 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General General TopicsGSMBluetoothProviders AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizonManufacturers EricssonNokiaMotorolaCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupRelated Topics PocketPCPalmMore Topics ... |
Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Verizon / November 2006LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870 ?
Anyone care to comment on LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870 ? I'm replacing all the equipment (over 30) for a business and have narrowed the choice to those three. All are basic tri-mode flip-phones with bluetooth. I'm only interested in the phone functionality (call quality, reception, battery life, durability, annoyances, etc.) and don't care, for example, how well the cameras work. I'd be especially interested in hearing from foks who've tried more than one of these and what they like or don't like about them. > Anyone care to comment on LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870 > ? I'm replacing all the equipment (over 30) for a business and have [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I'd be especially interested in hearing from foks who've tried more > than one of these and what they like or don't like about them. I work for an Authorized Agent in ND, and I would have to vote for the V325i. We currently sell all three models and use the VX5300 for our demo phone at our second location, but I would still stick with the Moto. I have not tried the new i model with bluetooth, but if they didn't screw up the phone adding it, I would say go for it. I base my decision on your functionality requirements. ShackAttack > Anyone care to comment on LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870 > ? I'm replacing all the equipment (over 30) for a business and have [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I'd be especially interested in hearing from foks who've tried more > than one of these and what they like or don't like about them. I have had the 870 for 2 months. Other than it getting warm after 20 minutes it has been better than the Moto V265 I had. Also, it does not have the antenna sticking up! I have not tried voice dialing etc. But the screen, including number dialed, is easy to read. Reception has been very good. I think you need to try each anyway. Lou > Anyone care to comment on LG VX5300 vs. Moto V325i vs. Samsung SCH-a870 > ? I'm replacing all the equipment (over 30) for a business and have [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I'd be especially interested in hearing from foks who've tried more > than one of these and what they like or don't like about them. I have the v325i , my g/f has the vx5300 & a buddy has the the Samsung model.While all have BT that work's about the same neither the LG or Samsung come close to the v325's reception. If they come out pretty much equal re what options they have & your needs...go with the v325i. -- |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.