>Remember that, legally, you must inform the party they're being recorded
>after the call commences to ensure the stuff is valid in a court of law.
Are you sure about that? A legal reference (statute or case law)
would help if you are. There's a lot of misunderstanding about the
legality of telephone recordings.
Even if true, there's nothing to stop one party to a telephone
conversation recording a call without the knowledge of the other
party, making an accurate transcript from the recording and
introducing the transcript in evidence. The opposing lawyers won't
allow their client to dispute accuracy of a transcript if they're
given a copy of the recording.
Mike.

Signature
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
the dog from that film you saw - 14 Dec 2006 20:33 GMT
>>Remember that, legally, you must inform the party they're being recorded
>>after the call commences to ensure the stuff is valid in a court of law.
>
> Are you sure about that? A legal reference (statute or case law)
> would help if you are. There's a lot of misunderstanding about the
> legality of telephone recordings.
i thought the law said at least 1 party had to know - i.e you.

Signature
Gareth.
A french man who wanted a castle threw his cat into a pond.
http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/dsbmusic/