Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Verizon / January 2005
Conditioning !--Alright, guys, I know this gets asked a lot!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Janie Collins - 16 Jan 2005 00:09 GMT I have done all the research I know to do on this (including an "ask" search whereby I was taken to my own same question 2 years ago to Steve Sobol). I keep getting completely opposite information such as: "Draining an L-ion battery causes more harm than good," to "you should charge for 10-12 hours initially, then drain charge completely--repeat cycle 3 times".
Since I'm getting a new phone on Monday, I want to charge the battery properly from the get-go.
Any and all *knowledgeable* (big grin!) info will be greatly appreciated!
Janie
Peter Pan - 16 Jan 2005 00:29 GMT > I have done all the research I know to do on this (including an "ask" > search whereby I was taken to my own same question 2 years ago to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > appreciated! > Janie Don't know how much this will help, http://www.batteryuniversity.com/parttwo-34.htm But it is *NOT* a Nicad battery, and I tell people there is *NO* memory effect, charge it once and keep it charged whenever possible.
Janie Collins - 16 Jan 2005 01:01 GMT Thanks! You are always good about answering me :).
J
>> I have done all the research I know to do on this (including an "ask" >> search whereby I was taken to my own same question 2 years ago to [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > But it is *NOT* a Nicad battery, and I tell people there is *NO* memory > effect, charge it once and keep it charged whenever possible. Traveling Man - 16 Jan 2005 04:04 GMT > I have done all the research I know to do on this (including an "ask" search > whereby I was taken to my own same question 2 years ago to Steve Sobol). I [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Janie New Li-Ion batteries should be chemically conditioned for best life.
1. Fully charge the battery. 2. Use the phone without recharging untll it shuts off by itself. 3. Repeat steps 1 and 2. 4. Now you can partially charge as needed.
I usually repeat steps 1 and 2 every six months or so and find my cell batteries usually last for the life of the phone, which for me is 1-1/2 to 2 years.
Peter Pan - 16 Jan 2005 05:04 GMT >> I have done all the research I know to do on this (including an >> "ask" search whereby I was taken to my own same question 2 years ago [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > batteries usually last for the life of the phone, which for me is > 1-1/2 to 2 years. Same old wifes tales.... and distorions being passed along...and they are WRONG!! Hey... they are LI-ion batteries, *NOT* Nicads!!!!!! Different batteries are handled differently.. Think about it, a lead acid car battery is never treated that way (it's fully charged once, and then topped off by the alternator whenever you start the car).. Ever wonder why you don't do the discharge/recharge cycle with car batteries? Cause they aren't Nicads!!!!!!!! You only do it with Ni-cads. People pass on the same rumours about laptop computers, they *USED* to have nicads, but now have Li-ion's!
(sorry for the ! marks, but I sell both computers and cellphones (including cellsockets that continuosly charge the phone when in the cradle), and it drives me nuts when folks do things exactly the wrong way cuz a "friend" told em to do it that way!)
Agreed. Lion batts don't need any special attention to last longer. If people were to use the battery as normal, it would last as long as if they did all their little special things they do.
> >> I have done all the research I know to do on this (including an > >> "ask" search whereby I was taken to my own same question 2 years ago [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > drives me nuts when folks do things exactly the wrong way cuz a "friend" > told em to do it that way!) D.J. Osborn - 16 Jan 2005 13:26 GMT "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in:
> New Li-Ion batteries should be chemically conditioned for best life. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > 2 > years. Please give the *documented* reference for these claims. Frankly, I don't believe them.
The life of the phone--and the battery--should be *well* over two years!
 Signature D.J., N8DO; FMCA 147762 dj[underscore]osborn at yahoo dot com
teddeli - 16 Jan 2005 14:20 GMT >"Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >The life of the phone--and the battery--should be *well* over two years! While I have not done exactly that, every owner's manual of every VZW I have ever had has said to let the battery run down for the first few uses.
While I can't document it, posters in this and the Howard Forums have complained about battery life on new phones. The answer has mostly been wait until the first few charges and battery life will improve. Replies have supported this and I have found it to be so on new phones I have purchased.
