Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Verizon / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Aren't there any cell phones that work?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dejola - 27 Sep 2006 20:19 GMT
I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
customers. Why, you ask? Here's why.

Getting anything done at these Verizon Online retail stores is harder
than getting an audience with the Pope. You wait on line for long
periods of time and when finally you get to talk with someone he are
often less than knowledgeable about the products they sell, cell
phones.
Typically we have succumbed to the recommendation of he sales rep and
typically the phone he/she recommends proves to be problematic. They
have almost exclusively been Motorola phones. If it's not he
rediculously-fragile charger connection weakness, its the dreaded red
dot under the battery that indicates water damage, damage that seems to
occur even when the humidity gets above 65 per cent.

What does one have to do to get a good solid reliable cell phone
without the games, without the cameras, and  without the zillions of
ring tones? Just a phone that can be counted on to work when you need
it and charge properly when the battery runs down.

Is there such a phone out there made by anyone? Or is it Verizon that's
the problem.

I am at wits end, having to periodically spend additional money after
an initial phone purchase to get a new phone to replace ones that have
failed for one reason or another, notwithstanding Verizon's offer of a
$100 credit towards a new phone.

Can anyone recommend a good reliable plain cell phone and perhaps a
better service provider, notwithstanding Verizon's claim to have he
best service in the New York Metropolitan area?

Thank you.
Andy S - 27 Sep 2006 22:11 GMT
Suggest you try Cingular then.

Signature

Andrew D. Sisson
LG VX8100  VZW AC II   SINCE APRIL 1993
SonyEricsson Z525a CINGULAR NATION SINCE MARCH 2006

>I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Thank you.
Dejola - 27 Sep 2006 22:48 GMT
Thank you, Andrew. I'll consider that.

> Suggest you try Cingular then.
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> >
> > Thank you.
Ron Hinds - 02 Oct 2006 02:17 GMT
> Suggest you try Cingular then.

Not if he wants any of the problems he mentions solved!

>>I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
>> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>> Thank you.
Dean - 27 Sep 2006 22:42 GMT
I do agree with part of your post. Unfortunately, Verizon Wireless stores
have become the new Department of Motor Vehicles, but worse, except for the
wait. Imagine if the DMV employees knew as little about their jobs as the
VZW staff.

I believe that the management at VZW is fully aware that the staff in their
stores is incapable of solving the problems and answering the questions of a
certain percentage of their customers, but they have made a corporate
decision at very high levels. The choice was to educate ALL of their staff
to equal or better knowledge than ALL their customers, at great expense, OR
to target a minimal level which would satisfy 90% of their customers. I
can't really say that from a strictly business standpoint, it was a bad
decision.

Simply put; the average rep in the stores I've visited has no idea what the
PRL is or what it does. Therefore, if I go in with a PRL problem, they are
likely incapable of solving it. However, less than 10% (probably more like
5%) of their customers know or care what a PRL is. Management knows this, so
they know in advance that 5 or 10 or whatever percent of customers will not
get their problems solved in the store. They also know that the level of
knowledge they target CAN satisfy 90-95% of customers, and that's good
enough for them.

It might cost VZW hundreds of thousands (or millions) to educate the retail
staff up a level or two, and they've decided it isn't cost-effective. Again,
strictly from a business standpoint, maybe they're right. Remember the magic
formula Stores=RETAIL.

Of course, we of the 5-10% are the ones who bear the brunt of the
frustration. Oh, well. We of the minority also know that almost anyone above
the 1st level of PHONE tech support is worlds ahead of anyone in the stores.
Different kind of people completely.
Therefore, when we have a true technical problem, the store is the LAST
place we turn to.

Don't blame them in the stores, they are RETAIL staff, there to SELL. I
cringe when I listen to the questions they have to answer. How do I get a
dial tone on this thing? Sheeeeeit. If I sell my old phone to a friend, do I
lose the number with the phone? You gotta be kidding.

In recent years, I've owned Verizon phones from Moto, Audiovox, LG and
Kyocera. The Moto phones seemed to have the best signals, but recent models
(after the v60) have been buggy. I love my e815 to death, but it has quirks
that are inexcusable. On the other hand, I've owned 6 Toshiba-made
Audiovox's which were 100% bug-free, worked perfectly from out of the box
until retired. Signal performance: ok, but not "hot". My daughter had a
lower-model LG---bug-free, but poor signal. Wife's newest is a vx8300. I'm
very impressed with build quality, display, and audio. We haven't made a
trip to the boonies yet, so I'll reserve decision on the signal until we do,
but so far, so good. I didn't want to like the phone, but I do. It even has
sidetone!!!

