 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Country Specific / UK Group / July 2007wi fi unsafe
Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco Earthlink Wi-Fi Network Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, has recently compiled an excellent paper which illustrates the harm to health that is caused by electro magnetic radiation. It includes references to several important research papers which clearly show the dangers we all face from EMR exposure. She has kindly given permission to distribute the paper. http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/snafu_havas_wifi.pdf > Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco > Earthlink Wi-Fi Network [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/snafu_havas_wifi.pdf Calm down you seem to be letting this subject take over your life. How many posts ! Adam >Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco Earthlink Wi-Fi Network >Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, has recently compiled an excellent paper which illustrates the harm to health that is caused by electro magnetic radiation. It includes references to several important research papers which clearly show the dangers we all face from EMR exposure. She has kindly given permission to distribute the paper. > >http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/snafu_havas_wifi.pdf Have you considered that you're just a sick person? Shallow end of the gene pool, underdeveloped immune system?  Signature-- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: nickmooney@spamcop.net -- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11 -- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road >>Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco >>Earthlink Wi-Fi Network Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Have you considered that you're just a sick person? Shallow end of the > gene pool, underdeveloped immune system? Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, the trick is to bang the rocks together. Proceed from there. >>>Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco >>>Earthlink Wi-Fi Network Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University, [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, the trick is to bang >the rocks together. Proceed from there. I could reply with something cutting, but I don't like upsetting ill people like yourself. Signature-- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: nickmooney@spamcop.net -- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11 -- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road >>>>Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco >>>>Earthlink Wi-Fi Network Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > I could reply with something cutting, but I don't like upsetting ill > people like yourself. You're nuts. [snip] > > > Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, > > > the trick is to bang the rocks together. Proceed from [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > You're nuts. Pot, kettle, black............................ Ivor > Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, the trick is to bang > the rocks together. Proceed from there. You're an IDIOT. Graham >> Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, the trick is to bang >> the rocks together. Proceed from there. > > You're an IDIOT. > > Graham Graham, go back and watch the telly. You're no good at usenet. >>> Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, the trick is to bang >>> the rocks together. Proceed from there. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Graham, go back and watch the telly. You're no good at usenet. You're funny - you should be in movies. SignatureMark McIntyre >>>> Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, the trick is to bang >>>> the rocks together. Proceed from there. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >You're funny - you should be in movies. He'd wilt under the immence power of the lighting, and they might have 2-way analogue radios there menting his brain or upsetting his electricity allergy. Signature-- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: nickmooney@spamcop.net -- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11 -- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road >>> Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, the trick is to bang >>> the rocks together. Proceed from there. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Graham, go back and watch the telly. You're no good at usenet. You are suggesting watching TV with all those stray fields they create.. you are nuts wanting someone to be exposed to stuff like that. You should be suggesting they live in a remote area with no power and low man made EM fields so that they are only exposed to the natural microwave radiation from space (about 2.4G like WiFi and microwave ovens BTW). I wonder if these sensitives can detect when the universe is switched on and off? >>>> Listen up sperm-cop or whatever you think you are, the trick is to >>>> bang the rocks together. Proceed from there. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > You should be suggesting they live in a remote area with no power and low > man made EM fields Please stop putting words in my mouth. I will suggest no such things. > so that they are only exposed to the natural microwave > radiation from space (about 2.4G like WiFi and microwave ovens BTW) You do not know what you are talking about. Cosmic emr is broadband. > I > wonder if these sensitives can detect when the universe is switched on and > off? You write a lot of foolish things. >> so that they are only exposed to the natural microwave >> radiation from space (about 2.4G like WiFi and microwave ovens BTW) > > You do not know what you are talking about. Cosmic emr is broadband. You appear to know nothing. There is a nice hydrogen line just about 2.4G. Lots of emr from cosmic hydrogen. That is why there is a window reserved for cosmic observations. Now if 2.4G is so bad how did we survive for the last few million years? Why did God create 2.4G cosmic radiation if it is bad for us? >> I >> wonder if these sensitives can detect when the universe is switched on >> and >> off? > > You write a lot of foolish things. You just cut and paste a lot of other peoples foolish things. I assume you are not intelligent enough to know they are foolish and I advise you to take advice from others in this group who know better than you. > Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed > San Francisco Earthlink Wi-Fi Network [snip] Oh God, Lenny's back... Yawn.............................. Ivor >Oh God, Lenny's back... > >Yawn.............................. > >Ivor I *think* it must be one of those treatment programs that assesses people in the community every now and then, grit your teeth and he'll be assessed as unfit for release soon. Either that or he's stopped taking the pills again because he was lonely without the voices in his head. Either way, be nice to him, society should be tolerant of people who have been let down by our scandalous mental health services provision. SignatureClint Sharp > Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco Earthlink Wi-Fi Network > Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, has recently compiled an excellent paper which illustrates the harm to health that is caused by electro magnetic radiation. It includes references to several important research papers which clearly show the dangers we all face from EMR exposure. She has kindly given permission to distribute the paper. > > http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/snafu_havas_wifi.pdf Whatever happened to those claims that using VDUs caused miscarriages? It's a good job we didn't ban VDUs, eh? But we were lucky. Very lucky. We could have had miscarriages everywhere and no children instead. This would have been bad. Better to ban any new technology until it's been proved to the satisfaction of quacks and kooks around the world that it's safe. Low power wifi is clearer a far greater threat than TV transmissions because it's of lower power and therefore more subtle and dangerous. I say we ban it first, just to be safe. > Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco > Earthlink Wi-Fi Network [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/snafu_havas_wifi.pdf never seen a learned paper called "snafu" > Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco > Earthlink Wi-Fi Network Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University, Peterborough, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/snafu_havas_wifi.pdf I do like the reference, on page 7, to a power density of "0.11 +/-0.19 microW/cm2" (the 2 is, correctly, a superscript in the document). On the low limit, how do you get a negative power density? Dave >> Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San >> Francisco Earthlink Wi-Fi Network Dr. Magda Havas of Trent [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > in the document). On the low limit, how do you get a negative > power density? It's a quantum effect, innit Captain SignatureHog |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.