Peter Pan - 16 Jan 2005 15:06 GMT >> "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: >> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Replies have supported this and I have found it to be so on new phones > I have purchased. YOU ARE A STONE COLD LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THAT IS ***NOT*** IN ANY MANUAL OF ANY PHONE VERIZON SELLS! I really hate it when dumb a.s dickheads get on here and give totally false information and lie....
teddeli - 16 Jan 2005 18:14 GMT >>> "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: >>> [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] >I really hate it when dumb a.s dickheads get on here and give totally false >information and lie.... I may be wrong but not a liar.
Loosen your pantyhose a little.
D.J. Osborn - 16 Jan 2005 19:41 GMT >>"Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: >> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Replies have supported this and I have found it to be so on new phones > I have purchased. Since you can't document it, I'll continue not to believe it.
 Signature D.J., N8DO; FMCA 147762 dj[underscore]osborn at yahoo dot com
Traveling Man - 16 Jan 2005 21:52 GMT > "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > The life of the phone--and the battery--should be *well* over two years! http://is.med.ohio-state.edu/policies/battery.htm
Justin - 16 Jan 2005 22:43 GMT Traveling Man wrote on [Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:52:08 GMT]:
>> "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > http://is.med.ohio-state.edu/policies/battery.htm Which states the exact opposite to the claims above.
Peter Pan - 16 Jan 2005 23:57 GMT >> "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > http://is.med.ohio-state.edu/policies/battery.htm Did you miss this in your link? How can I maximize the performance of my battery?
"Exceptions to the rule are Li-Ion batteries which do not suffer from the memory effect."
================================================ Since almost all Cellphone batteries are Li-Ion now, that "exception" sure makes a major difference.
Traveling Man - 17 Jan 2005 00:28 GMT >>> "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: >>> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Since almost all Cellphone batteries are Li-Ion now, that "exception" sure > makes a major difference. I didn't say anything about memory effect. I said that for maximum life you should condition your battery.
D.J. Osborn - 17 Jan 2005 01:15 GMT "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in:
>> "Traveling Man" <none@none.com> wrote in: >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > http://is.med.ohio-state.edu/policies/battery.htm Are they a battery manufacturer? Obvious;y not! Let's see some documentation from the manufacturers. Documentation from an outfit that knows nothing about batteries is less than useless.
 Signature D.J., N8DO; FMCA 147762 dj[underscore]osborn at yahoo dot com
Bob Scheurle - 16 Jan 2005 13:43 GMT >I usually repeat steps 1 and 2 every six months or so and find my cell >batteries usually last for the life of the phone, which for me is 1-1/2 to 2 >years. And if you didn't do that, your batteries would last 1-1/2 to 2 years. Probably even longer!
John R. Copeland - 16 Jan 2005 16:40 GMT > New Li-Ion batteries should be chemically conditioned for best life. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > batteries usually last for the life of the phone, which for me is 1-1/2 to 2 > years. Steps 1 and 4 are appropriate for cell-phone batteries. Step 2 (along with 3) does no harm, but is unnecessary for cell phones. Step 2 can be appropriate for calibrating "fuel-gauge" chips which may be included in laptop-computer battery assemblies of multiple cells, and which give their computer a "percentage" number for charge state. Some of those chips are programmed to recalibrate themselves when they see that uninterrupted discharge/recharge cycle.
Cell phones normally use single Li-Ion cells, and I doubt that any of them use those fuel-gauge chips.
According to the experts who post in sci.chem.electrochem.battery, Li-Ion cells are shipped from the manufacturer with about a 50% charge, which is chemically the best for long-term storage. During the first several charges, the anode material will continue to form, and the milliamp-hour capacity of the cell will actually increase a bit. But the deep discharge of step 2 mentioned above is unnecessary.
You don't need to condition a Lion battery and charging for those whopping 10-12 hours before first initial use is just ridiculous. Lion batts do not need any priming whatsoever. When you get your new phone, charge the battery until it indicates full charge and that's it. No need to leave it there longer or discharge or cycle or whatever it is other people have told you. All these little things people do to Lion batteries are just coming from the old nickel days.