Sorry you've had bad luck with VZW. Ours has been pretty good.

Dean

>I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Thank you.
Homer - 27 Sep 2006 23:37 GMT
> I do agree with part of your post. Unfortunately, Verizon Wireless
> stores have become the new Department of Motor Vehicles, but worse,
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
>>
>> Thank you.

I agree with the above top poster except that what ever happend to:

1)  A plain, simple device that will ring when a call comes in and connect
when you need to talk to someone....reliably.  They use to call it a
phone.  Personally, I have the Treo 650 and LOVE it.  Need it..no but I
really use nearly all of it's functions.

2) Employees that care enough about their job and future to actualy take
it upon themselves to learn the products and services?  I have been in the
computer business for years and learning never stops.  Mostly, I learn at
home on my own buck and time.

JohnS

Signature

‰PNG

Dejola - 27 Sep 2006 23:55 GMT
I'm with you, JohnS.

It bugs me when I hear things like "Nobody ever taught me that." People
need to take the initiative and aggressively seek out the knowledge
they will need to navigate through life.

> > I do agree with part of your post. Unfortunately, Verizon Wireless
> > stores have become the new Department of Motor Vehicles, but worse,
[quoted text clipped - 100 lines]
>
> JohnS
Dejola - 28 Sep 2006 00:02 GMT
Thanks, Dean, for your insight. Poor customer service is reaching
epidemic proportions in many fields. One time I was in a checkout line
at a supermarket. The cashier rang me up without a word. As I left I
said, "What, no thank you,  have a nice day?" She replied, "It's
written on the receipt."

What I need a a tough phone like those Panasonic notebook computers
they call "ToughBooks."

> I do agree with part of your post. Unfortunately, Verizon Wireless stores
> have become the new Department of Motor Vehicles, but worse, except for the
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
> >
> > Thank you.
Cliff & Linda Miata - 04 Oct 2006 06:01 GMT
You want tough go with Nextel. They have phones as tough as the Panasonic
Toughbooks. Maybe tougher.
rocxspam - 28 Sep 2006 00:09 GMT
The OP did write "Verizon Online retail stores", and mentioned waiting
online, so your "dissertation" seems to have targeted the wrong venue
with the brick-and-mortar store employees - interesting though  ;-}

> I do agree with part of your post. Unfortunately, Verizon Wireless stores
> have become the new Department of Motor Vehicles, but worse, except for the
> wait. Imagine if the DMV employees knew as little about their jobs as the
> VZW staff.
>
>...

However, for the reliability issue, the OP might consider what I have
done: I have made the decision to pay the extra $6.95/month for complete
replacement coverage on my Nokia 6236i since it doubles as my pager for
work via SMS.   However, when they start showing up on Ebay for
something close to the (ridiculous) Lockline $50 deductible, I will
probably drop that coverage, and pick one up as a spare, unless I decide
to just use my old 6015i or 3589i in that role - nothing really wrong
with them, just clunkier, and fewer (non-essential) bells and whistles.
 They also have the advantage of being tri-mode for what that's still
worth...

ROC
Dean - 28 Sep 2006 02:44 GMT
As Homer Simpson became famous for saying:

"DOH!!"

Yeah, he did say Verizon Online. Sorry. I read too fast and thought he was
referring to brick-and-mortar. I do stand by my little rant, though.

Thanks for pointing out my error.

Dean

> The OP did write "Verizon Online retail stores", and mentioned waiting
> online, so your "dissertation" seems to have targeted the wrong venue with
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> ROC
Peter Pan - 28 Sep 2006 03:42 GMT
Sounded like he was referring to a brick and mortar store and just got the
name wrong... How can you stand in line and take a number for the online
website store thing?

> As Homer Simpson became famous for saying:
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> (non-essential) bells and whistles. They also have the advantage of
>> being tri-mode for what that's still worth... ROC
Steven J. Sobol - 28 Sep 2006 04:24 GMT
> Sounded like he was referring to a brick and mortar store and just got the
> name wrong... How can you stand in line and take a number for the online
> website store thing?

