Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / UK Group / October 2006
N80 discontinued. Being recalled?? Contract options
|
|
Thread rating:  |
simon.hawking@talk21.com - 18 Oct 2006 22:46 GMT I, like many others have the N80 on Orange.
Nokia have released the v4 fix, yet Orange won't approve their version - leaving all N80 users with buggy phones.
Nokia won't allow NSC's to flash with generic v4, as it voids my Orange warranty - even though Orange say the warranty is with Nokia *rolls eyes*
Now to add insult to injury, the N80 has been pulled by nearly every UK network.
So, this screams of a major fault and there are loads of forums with guru's posting that the N80 is, or will be recalled.
Just a few: http://www.expansys.com/forumthread.asp?code=127499&thread=350 http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/forum/showthread.php?t=51560 http://forum.simalert.com/showthread.php?t=33872&highlight=orange
So question is what are the options for N80 owners? Can we demand the network gives us another phone under our contract with them, or simply put up with a handset which doesn't work, and the selling network admit doesn't work (hence discontinuing it). Nokia have the fix, so as far as they are concerned they've done everything they have to, it's now the networks prob for not allowing Nokia to distribute branded versions to end users via NSC's or the Nokia Software updater.
Surely *something* in the Orange contract means I/we can terminate our contracts, and end our association with a network that doesn't give two hoots about supporting or looking after their customers (went down hill since Vodaphone and France Telecom got their hands on Orange, and ruined a perfectly good company in my view).
I've emailed Orange cust services, simply an auto response. Called, they simply want to send another faulty handset (haven't they grasped the fact its FIRMWARE yet??????). Nokia say it's Oranges problem to sort as it's their variant, Orange say Nokia as they built the thing.
Surely we have some comeback? Must be a legal obligation for a network operator (three, O2, Vodaphone, T-Mobile, Orange etc) or Nokia to do SOMETHING!!!!!
©® - 19 Oct 2006 00:21 GMT I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose? I returned a SE M600i after 14 days (and quoted SoG Act) because I could not see the screen in daylight and there was no way I could accept/end a call without touching the screen (no hard buttons)...because I couldn't see it.... Somehow they allowed the return! (Phew!) Would the SoG Act apply here? Surely the N80 should do what it is meant to without crashing etc. and work decently within limits...? What do others think?
Benedict Addis - 19 Oct 2006 00:30 GMT > I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods > Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > to without crashing etc. and work decently within limits...? What do > others think? Yep, goods must be fit for purpose at the point they were sold to you - and thanks to new EU regulations, the onus is on the retailer to prove this for the first six months, which means you don't need to supply evidence other than a list of faults.
Benedict.
Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 02:37 GMT >> I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods >> Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose? [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >the first six months, which means you don't need to supply evidence other >than a list of faults. But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said Orange are offering a replacement.
 Signature Alex Heney, Global Villager Can you repeat the part after "Listen very carefully"? To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
Fred Finisterre - 19 Oct 2006 08:39 GMT > But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said > Orange are offering a replacement. I think you have the right to a refund if you want.
Fred.
M.I.5¾ - 19 Oct 2006 09:14 GMT >> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said >> Orange are offering a replacement. > > I think you have the right to a refund if you want. Why? The right of rejection has long passed.
Orange has offered a replacement, that is all they are obliged to do.
guv - 20 Oct 2006 17:59 GMT >>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said >>> Orange are offering a replacement. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Orange has offered a replacement, that is all they are obliged to do. Which is fine as long as that same fault isnt in the replacement, else they have admitted liability and not solved the problem.
Sprite - 21 Oct 2006 13:27 GMT >>>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said >>>> Orange are offering a replacement. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Which is fine as long as that same fault isnt in the replacement, else > they have admitted liability and not solved the problem. Perhaps from a legal standpoint the way forward would be to let them send the faulty handset, and whilst it may draw things out a bit, complaining about the fault with that one would offer more evidence to them that it is indeed the phone.
My brother had a similar scenario with a Nokia and Orange, I think he had three handsets in the end and *eventually* they caved and let him get a Sony Ericsson.
 Signature Sue
Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 09:55 GMT >> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said >> Orange are offering a replacement. > >I think you have the right to a refund if you want. You think wrong.
