good company in my view).

I've emailed Orange cust services, simply an auto response.  Called,
they simply want to send another faulty handset (haven't they grasped
the fact its FIRMWARE yet??????).  Nokia say it's Oranges problem to
sort as it's their variant, Orange say Nokia as they built the thing.

Surely we have some comeback?  Must be a legal obligation for a network
operator (three, O2, Vodaphone, T-Mobile, Orange etc) or Nokia to do
SOMETHING!!!!!
©® - 19 Oct 2006 00:21 GMT
I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of
Goods Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose?
I returned a SE M600i after 14 days (and quoted SoG Act) because I could
not see the screen in daylight and there was no way I could accept/end a
call without touching the screen (no hard buttons)...because I couldn't
see it....
Somehow they allowed the return! (Phew!)
Would the SoG Act  apply here? Surely the N80 should do what it is meant
to without crashing etc. and work decently within limits...? What do
others think?
Benedict Addis - 19 Oct 2006 00:30 GMT
> I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods
> Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> to without crashing etc. and work decently within limits...? What do
> others think?

Yep, goods must be fit for purpose at the point they were sold to you - and
thanks to new EU regulations, the onus is on the retailer to prove this for
the first six months, which means you don't need to supply evidence other
than a list of faults.

Benedict.
Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 02:37 GMT
>> I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods
>> Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>the first six months, which means you don't need to supply evidence other
>than a list of faults.

But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
Orange are offering a replacement.
Signature

Alex Heney, Global Villager
Can you repeat the part after "Listen very carefully"?
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

Fred Finisterre - 19 Oct 2006 08:39 GMT
> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
> Orange are offering a replacement.

I think you have the right to a refund if you want.

Fred.
M.I.5¾ - 19 Oct 2006 09:14 GMT
>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
>> Orange are offering a replacement.
>
> I think you have the right to a refund if you want.

Why?  The right of rejection has long passed.

Orange has offered a replacement, that is all they are obliged to do.
guv - 20 Oct 2006 17:59 GMT
>>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
>>> Orange are offering a replacement.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Orange has offered a replacement, that is all they are obliged to do.

Which is fine as long as that same fault isnt in the replacement, else
they have admitted liability and not solved the problem.
Sprite - 21 Oct 2006 13:27 GMT
>>>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
>>>> Orange are offering a replacement.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Which is fine as long as that same fault isnt in the replacement, else
> they have admitted liability and not solved the problem.

Perhaps from a legal standpoint the way forward would be to let them send
the faulty handset, and whilst it may draw things out a bit, complaining
about the fault with that one would offer more evidence to them that it is
indeed the phone.

My brother had a similar scenario with a Nokia and Orange, I think he had
three handsets in the end and *eventually* they caved and let him get a Sony
Ericsson.

Signature

Sue

Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 09:55 GMT
>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
>> Orange are offering a replacement.
>
>I think you have the right to a refund if you want.

You think wrong.
Signature

Alex Heney, Global Villager
Trust me, I'm a lawyer..
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

James Luff - 19 Oct 2006 10:56 GMT
>>> I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods
>>> Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
> Orange are offering a replacement.

But if they replace it for another N80 they would be supplying goods
that are known to be defective, or not fit for the purpose and that's
illegal.

Signature

regards, James Luff               Gamertag: Lufferov
remove 'nospam' to e-mail
"There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those that understand binary, and those that don't."

Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 11:24 GMT
>>>> I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods
>>>> Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>that are known to be defective, or not fit for the purpose and that's
>illegal.

In what way is that illegal?

Anyhow, you can insist on a repair, rather than a replacement. And it
is the responsibility of the *supplier*. They can say "it is Nokia's
fault" as much as they like, but it is up to *them* to deal with it,
including (if necessary) getting Nokia to give them the fix.
Signature

Alex Heney, Global Villager
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

James Luff - 19 Oct 2006 12:25 GMT
>>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
>>> Orange are offering a replacement.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> In what way is that illegal?

The sale of goods act states that items must "conform to contract" which
means they must be as described, fit for *all* the purposes for which
the goods are supplied and of satisfactory quality. If they supply goods
they know to have a problem they are in breach of the sale of goods act
and therefore breaking the law.

Signature

regards, James Luff               Gamertag: Lufferov
remove 'nospam' to e-mail
"There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those that understand binary, and those that don't."

Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 13:04 GMT
>>>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said
>>>> Orange are offering a replacement.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>they know to have a problem they are in breach of the sale of goods act
>and therefore breaking the law.

First, technically it is unlawful, rather than illegal. But that is a
technicality.

Second, SOGA does not actually say that. It gives the customer
remedies if the items do not conform to contract, but it doesn't
actually say it is unlawful to supply items which do not, even if
known that they do not.
Signature

Alex Heney, Global Villager
Never test for an error you don't know how to handle.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

Gavin - 19 Oct 2006 18:58 GMT
>I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of
>Goods Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>to without crashing etc. and work decently within limits...? What do
>others think?

The supply of the handset and the sale of a contract are two seperate
things, with two (usually) different suppliers

I guess they could take back the handset and refund what you paid
(even nothing) and you'd still be liable for the term of the contract.