I don't know, but here and in other places where Verizon does landlines,
you can go to a Verizon Plus store where you can order and pay for Verizon
telephone service, Verizon Online DSL or FiOS, Dish TV and Verizon Wireless
cellular. Maybe that's what he meant?

Signature

Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
Apple Valley, California     PGP:0xE3AE35ED

It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.

Quaoar - 28 Sep 2006 03:08 GMT
> I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Thank you.

Try the Verizon kiosk in Circuit City.

Q
Lou - 28 Sep 2006 13:24 GMT
> I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Thank you.

Go visit the cellphone kiosk inside a Costco.
Costco backs everything they sell without service contracts.

Lou
Nick Danger - 28 Sep 2006 21:38 GMT
> What does one have to do to get a good solid reliable cell phone
> without the games, without the cameras, and  without the zillions of
> ring tones? Just a phone that can be counted on to work when you need
> it and charge properly when the battery runs down.

The question was asked in today's New York Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/technology/28pogue.html You can even get
one with a dial tone.
Ron Hinds - 02 Oct 2006 02:33 GMT
>> What does one have to do to get a good solid reliable cell phone
>> without the games, without the cameras, and  without the zillions of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/technology/28pogue.html You can even get
> one with a dial tone.

I just recently received a LG VX3450. So far, I'm very happy. It is very
easy to use and the signal (I'm in a rural area) has been excellent. I don't
think the OP would be any more pleased with the in-store staff knowledge of
any other provider. They just don't pay those people enough to get
geniuses...
GG - 29 Sep 2006 01:52 GMT
> I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
> customers. Why, you ask? Here's why.
>
> Getting anything done at these Verizon Online retail stores is harder
> than getting an audience with the Pope.

Well there's your problem. Verizon Online is for DSL. You need Verizon
Wireless.
none@none.net - 29 Sep 2006 02:21 GMT
As a Verizon Rep for a NOKIA 6256i.  It is a "combat ready" phone.
Yes, it has everything but it will make and recieve calls where no
other phone will.  It is 800 and 1900 Mhtz, CDMA and analog, what
sales staff try to call Tri MODE.

The NOKIA CDMA / analog phones will work in urban and rural areas. The
only place I have been without good coverage on an interstate east of
the Mississippi River has been a few (very few) interstate spaces in
the Appalachian mountains.  I am talking about places where even a GPS
box cannot see anything below 60 degrees elevation.

j

>I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
>customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
>Thank you.
sd - 30 Sep 2006 14:26 GMT
> As a Verizon Rep for a NOKIA 6256i.  It is a "combat ready" phone.
> Yes, it has everything but it will make and recieve calls where no
> other phone will.

Agreed that the 6256i is a very good phone, even after the crippling
it received at the hands of VZW's techs. But good luck asking for
one at a Verizon B&M. They never carried the phone and half the reps
I spoke with had never even heard of it. I got mine at a Circuit
City VZW kiosk 8-9 months ago -- and, at that, had to find one of
the few that had some or knew when more would be arriving.

I'd still go with a Nokia for the coverage and its ability to meet
the OP's needs. I think VZW still offers the 2128i -- your basic
dial-and-get-calls phone. It is, however, digital only, though in
NYC, it doesn't seem like that would be an issue.

sd
Notan - 30 Sep 2006 16:08 GMT
> As a Verizon Rep for a NOKIA 6256i.  It is a "combat ready" phone.
> Yes, it has everything but it will make and recieve calls where no
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> <snip>

While a tri-mode phone certainly has the best possibility of obtaining
a signal, what makes this one better than all others?

Has anyone done a side-by-side comparison?

Notan
XS11E - 29 Sep 2006 16:18 GMT
> I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
> customers. Why, you ask? Here's why.
>
> Getting anything done at these Verizon Online retail stores is harder
> than getting an audience with the Pope.

Stick with Verizon but do all your dealings on line or on the telephone!
I've learned the hard way that Verizon staffs all their stores with people
who are not qualified to do any more than breathe while the online personel
are very qualified.  Phone 'em or get them on line and NEVER go near the
idiots who staff the Verizon stores, you'll be amazed at the difference!
SMS - 02 Oct 2006 17:15 GMT
> Typically we have succumbed to the recommendation of he sales rep and
> typically the phone he/she recommends proves to be problematic. They
> have almost exclusively been Motorola phones. If it's not he
> rediculously-fragile charger connection weakness, its the dreaded red
> dot under the battery that indicates water damage, damage that seems to
> occur even when the humidity gets above 65 per cent.

