>Do a manual scan on your phone, should show networks it's found,
>but it doesn't mean they are strong enough to be useable
The coverage checkers for various networks are a reasonable
indication.
O2 http://www.webmap.o2.co.uk/?Search=Search
Orange http://coverage.orange.co.uk/uk/UKCoverageSearch.htm
Three http://www.three.co.uk/personal/coverage_/coverageChecker.do
(though their 2G coverage is obviously the same as Orange)
T-Mobile http://www.t-mobile.co.uk/services/coverage/street-check/
Vodafone http://maps.vodafone.co.uk/coverageviewer/web/default.aspx
If somebody were to write an app that checked all 5 (or 4 2G)
providers coverage for a postcode in one go, perhaps with a map, I
would feel obliged to have their kids.

Signature
to email remove .lartsspammers
http://www.kingqueen.org.uk
Steve Terry - 28 Aug 2008 18:50 GMT
>>Do a manual scan on your phone, should show networks it's found,
>>but it doesn't mean they are strong enough to be useable
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> providers coverage for a postcode in one go, perhaps with a map,
> I would feel obliged to have their kids.
and if a networks map says you have coverage,
and your phone on manual scan doesn't find it?
You have too much faith in the maps to have kids for it
Steve Terry
Doug Paulley - 29 Aug 2008 22:55 GMT
>and if a networks map says you have coverage,
>and your phone on manual scan doesn't find it?
>
>You have too much faith in the maps to have kids for it
good point; they are a handy reference though.

Signature
to email remove .lartsspammers
http://www.kingqueen.org.uk
Mark Carver - 28 Aug 2008 19:49 GMT
> Vodafone http://maps.vodafone.co.uk/coverageviewer/web/default.aspx
There is bugger all Vodafone signal in my house, or in a several hundred yard
radius from it. Yet that checker shows a uniform 'good' signal.

Signature
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.
Steve Terry - 28 Aug 2008 19:55 GMT
>> Vodafone http://maps.vodafone.co.uk/coverageviewer/web/default.aspx
>
> There is bugger all Vodafone signal in my house, or in a several hundred
> yard radius from it. Yet that checker shows a uniform 'good' signal.
> Mark
Lies, dammed Lies, and Mobile network maps.
Steve Terry
Mark - 29 Aug 2008 11:17 GMT
>> Vodafone http://maps.vodafone.co.uk/coverageviewer/web/default.aspx
>
>There is bugger all Vodafone signal in my house, or in a several hundred yard
>radius from it. Yet that checker shows a uniform 'good' signal.
Same for me with T-Mobile and it shows a "Very Good" signal for most
of the area.

Signature
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Owing to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
(")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking most articles
posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
everyone you will need use a different method of posting.
See http://improve-usenet.org
Dennis Ferguson - 28 Aug 2008 21:08 GMT
>>Do a manual scan on your phone, should show networks it's found,
>>but it doesn't mean they are strong enough to be useable
>
> The coverage checkers for various networks are a reasonable
> indication.
My rule of thumb is that a coverage map with enough detail to
tell you whether your house is in a coverage hole or not will
necessarily have enough detail to tell you approximately where
the towers are as well.
Since none of the UK carrier maps give you any hint about the
latter I doubt they are capable of telling you the former either.
I know it is possible to compute quite precise coverage maps
since at least one of the US carriers does it for its native
coverage, e.g.
http://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/pcc.aspx
(if you want some zip codes, 94301, 22203 and 10606 are places I've
lived). Since the UK carrier maps don't look like that I don't think
I would trust them for too much.
Dennis Ferguson