Pretty unlikely as it's a good will thing but possible,
Phil - 20 Oct 2006 08:14 GMT
What do the networks hope to acheive by altering Nokia's software, other than
a lot of disatified customers as this thread has show?
Jon - 20 Oct 2006 10:16 GMT
pj@thecork.trig222.f9.co.uk declared for all the world to hear...
> What do the networks hope to acheive by altering Nokia's software, other than
> a lot of disatified customers as this thread has show?

In Oranges case a uniform UI across as many devices from different
manufacturers as possible. This apparently engenders loyalty to the
brand and a kind of "comfort zone" for the less tech-savvy users (I.e.
99% of users)
Signature

Regards
Jon

MA - 19 Oct 2006 00:26 GMT
> I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.
>
> Nokia have released the v4 fix, yet Orange won't approve their version
> - leaving all N80 users with buggy phones.

So what bugs are you actually seeing? Or are people just seeing a list of
bug fixes by Nokia and wanting to upgrade, even though it may not directly
affect them?

I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it.
ACDeag - 19 Oct 2006 08:06 GMT
MA formulated on Thursday :
>> I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it.

I have had no problems with my N80 either, not on Orange, but O2.
Simon Dean - 21 Oct 2006 18:34 GMT
> MA formulated on Thursday :
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> I have had no problems with my N80 either, not on Orange, but O2.

I've experienced a few spurious crashes, a 3 Megapixel camera that's no
better than the 2 Megapixel on my 6680, paint that scratches off from
the phone a bit too quickly, a slider that has become noticeably loose
very quickly, and a bluetooth stack that crashes the phone if you
connect to two devices at the same time, ie, say, GPS and a handsfree kit.

Cya
Simon
topcat11uk - 19 Oct 2006 13:07 GMT
> > I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it.

Yep, I can add my name to the list of happy Nokia N80 owners on Orange.
Apart from the occasional freeze up and reboot I have had no real
problems with the phone.
simon.hawking@talk21.com - 19 Oct 2006 22:29 GMT
> > I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it.

I'm seeing the same as everyone else - take your pick of topics from:
http://discussions.nokia.co.uk/discussions/search?submitted=true&type=message&q=
orange+bugs+n80&page_size=20&index=public#search_results


On the basis that it is clearly evident I have refused a replacement
which will only exibit the same issues - as it's the same firmware.

It's actually not just Orange users (Three or 3, O2 & Voda too).
Clearly proving beyond all doubt that the new software is needed.

Nokia's stance is that the networks won't allow the handset to be
flashed with generic, as you'll loose all network support/replacement.
Nokia are also cracking down on service centres doing this, and
removing their ability to support Nokia handsets if caught.  There has
been talk on Nokia Forum that this practice will also invalidate your
Nokia warranty - so not something many (including me) which to do.

The phone was purchased on upgrade from an Orange shop (so essentially
direct from Orange) and is less than 4 months old.  It was purchased 2
days after launch on Orange, and was withdrawn by Orange (and some
other networks) nearly a month ago.

Orange Cust services give the N80 little care now it's discontinued,
and emailing the Executive Office (which I have the email address for)
simply goes unanswered for anyone who's tried to raise this at senior
level.

Bottom line appears to be Orange don't give a flying f*** about the
thousands of customers they've sold the N80 to.  They're happy to move
around handsets, but that will never fix the problem.

So how can I/we get some results with our networks and get them to take
some degree of responsibilty for resolving the issue?

One user on Nokia forum has an email from exec office at orange clearly
stating they will not approved any updates to firmware after 3.617 as
they've discontinued it.  On that basis what section of law will apply?
I'm getting conflicting answers reagrdingb whether the SoGA applies.
simon.hawking@talk21.com - 19 Oct 2006 22:34 GMT
> > I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it.

I'm seeing the same as everyone else - take your pick of topics from:
http://discussions.nokia.co.uk/discussions/search?submitted=true&type=message&q=
orange+bugs+n80&page_size=20&index=public#search_results


On the basis that it is clearly evident I have refused a replacement
which will only exibit the same issues - as it's the same firmware.

It's actually not just Orange users (Three or 3, O2 & Voda too).
Clearly proving beyond all doubt that the new software is needed.

Nokia's stance is that the networks won't allow the handset to be
flashed with generic, as you'll loose all network support/replacement.
Nokia are also cracking down on service centres doing this, and
removing their ability to support Nokia handsets if caught.  There has
been talk on Nokia Forum that this practice will also invalidate your
Nokia warranty - so not something many (including me) which to do.

The phone was purchased on upgrade from an Orange shop (so essentially
direct from Orange) and is less than 4 months old.  It was purchased 2
days after launch on Orange, and was withdrawn by Orange (and some
other networks) nearly a month ago.

Orange Cust services give the N80 little care now it's discontinued,
and emailing the Executive Office (which I have the email address for)
simply goes unanswered for anyone who's tried to raise this at senior
level.

Bottom line appears to be Orange don't give a flying f*** about the
thousands of customers they've sold the N80 to.  They're happy to move
around handsets, but that will never fix the problem.

