Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Verizon / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

v810 -- Release date?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Andrew - 20 Aug 2004 02:34 GMT
Any news as to when the v810 will be released?  Phonescoop says September.
tigercat - 20 Aug 2004 03:15 GMT
looks like your right, this is coming out next month, and they've cleared
some key space up by removing the picture button and changing the position
of the clear button.  this enables them to make a larger navigational button
then on the 710, which will be convenient.

http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=295

> Any news as to when the v810 will be released?  Phonescoop says September.
Brad - 20 Aug 2004 22:47 GMT
What is the main difference between the 810 and 710? That's not clear on
phone scoop.

> looks like your right, this is coming out next month, and they've cleared
> some key space up by removing the picture button and changing the position
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> > Any news as to when the v810 will be released?  Phonescoop says September.
Jesse Gelber - 20 Aug 2004 23:15 GMT
Among a few other things it looks like the 810 lacks a speakerphone, and
Bluetooth. Funny that it mentions it as "Motorola's first CDMA camera phone
for the Americas." Looks a little smaller too.

http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/compare.php?id%5B%5D=295&id%5B%5D=475&id%5B
%5D=&id%5B%5D=&id%5B%5D=

Jesse

> What is the main difference between the 810 and 710? That's not clear on
> phone scoop.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > > Any news as to when the v810 will be released?  Phonescoop says
> September.
Renato Wisocki Junior - 27 Aug 2004 19:47 GMT
There is speakerphone feature on v810.
by the way, I bought one 6 months ago in Brazil.
the bad side is:
the phone DONT have:
*alarm function, just a very poor scheduler's alert which don't wake
anyone.
*pictures,rings,games cable transmittion, you'll have to pay a lot to
transfer trought the service provider.
*1xRTT technology: very expencive on Brazil. almost US$ 2,00 by
picture.
* DONT HAVE JAVA. only brew (poor)
* battery dont take's long.
* no BlueTooth
* only pictures, dont shoot movies.
buy an v878 instead.
http://sg.motorola.com/pcs/v878/sg/motogear.ASP

Hugs
Renato

see my page: (portuguese)
http://www.geocities.com/motorolav810/V810.html

> Among a few other things it looks like the 810 lacks a speakerphone, and
> Bluetooth. Funny that it mentions it as "Motorola's first CDMA camera phone
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> > > > Any news as to when the v810 will be released?  Phonescoop says
>  September.
Kay Anne Darcy - 21 Aug 2004 01:58 GMT
with love: t-h-a-n.
Steven J Sobol - 21 Aug 2004 02:27 GMT
> with love: t-h-a-n.

People who post spelling corrections, especially those who FOLLOW UP to a
post that is otherwise not a bad post with a ONE LINER ONLY CONTAINING A
SPELLING CORRECTION, really suck. Do you find your life now has more meaning
because you were able to correct one person's stupid spelling error?

grrr. $*(#@$*@#(! webtv users. :P

Signature

JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ 
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

Gregg Hill - 21 Aug 2004 03:10 GMT
She also missed "your right" instead of "you're right" in that post.

> > with love: t-h-a-n.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> grrr. $*(#@$*@#(! webtv users. :P
Jonathan Goodish - 21 Aug 2004 03:24 GMT
> > with love: t-h-a-n.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> grrr. $*(#@$*@#(! webtv users. :P

The problem is that misuse of "then" and "than" is so chronic anymore
that it bears correction.  I cringe every time I see it, simply because
it is so common, and is undeniably incorrect.  The two words are not
interchangeable.

JKG
Gregg Hill - 21 Aug 2004 05:32 GMT
How about the prolific use of apostrophes to indicate plurality? I love that
one! I think "Killer Madness" holds the record for apostrophe misuse (as
well as childish foul language).

> > > with love: t-h-a-n.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> JKG
Jadder - 21 Aug 2004 14:38 GMT
"quotation marks" or "inverted commas"

'apostrophe'

I think this thread holds the record for the most grammatical errors.