The newer Motorola phones don't have the charger connection problem that
you refer too (I have suffered from that as well, it's a real pain in
the butt).

You want to be sure that you get a tri-mode phone, and not an
"All-Digital" phone. This immediately narrows the choices.
Unfortunately, it's no longer easy to get a phone without a camera.

You never want to blindly buy a phone at a Verizon store, you want to do
your research first. Salespeople are trained to push the most profitable
handsets, with the most chance to upsell added services.

When you do buy a new phone, try to get it at Costco if you are a
member, as they have a far, far  better warranty than the Verizon
stores, or other dealers.

I never had the humidity problem, though I do have a phone that fell
into my swimming pool and I do see that red dot. I've been to very high
humidity areas (Florida in August) and have not had the dot turn red
problem.

I recently got a Motorola V325 and have been reasonably happy with it.
It has excellent reception, and the new charger plug (mini-USB) has
eliminated the problem of a bad charger connection. Motorola Phone Tools
makes it easy to manage the contact list on the computer, so you don't
have to enter numbers on the phone (though of course MPT also works with
the older Motorola phones). I did have to make some modifications to the
firmware to undo some things that Verizon made Motorola do to the phone,
such as disabling "vibrate then ring," and disabling the ability to use
MPT to upload ringtones, and download or upload photos. The voice
dialing is not very good, about half the time when you say "Name Dial"
it doesn't respond with "Say the Name" instead it redials the previous call.

The New York metro area is very problematic. Sprint and T-Mobile are at
1900 MHz-Only and should be avoided if good coverage outside urban reas,
and coverage inside big buildings is an issue.

Cingular is using the AT&T wireless network, which has capacity issues
(prior to the acquisition of AT&T, Cingular was using the T-Mobile
network in NY Metro, and T-Mobile was using the Cingular network in the
western region (California and Nevada). Also, Cingular and T-Mobile are
GSM-only, which isn't a problem until you get out into the boonies of
some states, where the only coverage is AMPS. So Verizon remains the
best choice if coverage is your primary concern, and all of the
independent surveys confirm this fact.
Mark Crispin - 04 Oct 2006 02:43 GMT
> You want to be sure that you get a tri-mode phone, and not an "All-Digital"
> phone. This immediately narrows the choices.

I'm not certain that I agree with this advice.  I have three North
American phones: VZW in the lower 48, Dobson Cellular One (GSM) in Alaska,
and Telus Mobility in Canada.  The Telus phone is the only one that is
still tri-mode instead of all-digital.

I take the Telus phone with me when I go to obscure areas of the USA, just
in case I hit an analog-only area.  However, I've found that the analog
capability hasn't helped much at all.  If there isn't a usable digital
signal, I've generally found the analog signal to be equally unusable; but
having analog on the phone means that its battery is eaten much faster.

The situation was very different as recently as one year ago.  One by one,
the vast analog-only areas are vanishing.  I'll probably replace the
tri-band with a Motorola a840 next year when my renewal term with Telus
comes up.

Of course, your mileage may vary.  You should consider this advice, along
with the other guy's advice, as just that: advice which may or may not
apply to your circumstances.

> You never want to blindly buy a phone at a Verizon store, you want to do your
> research first.

I agree.  Fortunately for me, the phone I choose (Motorola a840) was not
one that the VZW stores carry anyway.

> Also, Cingular and T-Mobile are GSM-only, which
> isn't a problem until you get out into the boonies of some states, where the
> only coverage is AMPS.

How many analog-only areas continue to exist?  I've been to some of those
analog-only areas (according to maps) and found digital.m

> So Verizon remains the best choice if coverage is your
> primary concern, and all of the independent surveys confirm this fact.

Agreed.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
SMS - 04 Oct 2006 06:05 GMT
> How many analog-only areas continue to exist?

