On 22 May, 23:06, "Steve Terry" <gFOUR...@tesco.net> wrote:
> <toby.hob...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6c84f7a0-d6ae-48f7-a71d-63998352b0b2@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...>Hi
<snip>
>> I like i suspect every Orange enthusiast, have been hoping for a
>> Hans Snook Mk2 to get the controls before Orange hits the ground.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Simon
>Business Telecoms
That's another thing, Snook didn't differentiate personal uses as second
class
as FT Orange does.
and Now I see Orange is insulting our intelligence with the daft "animal"
totem
tariffs on PAYG!
Umm... let me see, on easy to understand 3 PAYG Stretch 15 (quid)
i get 300 mins or text, and 300 on net mins.
Whereas on say Orange (leaving the sinking ship) "Rat" tariff, no one has a
clue
what the hell they get
FT Orange have spent so much time, effort, and huge wads of money on
"animal",
no one in the exec office will admit the truth that the "emperor has no
clothes on"
As of course it would mean sackings all around
Steve Terry
Jon Parker - 26 May 2008 11:29 GMT
> Umm... let me see, on easy to understand 3 PAYG Stretch 15 (quid)
> i get 300 mins or text, and 300 on net mins.
I would suggest that a reasonable portion of non-industry people would
not know what "on-net" means.
> Whereas on say Orange (leaving the sinking ship) "Rat" tariff, no one has a
> clue what the hell they get
Of course they will have a clue. It's not difficult to understand, and
the in-box literature is as plain and simple as it could possibly be!

Signature
Regards
Jon
Steve Terry - 26 May 2008 17:40 GMT
>> Umm... let me see, on easy to understand 3 PAYG Stretch 15 (quid)
>> i get 300 mins or text, and 300 on net mins.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Regards
> Jon
Ummm... why should I have to learn to interpret FT Oranges
animal totem obsession?
Steve Terry