 Signature Alex Heney, Global Villager Trust me, I'm a lawyer.. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
James Luff - 19 Oct 2006 10:56 GMT >>> I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods >>> Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose? [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said > Orange are offering a replacement. But if they replace it for another N80 they would be supplying goods that are known to be defective, or not fit for the purpose and that's illegal.
 Signature regards, James Luff Gamertag: Lufferov remove 'nospam' to e-mail "There are 10 types of people in the world: Those that understand binary, and those that don't."
Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 11:24 GMT >>>> I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of Goods >>>> Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose? [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >that are known to be defective, or not fit for the purpose and that's >illegal. In what way is that illegal?
Anyhow, you can insist on a repair, rather than a replacement. And it is the responsibility of the *supplier*. They can say "it is Nokia's fault" as much as they like, but it is up to *them* to deal with it, including (if necessary) getting Nokia to give them the fix.
 Signature Alex Heney, Global Villager Everyone is entitled to my opinion. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
James Luff - 19 Oct 2006 12:25 GMT >>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said >>> Orange are offering a replacement. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > In what way is that illegal? The sale of goods act states that items must "conform to contract" which means they must be as described, fit for *all* the purposes for which the goods are supplied and of satisfactory quality. If they supply goods they know to have a problem they are in breach of the sale of goods act and therefore breaking the law.
 Signature regards, James Luff Gamertag: Lufferov remove 'nospam' to e-mail "There are 10 types of people in the world: Those that understand binary, and those that don't."
Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 13:04 GMT >>>> But all you are *entitled* to is repair or replacement, and he said >>>> Orange are offering a replacement. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >they know to have a problem they are in breach of the sale of goods act >and therefore breaking the law. First, technically it is unlawful, rather than illegal. But that is a technicality.
Second, SOGA does not actually say that. It gives the customer remedies if the items do not conform to contract, but it doesn't actually say it is unlawful to supply items which do not, even if known that they do not.
 Signature Alex Heney, Global Villager Never test for an error you don't know how to handle. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
Gavin - 19 Oct 2006 18:58 GMT >I'm not by any means a leagl-guru, but surely there is the Sales of >Goods Act whereby it must be fit for its purpose? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >to without crashing etc. and work decently within limits...? What do >others think? The supply of the handset and the sale of a contract are two seperate things, with two (usually) different suppliers
I guess they could take back the handset and refund what you paid (even nothing) and you'd still be liable for the term of the contract.
Pretty unlikely as it's a good will thing but possible,
Phil - 20 Oct 2006 08:14 GMT What do the networks hope to acheive by altering Nokia's software, other than a lot of disatified customers as this thread has show?
Jon - 20 Oct 2006 10:16 GMT pj@thecork.trig222.f9.co.uk declared for all the world to hear...
> What do the networks hope to acheive by altering Nokia's software, other than > a lot of disatified customers as this thread has show? In Oranges case a uniform UI across as many devices from different manufacturers as possible. This apparently engenders loyalty to the brand and a kind of "comfort zone" for the less tech-savvy users (I.e. 99% of users)
 Signature Regards Jon
MA - 19 Oct 2006 00:26 GMT > I, like many others have the N80 on Orange. > > Nokia have released the v4 fix, yet Orange won't approve their version > - leaving all N80 users with buggy phones. So what bugs are you actually seeing? Or are people just seeing a list of bug fixes by Nokia and wanting to upgrade, even though it may not directly affect them?
I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it.
ACDeag - 19 Oct 2006 08:06 GMT MA formulated on Thursday :
>> I, like many others have the N80 on Orange. >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it. I have had no problems with my N80 either, not on Orange, but O2.
Simon Dean - 21 Oct 2006 18:34 GMT > MA formulated on Thursday : > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > I have had no problems with my N80 either, not on Orange, but O2. I've experienced a few spurious crashes, a 3 Megapixel camera that's no better than the 2 Megapixel on my 6680, paint that scratches off from the phone a bit too quickly, a slider that has become noticeably loose very quickly, and a bluetooth stack that crashes the phone if you connect to two devices at the same time, ie, say, GPS and a handsfree kit.
