 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / UK Group / February 2007skype on three
Would anybody recommend skype on three and the Nokia phone that goes with it .......? It's OK .......I just read about it..sounds like a bad deal...I'll stick to my Belkin Wi Fi phone ..... > It's OK .......I just read about it..sounds like a bad deal...I'll stick > to my Belkin Wi Fi phone ..... People want economy and they will pay any price to get it. Lee Iacocca Jim GM4DHJ presented the following explanation : > Would anybody recommend skype on three and the Nokia phone that goes with it > .......? Can't say I have used it much but when I have it works fine. It does not actually use the data path to carry conversation. When you click on the person's name it makes a normal phone call to the Skype servers, you still get the call free, this means it works on 2G as well as 3G. > Can't say I have used it much but when I have it works fine. It does > not actually use the data path to carry conversation. When you click on > the person's name it makes a normal phone call to the Skype servers, you > still get the call free, this means it works on 2G as well as 3G. pants....but thanks anyway..... its far from "pants" the quality is exceptional. >> Can't say I have used it much but when I have it works fine. It does >> not actually use the data path to carry conversation. When you click on the person's name it makes a normal phone >> call to the Skype servers, you still get the call free, this means it works on 2G as well as 3G. > > pants....but thanks anyway..... >Would anybody recommend skype on three and the Nokia phone that goes with it Is this the twerp who reckons that 1800MHz is useless because it is much higher frequency than 900MHz? If so, why on earth would you think of using 2100MHz instead? If not, be aware that you're being confused with the aforementioned twerp.  SignatureIain the out-of-date hairydog guide to mobile phones http://www.hairydog.co.uk/cell1.html Browse now while stocks last! > Is this the twerp who reckons that 1800MHz is useless because it is > much higher frequency than 900MHz? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > If not, be aware that you're being confused with the aforementioned > twerp. That is me..... 2100Mhz well, it will be just as bad as 1800Mhz then....... signed Twerp |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.