Stick to cell phones and Verizon service, okay?

> How about the prolific use of apostrophes to indicate plurality? I love that
> one! I think "Killer Madness" holds the record for apostrophe misuse (as
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >
> > JKG
Gregg Hill - 21 Aug 2004 23:07 GMT
If you are trying to correct my post, I missed your point. What is it
(besides sticking to Verizon service)?

Gregg

> "quotation marks" or "inverted commas"
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > >
> > > JKG
Kay Anne Darcy - 21 Aug 2004 17:13 GMT
it wasn't a spelling correction, dimwit.
Steven J Sobol - 21 Aug 2004 19:32 GMT
> it wasn't a spelling correction, dimwit.

Technically, it *was*. :) (he didn't spell "than" correctly, now did he!)

Or if you prefer, it was a usage correction.

Either way, it was pointless and stupid.

Signature

JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ 
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

Michelle Steiner - 21 Aug 2004 19:46 GMT
> Either way, it was pointless and stupid.

But it is usenet, so pointless and stupid is the norm.

Signature

Stop Mad Cowboy Disease:  Vote for John Kerry.

Kay Anne Darcy - 21 Aug 2004 19:57 GMT
Since you ask.. no, technically it was not a spelling correction.

(To indicate a question a question mark is customarily used and not an
exclamation point).
Michelle Steiner - 21 Aug 2004 20:22 GMT
> Since you ask.. no, technically it was not a spelling correction.
>
> (To indicate a question a question mark is customarily used and not
> an exclamation point).

That should be, "To indicate a question, a question mark, not an
exclamation point, is customarily used."

However, that is in the passive voice, and you should try to avoid using
the passive voice, so try this instead:  "Use a question mark, not an
exclamation point, to indicate a question."

YWIA

-- Michelle

Signature

Stop Mad Cowboy Disease:  Vote for John Kerry.

Steven J Sobol - 21 Aug 2004 22:00 GMT
> Since you ask.. no, technically it was not a spelling correction.
>
> (To indicate a question a question mark is customarily used and not an
> exclamation point).

OK, fine. Usage, not spelling. You never answered my other question. Do you
actually enjoy posting spelling/grammer/usage flames with no content relevant
to the topic being discussed?

Signature

JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ 
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

Gambino Paul J - 22 Aug 2004 05:11 GMT
>People who post spelling corrections, especially those who FOLLOW UP to a
>post that is otherwise not a bad post with a ONE LINER ONLY CONTAINING A
>SPELLING CORRECTION, really suck. Do you find your life now has more meaning
>because you were able to correct one person's stupid spelling error?
---------------------------------------------------------
THIS IS SO TRUE. PEOPLE THAT CORRECT SPELLING ARE PETTY AND SMALL MINDED. NOT
VERY ORIGINAL TOO!
speedlever - 22 Aug 2004 11:10 GMT
>>People who post spelling corrections, especially those who FOLLOW UP
>>to a post that is otherwise not a bad post with a ONE LINER ONLY
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> THIS IS SO TRUE. PEOPLE THAT CORRECT SPELLING ARE PETTY AND SMALL
> MINDED. NOT VERY ORIGINAL TOO!

What you should take into consideration is that while the spelling
corrector is probably not winning friends, the fact is that spelling and
grammar errors reflect poorly on the OP.

The reality (for me) is that even though I try to quickly proofread
before posting, errors still creep in. Hopefully I correct the more
blatant errors in my posts.

And you really don't need to SHOUT to get your message across. ;-)

Just MHO, FWIW.
Gregg Hill - 21 Aug 2004 03:08 GMT
Kay,

You missed "your right" instead of "you're right" in that post.

Gregg

> with love: t-h-a-n.
Motorola V810 - 30 Aug 2004 17:34 GMT
Lets talk about Motorola V810 ????

> Kay,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> > with love: t-h-a-n.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.