Cya Simon
topcat11uk - 19 Oct 2006 13:07 GMT > > I, like many others have the N80 on Orange. > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it. Yep, I can add my name to the list of happy Nokia N80 owners on Orange. Apart from the occasional freeze up and reboot I have had no real problems with the phone.
simon.hawking@talk21.com - 19 Oct 2006 22:29 GMT > > I, like many others have the N80 on Orange. > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it. I'm seeing the same as everyone else - take your pick of topics from: http://discussions.nokia.co.uk/discussions/search?submitted=true&type=message&q= orange+bugs+n80&page_size=20&index=public#search_results
On the basis that it is clearly evident I have refused a replacement which will only exibit the same issues - as it's the same firmware.
It's actually not just Orange users (Three or 3, O2 & Voda too). Clearly proving beyond all doubt that the new software is needed.
Nokia's stance is that the networks won't allow the handset to be flashed with generic, as you'll loose all network support/replacement. Nokia are also cracking down on service centres doing this, and removing their ability to support Nokia handsets if caught. There has been talk on Nokia Forum that this practice will also invalidate your Nokia warranty - so not something many (including me) which to do.
The phone was purchased on upgrade from an Orange shop (so essentially direct from Orange) and is less than 4 months old. It was purchased 2 days after launch on Orange, and was withdrawn by Orange (and some other networks) nearly a month ago.
Orange Cust services give the N80 little care now it's discontinued, and emailing the Executive Office (which I have the email address for) simply goes unanswered for anyone who's tried to raise this at senior level.
Bottom line appears to be Orange don't give a flying f*** about the thousands of customers they've sold the N80 to. They're happy to move around handsets, but that will never fix the problem.
So how can I/we get some results with our networks and get them to take some degree of responsibilty for resolving the issue?
One user on Nokia forum has an email from exec office at orange clearly stating they will not approved any updates to firmware after 3.617 as they've discontinued it. On that basis what section of law will apply? I'm getting conflicting answers reagrdingb whether the SoGA applies.
simon.hawking@talk21.com - 19 Oct 2006 22:34 GMT > > I, like many others have the N80 on Orange. > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I can't say I've had any problems with my N80 on Orange, I'm happy with it. I'm seeing the same as everyone else - take your pick of topics from: http://discussions.nokia.co.uk/discussions/search?submitted=true&type=message&q= orange+bugs+n80&page_size=20&index=public#search_results
On the basis that it is clearly evident I have refused a replacement which will only exibit the same issues - as it's the same firmware.
It's actually not just Orange users (Three or 3, O2 & Voda too). Clearly proving beyond all doubt that the new software is needed.
Nokia's stance is that the networks won't allow the handset to be flashed with generic, as you'll loose all network support/replacement. Nokia are also cracking down on service centres doing this, and removing their ability to support Nokia handsets if caught. There has been talk on Nokia Forum that this practice will also invalidate your Nokia warranty - so not something many (including me) which to do.
The phone was purchased on upgrade from an Orange shop (so essentially direct from Orange) and is less than 4 months old. It was purchased 2 days after launch on Orange, and was withdrawn by Orange (and some other networks) nearly a month ago.
Orange Cust services give the N80 little care now it's discontinued, and emailing the Executive Office (which I have the email address for) simply goes unanswered for anyone who's tried to raise this at senior level.
Bottom line appears to be Orange don't give a flying f*** about the thousands of customers they've sold the N80 to. They're happy to move around handsets, but that will never fix the problem.
So how can I/we get some results with our networks and get them to take some degree of responsibilty for resolving the issue?
One user on Nokia forum has an email from exec office at orange clearly stating they will not approved any updates to firmware after 3.617 as they've discontinued it. On that basis what section of law will apply? I'm getting conflicting answers reagrdingb whether the SoGA applies.
Jon - 19 Oct 2006 11:00 GMT simon.hawking@talk21.com declared for all the world to hear...
> So question is what are the options for N80 owners? Can we demand the > network gives us another phone under our contract with them Your contract is for the supply of airtime. The phone is explicitly separate.
Find yourself another service centre who will flash it with generic. There are plenty about. Or sell the phone on eBay while you still can.