Quite a lot in California. Areas I go to where AMPS is all that is
available include several areas in the Sierras, including around
Kirkwood on 88, along the southern San Mateo Coast, along the North
coast of California, in parts of Yosemite, in parts of the Santa Cruz
Mountains, and in parts of Marin county. In each of these areas, I'd be
willing to wager that every AMPS site also has digital. However AMPS
signals have more range than CDMA, and a lot more range than GSM. So
you'll find AMPS coverage well beyond the range of digital.
Dennis Ferguson - 04 Oct 2006 08:03 GMT
>> How many analog-only areas continue to exist?
[...]
> Mountains, and in parts of Marin county. In each of these areas, I'd be
> willing to wager that every AMPS site also has digital. However AMPS
> signals have more range than CDMA, and a lot more range than GSM. So
> you'll find AMPS coverage well beyond the range of digital.

I don't believe AMPS signals have more range than CDMA, certainly
not from your power-limited modern handset to the tower.  You might
do better with AMPS from a 3W carphone than with CDMA from a 200 mW
digital handheld, but 800 MHz CDMA will do at least as well as AMPS at
the same power level.  Anything else would defy physics.

My experience in Mexico is more like the first poster.  I keep my
LG phone set to CDMA-only there since otherwise the phone keeps
switching from a marginal, but still working, CDMA service to an
AMPS service which produces more bars on the phone display but
which doesn't work at all when you try to use it.

Dennis Ferguson
SMS - 05 Oct 2006 00:11 GMT
> My experience in Mexico is more like the first poster.  I keep my
> LG phone set to CDMA-only there since otherwise the phone keeps
> switching from a marginal, but still working, CDMA service to an
> AMPS service which produces more bars on the phone display but
> which doesn't work at all when you try to use it.

If you go to Verizon's coverage maps, you can see a big difference in
coverage between AC1 and AC2 in rural areas. Both AC1 and AC2 can use
almost every CDMA network in the U.S, though with AC1 some of them will
require paid roaming, while AC2 doesn't have any paid roaming. The big
difference between AC1 and AC2 is AMPS, and the difference in terms of
area is very large. I.e, look at zip code 95646, with AC1 and with AC2.
Large areas of "roaming or no coverage" disappear when you switch from
AC1 to AC2. In my experience in the Sierras, a great deal of "roaming or
no coverage" is non-Verizon AMPS coverage. It's not something that you
want to bet your life on, but it can be very useful nevertheless.

You can also see a really big difference if you use 94060. A very large
part of the Santa Cruz mountains has no digital coverage. AMPS coverage
is there because it's needed for the roadside call boxes. This is an
area that we go to a lot as there are many state and county parks in the
area, and it includes the northern Santa Cruz county area, and the
southern San Mateo coast area. No digital coverage of any kind, only
AMPS. The good thing is that the carrier can't shut it off until they
replace it with digital, as the call boxes need to be kept in service.
Mark Crispin - 05 Oct 2006 01:31 GMT
> If you go to Verizon's coverage maps, you can see a big difference in
> coverage between AC1 and AC2 in rural areas.

I know from personal experience that those maps are obsolete and quite
inaccurate.  They show areas in western Washington State as being analog
only that have had CDMA and GSM for years.

> In my experience in the
> Sierras, a great deal of "roaming or no coverage" is non-Verizon AMPS
> coverage. It's not something that you want to bet your life on, but it can be
> very useful nevertheless.

I'll have to take your word about that and the SF peninsula coast area.
It has been nearly two decades since I was last to either; and it is quite
unlikely that I will ever be there again.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
George - 05 Oct 2006 02:23 GMT
>> My experience in Mexico is more like the first poster.  I keep my
>> LG phone set to CDMA-only there since otherwise the phone keeps
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> AMPS. The good thing is that the carrier can't shut it off until they
> replace it with digital, as the call boxes need to be kept in service.

Unless they pull the call boxes. I am in PA and there are already some
highways were the boxes were removed because the small amount of use
didn't justify keeping them.
CharlesH - 14 Oct 2006 19:29 GMT
> Unless they pull the call boxes. I am in PA and there are already some
> highways were the boxes were removed because the small amount of use
> didn't justify keeping them.

Last I heard, they were going to upgrade the call boxes to CDMA here in
California, but remove half of them (going from 1/8 mile spacing to 1/4
mile spacing), due to low usage. Whenever there is an accident, the 911
center gets swamped with calls.
Mark Crispin - 05 Oct 2006 01:26 GMT
> My experience in Mexico is more like the first poster.  I keep my
> LG phone set to CDMA-only there since otherwise the phone keeps
> switching from a marginal, but still working, CDMA service to an
> AMPS service which produces more bars on the phone display but
> which doesn't work at all when you try to use it.