> I have done all the research I know to do on this (including an "ask" search > whereby I was taken to my own same question 2 years ago to Steve Sobol). I [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Janie dr.wireMORE@VZW-MidWESTma - 17 Jan 2005 07:45 GMT It isn't like I'm an electrical engineer.... wait, I am an electrical engineer: and here is what I tell my customers, all my customers lithium ion or not. Charge it up/down 3 times, if convenient; otherwise, it is just a phone, use it anyway you like, and if the battery dies early, buy another. No prob. dr
Generally: Take the phone out of the box, use it as you like, don't worry if it has a full charge or not. Use the phone the way you want, don't change your behavior just for a phone. BUT: if you want the maximum amount of life/power/capacity to your battery, 1st opportunity that is convenient do the following: 1) try and charge it up all night, over night to a full charge 2) run the phone down to a near discharge, and then repeat to charge it up all night. (basically full up/down three times).
However, if this is inconvenient, enjoy the phone, and don't worry about it. No matter what you do, expect a full 1 yr out of the battery. Less than 1 year, OUCH; More than 2 yrs, EXCELLENT. In between is pretty normal. In my opinion/experience: folks that condition their battery seem to get longer over-all life.
Worse case: conditioning has never hurt any battery. But in case of doubt, why not get the most out of your battery. You'll have to charge it anyway, why not overnight 3 times :-)
 Signature dr. wireMORE (don't accept "less", demand "more") Wireless Consultant/Engineer & Midwest VZW Master Agent Data, wi-fi, national access, smartphones, and home computer healthchecks, stop worrying... just ask for the dr.
If you need specific help, leave your email address & we'll try to contact
> You don't need to condition a Lion battery and charging for those whopping > 10-12 hours before first initial use is just ridiculous. Lion batts do not [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > > > Janie Traveling Man - 17 Jan 2005 13:23 GMT > It isn't like I'm an electrical engineer.... wait, I am an electrical > engineer: and here is what I tell my customers, all my customers lithium > ion or not. Charge it up/down 3 times, if convenient; otherwise, it is just > a phone, use it anyway you like, and if the battery dies early, buy another. FWIW, I also have a degree in Electrical Engineering.
> Generally: Take the phone out of the box, use it as you like, don't worry if > it has a full charge or not. Use the phone the way you want, don't change [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > 2) run the phone down to a near discharge, and then repeat to charge it up > all night. (basically full up/down three times).
> However, if this is inconvenient, enjoy the phone, and don't worry about it. > No matter what you do, expect a full 1 yr out of the battery. Less than 1 > year, OUCH; More than 2 yrs, EXCELLENT. In between is pretty normal. In my > opinion/experience: folks that condition their battery seem to get longer > over-all life. That has been my experience as well. My wife and I have never had to replace a cell phone battery since we started using them in the early 90's.
> Worse case: conditioning has never hurt any battery. But in case of doubt, > why not get the most out of your battery. You'll have to charge it anyway, > why not overnight 3 times :-) My point exactly. What can it hurt?
Quick - 17 Jan 2005 18:07 GMT >> It isn't like I'm an electrical engineer.... wait, I am an electrical >> engineer: and here is what I tell my customers, all my customers [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > My point exactly. What can it hurt? These statements from "engineers"?
1) Yes, conditioning "hurts" a battery since the battery only has a finite number of charge/discharge cycles. Condition it and you've used up one of those (or part of one). In the case of LiIon batteries you haven't extended the life of the battery but, in fact, reduced it by one cycle.
2) "In my opinion/experience: folks that condition their battery seem to get longer over-all life". Really? Is this an impression or do you have any real data to confirm this?
Please use some of that "electrical engineering" talk to explain why this is so in the context of LiIon batteries.
3) I actually agree that some people *should* condition their batteries. These people actually feel better if they do that. They either believe it or they aren't sure but want to cover their bases. Many of these people are rather superstitious too. For them the peace of mind and perceived gain is well worth the cost of their time, electricity, and decreased battery life.
-Quick
I do have to agree with you here. People, even if there's proof, still want to condition a lion battery for some strange reason. Being an electrical engineer, doctor, lawyer, doesn't mean you're smart or have any common sense. The fact is lion batteries do not need any special conditioning to get the full capacity life out of them. What does it take?