> Surely *something* in the Orange contract means I/we can terminate our > contracts Have you USIM cards stopped working? You don't have grounds to cancel unfortunately. The terms can be found at www.orange.co.uk/terms
> Surely we have some comeback? Must be a legal obligation for a network > operator (three, O2, Vodaphone, T-Mobile, Orange etc) or Nokia to do > SOMETHING!!!!! You could ask Orange for a DMR (different model replacement), you can ask for this once you've had 3 or faulty ones of the same model.
 Signature Regards Jon
Sprite - 21 Oct 2006 13:30 GMT > simon.hawking@talk21.com declared for all the world to hear... >> So question is what are the options for N80 owners? Can we demand the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > You could ask Orange for a DMR (different model replacement), you can > ask for this once you've had 3 or faulty ones of the same model. This is the avenue my brother pursued, also with a Nokia, a little while ago. Of course, judging by the people who *are* happy with the handset (it can't be 100% that are faulty), there's a chance you might get one you can use happily...
 Signature Sue
Jim! - 19 Oct 2006 17:38 GMT >I, like many others have the N80 on Orange. > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] >operator (three, O2, Vodaphone, T-Mobile, Orange etc) or Nokia to do >SOMETHING!!!!! As Jon earlier said - your contract with Orange is for the supply of network airtime. Providing your SIM card works then that's the limit of the protection under the SOGA - or that's what my local trading standards are telling people who phone up about malfunctioning handsets.
On the last couple of Nokia BB5 handsets I've had on Orange, I've paid for the unlock code, and then had it flashed to original Nokia firmware by someone I know & trust.
Cheers
Jim
ACDeag - 19 Oct 2006 18:38 GMT Jim! wrote on 19/10/2006 :
>> I, like many others have the N80 on Orange. >> [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > Jim Surely not if you buy your phone from Orange's website. If you buy it from a shop then your recourse would be with the shop as well surely.
Jon - 20 Oct 2006 10:14 GMT CAUPZITLZLVU@spammotel.com declared for all the world to hear...
> Surely not if you buy your phone from Orange's website. If you buy it > from a shop then your recourse would be with the shop as well surely. Yes but the remedy offered would be the same.
 Signature Regards Jon
Sprite - 21 Oct 2006 13:31 GMT > CAUPZITLZLVU@spammotel.com declared for all the world to hear... >> Surely not if you buy your phone from Orange's website. If you buy it >> from a shop then your recourse would be with the shop as well surely. > > Yes but the remedy offered would be the same. At least having bought it from the shop you can maybe exchange the handset there - test it out to see if it's faulty and show them to be faulty if they all are.
Well, there's a lot of ifs - IF they still carry them, IF they're all faulty and easily shown in a store, etc :)
 Signature Sue
Alex Heney - 19 Oct 2006 19:15 GMT <snip>
>As Jon earlier said - your contract with Orange is for the supply of >network airtime. Providing your SIM card works then that's the limit >of the protection under the SOGA - or that's what my local trading >standards are telling people who phone up about malfunctioning >handsets. In which case, either those people are misreporting what they have told Trading Standards, or Trading Standards are giving very duff advice.
The *retailer* is responsible under SOGA, not the manufacturer of the handset, nor the network provider.
If you bought direct from Orange, then they *are* responsible for both handset and network.
If you bought from a shop, then the shop are responsible for both.
You will sometimes find that the shop are acting as agents for the network supplier, in which case the shop will usually only be responsible for the handset, unless they are acting as agents for the whole package,when Orange will be.
 Signature Alex Heney, Global Villager RamDisk is *not* an installation procedure. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
James Luff - 19 Oct 2006 23:50 GMT >> Surely we have some comeback? Must be a legal obligation for a network >> operator (three, O2, Vodaphone, T-Mobile, Orange etc) or Nokia to do [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > standards are telling people who phone up about malfunctioning > handsets. Simply not true, if you have paid any money for a phone and contract you are paying for the phone. If they give the phone to you free then it may be slightly more complicated. But the lump sum you pay up front is to take away the phone, monthly charges are for airtime. The phone may be heavily discounted by the network operator, but you still pay for it. Therefore the sale of goods act must apply. I have a feeling that even if it is given to you free they still have certain obligations, but I could be wrong on that.
 Signature regards, James Luff Gamertag: Lufferov remove 'nospam' to e-mail "There are 10 types of people in the world: Those that understand binary, and those that don't."
|
|
|