That is also my experience in the north country (Yukon and Alaska) in the
past several years.  It has been years since I last experienced a usable
AMPS signal when there was not working CDMA or GSM service.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
ephedralover@hotmail.com - 03 Oct 2006 17:10 GMT
> I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Thank you.

Look at all available phones. Goto Cnet and look at the reviews. Do
your own research. The yayhoos at the retail stores are minimum wage
morons just waiting to get off so they can score some meth.
Thomas T. Veldhouse - 03 Oct 2006 17:36 GMT
> Look at all available phones. Goto Cnet and look at the reviews. Do
> your own research. The yayhoos at the retail stores are minimum wage
> morons just waiting to get off so they can score some meth.

Ephedralover huh?  So ... you must work at a retail store earning minimum wage
... moron.

Signature

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE  34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

ephedralover@hotmail.com - 03 Oct 2006 17:41 GMT
> > Look at all available phones. Goto Cnet and look at the reviews. Do
> > your own research. The yayhoos at the retail stores are minimum wage
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thomas T. Veldhouse
> Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE  34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

No, I pug your wifes a.shole for cash.
Thomas T. Veldhouse - 03 Oct 2006 17:51 GMT
> No, I pug your wifes a.shole for cash.

Oh ... she's got income on the side?  I will have to talk with her about that.

Signature

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE  34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

ephedralover@hotmail.com - 03 Oct 2006 18:01 GMT
> > No, I pug your wifes a.shole for cash.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Thomas T. Veldhouse
> Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE  34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

Actually its outcome.
clifto - 04 Oct 2006 20:56 GMT
>> > No, I pug your wifes a.shole for cash.
>>
>> Oh ... she's got income on the side?  I will have to talk with her about that.
>
> Actually its outcome.

What comes out of his wife's a.s probably isn't ephedra.

Signature

                       More abuse of eminent domain!
                      http://www.villagelandgrab.com/

sonofabitchsky@hotmail.com - 04 Oct 2006 22:42 GMT
> ephedralo...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >> ephedralo...@hotmail.com wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>                         More abuse of eminent domain!
>                        http://www.villagelandgrab.com/

No, that has long been assimilated.
SMS - 03 Oct 2006 17:40 GMT
> Look at all available phones. Goto Cnet and look at the reviews. Do
> your own research. The yayhoos at the retail stores are minimum wage
> morons just waiting to get off so they can score some meth.

Well I wouldn't go that far, but they are trained to sell the most
profitable handsets and services, rather than what works the best.
Cliff & Linda Miata - 04 Oct 2006 06:04 GMT
What a moronic subject line. This troll suggests that the verizon network
is not carrying any calls because none of there phones work. Right.
tex - 04 Oct 2006 14:11 GMT
>I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
>customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
>Thank you.

Tough one. We are locked in...the others don't have the coverage VZ is
supposed to have......and I mean 'supposed to have'-as, in my job, I
travel a lot.....lots of issues with the service.
The store is one place I would not want to work....ever!

I have found problems with all the phones, excepting the ones that
were just 'phones'! They worked. However they did none of the other
non phone things. Now my 8300 does everything but eat---VZ does that
well I am certain of that.

I had to use my old Audivox 9500 for the six months prior to 'renewal'
time as it flat out had more power...then I find that the older phones
were allowed to be higher powered.......

We are victims of our own supposed needs to have and all in one
solution to whatever problem we think we have. I mean do I need to
carry around a phone that has dual speakers, can talk and listen to
me, can store up to 1 GB of data on an SD card, can store and play
lots of songs, can connect to my computer, etc?

If we want a phone we should just have a phone and at least be able to
complain about it's reception.
Now I have lots of gripes that I would not have with a plain jane
phone!
FWIW.
Tex

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

ednj2002@yahoo.com - 15 Oct 2006 16:25 GMT
> I need some advice. Members of my family have been Verizon Wireless
> customers for several years now, but we are not what you'd call happy
> customers. Why, you ask? Here's why.

Not all Motos are bad.  I have been using an E815 for over a year with
no problems.  It holds a signal in fringe areas and has very good
audio.  Unfortunately, they are not offered in the stores, but you can
get one on eBay.

Ed
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.