So how can I/we get some results with our networks and get them to take
some degree of responsibilty for resolving the issue?

One user on Nokia forum has an email from exec office at orange clearly
stating they will not approved any updates to firmware after 3.617 as
they've discontinued it.  On that basis what section of law will apply?
I'm getting conflicting answers reagrdingb whether the SoGA applies.
Jon - 19 Oct 2006 11:00 GMT
simon.hawking@talk21.com declared for all the world to hear...
> So question is what are the options for N80 owners?  Can we demand the
> network gives us another phone under our contract with them

Your contract is for the supply of airtime. The phone is explicitly
separate.

Find yourself another service centre who will flash it with generic.
There are plenty about. Or sell the phone on eBay while you still can.

> Surely *something* in the Orange contract means I/we can terminate our
> contracts

Have you USIM cards stopped working?  You don't have grounds to cancel
unfortunately. The terms can be found at www.orange.co.uk/terms

> Surely we have some comeback?  Must be a legal obligation for a network
> operator (three, O2, Vodaphone, T-Mobile, Orange etc) or Nokia to do
> SOMETHING!!!!!

You could ask Orange for a DMR (different model replacement), you can
ask for this once you've had 3 or faulty ones of the same model.
Signature

Regards
Jon

Sprite - 21 Oct 2006 13:30 GMT
> simon.hawking@talk21.com declared for all the world to hear...
>> So question is what are the options for N80 owners?  Can we demand the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> You could ask Orange for a DMR (different model replacement), you can
> ask for this once you've had 3 or faulty ones of the same model.

This is the avenue my brother pursued, also with a Nokia, a little while
ago.  Of course, judging by the people who *are* happy with the handset (it
can't be 100% that are faulty), there's a chance you might get one you can
use happily...

Signature

Sue

Jim! - 19 Oct 2006 17:38 GMT
>I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>operator (three, O2, Vodaphone, T-Mobile, Orange etc) or Nokia to do
>SOMETHING!!!!!

As Jon earlier said - your contract with Orange is for the supply of
network airtime.  Providing your SIM card works then that's the limit
of the protection under the SOGA - or that's what my local trading
standards are telling people who phone up about malfunctioning
handsets.

On the last couple of Nokia BB5 handsets I've had on Orange, I've paid
for the unlock code, and then had it flashed to original Nokia
firmware by someone I know & trust.

Cheers

Jim
ACDeag - 19 Oct 2006 18:38 GMT
Jim! wrote on 19/10/2006 :

>> I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> Jim

Surely not if you buy your phone from Orange's website. If you buy it
from a shop then your recourse would be with the shop as well surely.
Jon - 20 Oct 2006 10:14 GMT
CAUPZITLZLVU@spammotel.com declared for all the world to hear...
> Surely not if you buy your phone from Orange's website. If you buy it
> from a shop then your recourse would be with the shop as well surely.

Yes but the remedy offered would be the same.
Signature

Regards
Jon

Sprite - 21 Oct 2006 13:31 GMT
> CAUPZITLZLVU@spammotel.com declared for all the world to hear...
>> Surely not if you buy your phone from Orange's website. If you buy it
>> from a shop then your recourse would be with the shop as well surely.
>
> Yes but the remedy offered would be the same.

At least having bought it from the shop you can maybe exchange the handset
there - test it out to see if it's faulty and show them to be faulty if they
all are.

Well, there's a lot of ifs - IF they still carry them, IF they're all faulty
and easily shown in a store, etc :)

Signature

Sue

Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 19:15 GMT
<snip>

>As Jon earlier said - your contract with Orange is for the supply of
>network airtime.  Providing your SIM card works then that's the limit
>of the protection under the SOGA - or that's what my local trading
>standards are telling people who phone up about malfunctioning
>handsets.

In which case, either those people are misreporting what they have
told Trading Standards, or Trading Standards are giving very duff
advice.

The *retailer* is responsible under SOGA, not the manufacturer of the
handset, nor the network provider.

If you bought direct from Orange, then they *are* responsible for both
handset and network.

If you bought from a shop, then the shop are responsible for both.

You will sometimes find that the shop are acting as agents for the
network supplier, in which case the shop will usually only be
responsible for the handset, unless they are acting as agents for the
whole package,when Orange will be.
Signature

Alex Heney, Global Villager
RamDisk is *not* an installation procedure.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

James Luff - 19 Oct 2006 23:50 GMT
>> Surely we have some comeback?  Must be a legal obligation for a network
>> operator (three, O2, Vodaphone, T-Mobile, Orange etc) or Nokia to do
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> standards are telling people who phone up about malfunctioning
> handsets.

Simply not true, if you have paid any money for a phone and contract you
are paying for the phone. If they give the phone to you free then it may
be slightly more complicated. But the lump sum you pay up front is to
take away the phone, monthly charges are for airtime. The phone may be
heavily discounted by the network operator, but you still pay for it.
Therefore the sale of goods act must apply. I have a feeling that even
if it is given to you free they still have certain obligations, but I
could be wrong on that.

Signature

regards, James Luff               Gamertag: Lufferov
remove 'nospam' to e-mail
"There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those that understand binary, and those that don't."

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.