> My understanding is that these won't work, unless they run over HTTP. In
> which case you'll have to pay for data.

Signature
Antz
Part of the UKtm family
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>> My understanding is that these won't work, unless they run over HTTP. In
>> which case you'll have to pay for data.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Is it absolutely free? That's a bonus!
It's a double edged sword. The only traffic that is charged per byte is
HTTP. However the only traffic that is allowed at all depends on Three.
So, my own generic MSN client doesn't work. And since I'm not using a Three
phone, I can't download theirs. The result? I can't use free MSN, even
though they offer it.
Shak
Geoff - 17 Nov 2006 18:16 GMT
When I tried messaging my son on his 3 phone using MSN they asked for money
to message mobiles. So it may be free if you are on your 3 phone but not for
the person you are messaging if they are on their PC.
>>> My understanding is that these won't work, unless they run over HTTP. In
>>> which case you'll have to pay for data.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Shak
>-©LuVubG©-< - 18 Nov 2006 16:18 GMT
> When I tried messaging my son on his 3 phone using MSN they asked for
> money to message mobiles. So it may be free if you are on your 3 phone but
> not for the person you are messaging if they are on their PC.
It sounds as though you tried to send a message to a 'mobile device' using
Windows Live Messenger on your PC. If this is the scenario I am thinking of,
it would have been delivered as an SMS which is indeed chargeable. Was your
son definately 'online' when you tried to send it? If he has registered his
phone, he will never be shown as 'offline' as you can send him an SMS.

Signature
Antz
Part of the UKtm family
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>-©LuVubG©-< - 18 Nov 2006 16:14 GMT
>>> My understanding is that these won't work, unless they run over HTTP. In
>>> which case you'll have to pay for data.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Shak
That's a bit harsh of them - though I suppose I understand that, as you have
chosen to use a non-3 phone.

Signature
Antz
Part of the UKtm family
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Shak - 20 Nov 2006 10:34 GMT
>> It's a double edged sword. The only traffic that is charged per byte is
>> HTTP. However the only traffic that is allowed at all depends on Three.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> That's a bit harsh of them - though I suppose I understand that, as you
> have chosen to use a non-3 phone.
Yeh - I'm not complaining since I have my Three phone still and it's clear
in the terms and conditions that I'm not really allowed to use a non-Three
phone. I just think it's barmy of them, since I can't buy anything
(music/games) either.
This will become more important when they release their x-series stuff too.
Shak