That's all fine and dandy, however........

It's a fact that Sprint's 1900Mhz signal does NOT get into modern buildings
as well as Verizon's 880Mhz does.

While Sprint's data thruput looks nice, their RF coverage doesn't (In
Southern California). NO signal=NO data....

I love you web "journalists" write things they don't know anything about,
because it sounds good.

"The increased capacity allowed by 1900mhz towers means Sprint (so far)
isn't cracking down on users who suck down more than their fair share of
bandwidth."

1900 is LESS desirable.  Higher frequencies have less power per bit, and
don't carry as far, or penetrate into buildings as well.  The reason Sprint
isn't as worried about it's network is that it doens't have as many
customers, so doesn't have to worry nearly so much about capacity!

I used Sprint for a while.
The reception was lousy.
They arbitrarily extended my contract for two years when I changed to
a new phone.

Customer Service 101: Sprint PCS gets D-

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/columnist/lamb/0012.htm

To get the full flavor, do a Google search for   "Sprint sucks"