> Nobody ever seems to recommend Vodafone on this group
That's because they are so expensive.
> - but for
> off-peak
off-peak is off-peak becasue that's when most people don't want to use
it ;-)
Though that's not always true, of course.
IME Vodafone is the network most likely to give NETWORK BUSY errors in
the daytime. No idea why.
> and roaming PAYG they are hard to beat
Roaming PAYG may matter to some people, but for the vast majority, it
doesn't.
> (although they are
> putting their min charge up to 15p - so if you make lots of short
> calls they aren't so good).
Most mobile calls are very short.
> My wife's a low user but probably 80% of her spend is while abroad
> (since there's no landline to gas on!), and nothing that I'm aware of
> can touch Vodafone Passport. Eg 10 min call from Australia £1.75 - try
> looking into what the others charge!
Er, if you factor in the cost of getting to Australia the cost is very
different.
Andy Pandy - 24 May 2008 13:59 GMT
> > Nobody ever seems to recommend Vodafone on this group
>
> That's because they are so expensive.
Only peak. If you're a mainly peak user, don't use them.
> > - but for
> > off-peak
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Though that's not always true, of course.
Yup - off-peak is when businesses don't want to use it.
A social user who is at work all day, or whose contacts are, is more
likely to use their phone mainly at evenings and weekends - ie
off-peak.
> IME Vodafone is the network most likely to give NETWORK BUSY errors in
> the daytime. No idea why.
Not had that for about 4 years. Except on new year's eve.
> > and roaming PAYG they are hard to beat
>
> Roaming PAYG may matter to some people, but for the vast majority, it
> doesn't.
The vast majority don't go on holiday abroad? With the rip-off charges
for roaming (even after the EU rules) anyone who goes abroad on
holiday regularly could end up finding a large proportion of their
annual spend is on roaming calls, even though it's a small proportion
of their call time.
> > (although they are
> > putting their min charge up to 15p - so if you make lots of short
> > calls they aren't so good).
>
> Most mobile calls are very short.
Again - you need to look at it in terms of cost.
If you make 10 shorts a month and one long call, then the cost of the
long call could be more significant than the 10 short calls.
Eg 10 1 min calls and one 20 min call. Off-peak would be £1.80 total
on Vodafone even with their new 15p min charge.
What would it be on the other tariffs?
> > My wife's a low user but probably 80% of her spend is while abroad
> > (since there's no landline to gas on!), and nothing that I'm aware of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Er, if you factor in the cost of getting to Australia the cost is very
> different.
That's exactly how the mobile companies want you to look at it. The
holiday is costing you loads, so it doesn't matter if we rip you off
while you're there. Same with banks and forex places ripping you off
with exchange rate markups.
I'm still waiting for someone to tell me how much the other tariffs
recommended in this thread would charge for a 10 min call from
Australia, compared to the "so expensive" Vodafone.
--
Andy
allatsea - 24 May 2008 18:32 GMT
>> Nobody ever seems to recommend Vodafone on this group
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Er, if you factor in the cost of getting to Australia the cost is very
> different.
Or 10 minutes from Australia for 30p if on Three. I Travel a lot (sadly) for
my work (marine insurance surveyor) and Three is the best value for roaming
on the whole. I'd argue that Vodafone are the most expensive of the UK based
networks IME. This so much so that my employers are booting Voda into touch
wrt its 'travelling' employees.
brgds
Richard
Andy Pandy - 27 May 2008 23:11 GMT
> >> My wife's a low user but probably 80% of her spend is while abroad
> >> (since there's no landline to gas on!), and nothing that I'm aware of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >
> Or 10 minutes from Australia for 30p if on Three.
On PAYG?? We are specifically discussing PAYG tariffs.
> I Travel a lot (sadly) for
> my work (marine insurance surveyor) and Three is the best value for roaming
> on the whole. I'd argue that Vodafone are the most expensive of the UK based
> networks IME. This so much so that my employers are booting Voda into touch
> wrt its 'travelling' employees.
My company contract Vodafone tariff is crap for roaming - it's cheaper
using my wife's PAYG!
--
Andy
Steve Terry - 29 May 2008 17:37 GMT
<snip>
> Or 10 minutes from Australia for 30p if on Three. I Travel a lot (sadly)
> for my work (marine insurance surveyor) and Three is the best value for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> brgds
> Richard
Yes it's a shame he's limited himself to a Nokia 6021.
I would go for 3 PAYG Flat 12p per min, and as you say good
roaming rates especially on one of 3s own networks.
and with Orange 2g roaming in the UK, the voice network coverage beats
anything T Mobile or O2 can offer
Steve Terry
Nigel - 29 May 2008 17:54 GMT
> > Richard
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Steve Terry
The reason for sticking to a Nokia 6021 is that I already have a car kit for
this model fitted.
I guess I could change the car kit, but I feel that the costs involved (new
car kit/adapter + new phone) may be more than the potential call cost
savings of 3 PAYG.
Steve Terry - 29 May 2008 18:23 GMT
>> > Richard
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> car kit/adapter + new phone) may be more than the potential call cost
> savings of 3 PAYG.
The last car kit i went for was a Stingray Bluetooth one,
works on any Bluetooth phone.
Then it's future proof.
Steve Terry
Nigel - 29 May 2008 18:40 GMT
> >> > Richard
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Steve Terry
Steve: I understand the logic, but I have a 'hard wired' car kit already
installed in my car (I've never used Bluetooth).
If I moved over to 3 PAYG I'd have to buy a new phone and either a new
fitting kit or a Bluetooth adapter. I think that these additional costs
wouldn't make it worthwhile choosing three over T Mobile or Tesco.
Nigel.
JT - 25 May 2008 12:03 GMT
> Most mobile calls are very short.
Do any networks charge less than the full minute rate for short calls?