> >> It isn't like I'm an electrical engineer.... wait, I am an electrical > >> engineer: and here is what I tell my customers, all my customers [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > -Quick dr.wireMORE@VZW-MidWESTma - 18 Jan 2005 02:09 GMT Allow me to offer my non-technical opinion. I use a battery operated shaver; It is a lithium battery, and I charge it up, and run it into the ground, never re-charging it until it is depleted. Lithium batteries, according to many, have about 342.8 full cycles (300 something, the 42.8 added for the geeks) of charging. Be that as it may, I've never had a battery die (wouldn't recharge), and I follow my own advice. My shavers have lasted up to 12 years by charging only when it is near dead. FWIW
Hey the batteries are only $39.99 or a penny on ebay. Do as you like, and enjoy; save from dropping it into water, it will probably work just fine for ya. Dr.
> I do have to agree with you here. People, even if there's proof, still want > to condition a lion battery for some strange reason. Being an electrical [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > > > > -Quick Quick - 18 Jan 2005 02:52 GMT Below you prefaced your original statement with "...wait, I am an electrical engineer:"
Your reply begins "...my non-technical opinion."
You say your shavers have lasted up to 12 years by charging only when it is near dead.
Did they have LiIon batteries 12 years ago? In a shaver? Are you implying that they would have lasted less than 12 years if you had charged them following each use? Do you know that they wouldn't have gone 14 years if you had charged following each use?
Did you "condition" your shaver battery by leaving it running on the counter until dead, recharging, and repeating 2 or 3 times when your first got it?
Did you try not fully discharging before recharging a few times to see of the serviceable time between recharges decreased (memory effect)?
I'm curious how you came to your conclusion?
-Quick
> Allow me to offer my non-technical opinion. I use a > battery operated shaver; It is a lithium battery, and I [quoted text clipped - 84 lines] >>> >>> -Quick dr.wireMORE@VZW-MidWESTma - 18 Jan 2005 04:46 GMT Yes, as a matter of fact. I did condition it from "use." But, since you asked, when it was low, but not quite dead, I would leave it on the counter and let it run till it was deep dead. Only did that 3 times. My last comment on the subject, and thanks for the interaction: dr.
You wrote: Did you "condition" your shaver battery by leaving it running on the counter until dead, recharging, and repeating 2 or 3 times when your first got it?
My god man...owning an electrical shaver for 12 years is crazy (for me anyway) in itself! I mean what kind do you have...the first ones ever made? The technology and types have really gotten much better in the last several years....and you've had yours for 12. I mean, if it works great for you and you are happy then so be it. I just hope you're not a cheap a.s holding onto an old shaver because you can't face the fact to shell out some money for a new one. Please, don't let my comments offend you. I had several friends that were just like that and I know exactly how they are. They would hold onto anything that worked (even if it worked like sh.t) because they couldn't deal with shelling out money for a new one. Good luck with the shaver...and your skin! :)
> Allow me to offer my non-technical opinion. I use a battery operated > shaver; It is a lithium battery, and I charge it up, and run it into the [quoted text clipped - 73 lines] > > > > > > -Quick CharlesH - 17 Jan 2005 22:26 GMT In these routine threads about the merits of conditioning LiIon batteries, it is important to distinguish between "conditioning", which is a one-time process of fully charging and then fully discharging the battery a couple of times when the battery is new, and "memory effect", which says that you should completely charge/discharge the battery every time. As often stated, "memory effect" applies only to nickel-based batteries (and some even question that), and is not relevant to LiIon batteries. "Conditioning" may or may not be needed, depending on who you talk to. Some who acknowledge the concept of "conditioning" LiIon batteries say that the manufacturer has already taken care of that, so the user doesn't have to do anything. But in any case, "conditioning" and "memory effect" are two entirely different issues.
Traveling Man - 19 Jan 2005 14:10 GMT Look Guys, we are driving this issue into the ground. Do what you want, all I know is that, for me, conditioning Lion batteries has a positive effect on their lifetime of usage.
FWIW, I quote the following from the instructions included with the Mugen 2000 mAh Lion battery I bought for my Pocket PC. I was going to post a scanned JPG of it, but thought I'd open a whole new negative thread of "posting binaries in text newsgroups" <G>.
"ATTENTION
Batteries should be initially charged and discharged 3-5 times to achieve stated capacity.
Always charge the new battery for at least 12 hours before use.
