Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Verizon / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Switching to Verizon...Which Phone ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael - 29 Mar 2004 18:08 GMT
Trying to decide from either the Nokia 3589i or Kyocera SE47. I am currently
a T-mobile customer and I am not happy at all with the lousy reception of
the SonyEricson T300
Andrew - 29 Mar 2004 18:45 GMT
: Trying to decide from either the Nokia 3589i or Kyocera SE47. I am currently
: a T-mobile customer and I am not happy at all with the lousy reception of
: the SonyEricson T300

The 3589i is awesome - I'm thrilled with mine.  Great reception, great
battery life.

Andrew
--
----> Portland, Oregon, USA <----
*******************************************************************
----> http://www.bizave.com  <---- Photo Albums and Portland Info
----> To Email me remove "MYSHOES" from email address
*******************************************************************
James H. Fox - 29 Mar 2004 19:40 GMT
> The 3589i is awesome - I'm thrilled with mine.  Great reception, great
> battery life.
>
> Andrew

I second that.
Just Reading - 30 Mar 2004 18:30 GMT
>>The 3589i is awesome - I'm thrilled with mine.  Great reception, great
>>battery life.
>>
>>Andrew
>
> I second that.

As a customer who is happy with both T-Mobile and Verizon, I would agree
the 3589i is a very good *phone*.  I use my phone mainly as a phone, so
that's what I rate it for, and as a phone the 3589i is very good --
great reception, to my ears acceptable voice quality (actually very good
quality for the person at the other end of the call) and very good (for
CDMA) battery life, though using the display a lot will shorten it markedly.

Cons *as a phone* are color display which is unreadable without
backlight, and directional buttons that take you to possibly pay-per-use
services (browser and getmore).  You also need a rather expensive cable
to backup the phonebook to a computer: no IR or BlueTooth.

(My current T-Mobile phone is now old: a Motorola P280 which has great
call quality, great reception if there is a T-Mobile signal within
sniffing distance and so-so (but adequate) battery life.)
Traveling Man - 31 Mar 2004 02:44 GMT
> Cons *as a phone* are color display which is unreadable without
> backlight, and directional buttons that take you to possibly pay-per-use
> services (browser and getmore).  You also need a rather expensive cable
> to backup the phonebook to a computer: no IR or BlueTooth.

It also has a crappy resolution on the display (blocky letters like the old
DOS displays), and looks "cheap" to me.

It does work very well though <G>! (my son-in-law has one)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.