(Then a few lines of avoiding high temperatures and using approved chargers)"
This from a manufacturer of Lion batteries. The defense rests...
Quick - 19 Jan 2005 19:05 GMT > Look Guys, we are driving this issue into the ground. > Do what you want, all I know is that, for me, > conditioning Lion batteries has a positive effect on > their lifetime of usage. "we are driving this issue into the ground"
Nice. Is this supposed to be the endall to the discussion? After which you go on to say:
"all I know is that,"
HOW do you know this? Anything more than just your perception? How about some actual science? These are physical things after all and not some sort of art open to individual interpretation.
"for me,"
Oh, for you this is true but maybe not for everybody? Something to do with body chemistry maybe?
> FWIW, I quote the following from the instructions > included with the Mugen 2000 mAh Lion battery I > bought for my Pocket PC. Instructions included by whom? Mugen or who you bought the battery from?
> (Then a few lines of avoiding high temperatures and using > approved chargers)" Approved chargers? Approved by Mugen?
> This from a manufacturer of Lion batteries. > The defense rests... And how do you know that these same instructions aren't included with *every* consumer battery they sell? Regardless of type or application? Maybe they just found that they greatly reduced the number of calls to support asking "There aren't any instructions to condition my battery, how do I go about doing that?"
I know it's not going to be as fun as continuing the discussion here with beliefs and feelings but you might try searching
sci.chem.electrochem.battery for "conditioning Li-Ion batteries" to see what some real scientists and engineers in the field have to say about it. They actually use real live scientific terms and references.
-Quick
Traveling Man - 20 Jan 2005 02:22 GMT > "we are driving this issue into the ground" > > Nice. Is this supposed to be the endall to the discussion? For me, yes. I've wasted enough time on this subject already.
>> FWIW, I quote the following from the instructions >> included with the Mugen 2000 mAh Lion battery I >> bought for my Pocket PC. > > Instructions included by whom? Mugen or who you > bought the battery from? From Mugen.
>> (Then a few lines of avoiding high temperatures and using >> approved chargers)" > > Approved chargers? Approved by Mugen? Yep.
> And how do you know that these same instructions aren't > included with *every* consumer battery they sell? I don't, and neither do you. The instructions were printed on the card that identified that specific battery. I would think they would not recommend conditioning if it was not needed or could cause warranty failures.
> sci.chem.electrochem.battery for "conditioning > Li-Ion batteries" to see what some real scientists > and engineers in the field have to say about it. > They actually use real live scientific terms and > references. Bully for them. Research can be tailored to meet any results a person wants or needs.
Like I said, do what makes you happy. I'll do the same for me.
Quick - 20 Jan 2005 02:45 GMT > I don't, and neither do you. The instructions were > printed on the card that identified that specific > battery. I would think they would not recommend > conditioning if it was not needed or could cause warranty > failures. Yes, they would not recommend it if it might cause warranty failures. They very well might recommend it if it was not needed and did no measurable harm. Simply so people like you (probably a majority using these batteries in these types of applications) will feel better. Probably reduces their support costs answering the phones and may even increase sales. It may be the very same card they attach to their NiCad and NiMH batteries -- savings in literature costs. Just change the battery model in the document and run off a few thousand.
> Bully for them. Research can be tailored to meet > any results a person wants or needs. durrr, this is not research. It's fact. At least until you repeal the laws of physics. Don't look at it, it's easier to deny that way.
> Like I said, do what makes you happy. > I'll do the same for me. I did not intend to get you to do anything differently. In fact there is little measurable negative effect from conditioning Li-Ion batteries. It is very worth doing if it makes you feel better. Just don't claim there is a physical gain by doing so.
-Quick
pianodirt - 20 Jan 2005 20:59 GMT Quick Wrote:
> wrote > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > -Quick Key word here is "probably" (reduces support costs). Do YOU have an real hard facts backing this up? Have you called Mugen and talked t the engineers who created this battery and then to the tekkie writer who wrote the user manual for this battery? If not then, you ar reaming Travelling Man for not having any hard data to back up hi claim but then you don't have any to back up your claim. You might eve be right in your claim about support costs...but as you know, "might and "probably" don't cut it in the world of Newtonian physics
|
|
|