Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Verizon / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Beware of minutes/current billing cycle when "upgrading" plan!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Janie Collins - 21 Jan 2005 00:34 GMT
I'm sure this gets posted a lot, but incase there's someone out there who
doesn't know..........

I signed on for 2 more years (what can I say?  I like Verizon) and went from
400 to 450 minutes.  I changed 4 days into my new billing cycle.  I was told
that I would have the whole 450 minutes for this month (I even asked "will
it be pro-rated?" and was told "no").  I decided to call CS to make sure,
only to find out that it WAS pro-rated and (how the hell they did THIS math,
I'll never know!) I only had 392 minutes this billing cycle (remember I
started off with 400)!  I just don't want anyone out there burning their
additional minutes on their "new plan" only to get their bill and have to
mess with CS to "fight it".

Janie
Quick - 21 Jan 2005 01:28 GMT
> I'm sure this gets posted a lot, but incase there's
> someone out there who doesn't know..........
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> their "new plan" only to get their bill and have to mess
> with CS to "fight it".

(400/31) * 4 = 51.6 minutes for the first 4 days of the month.
(450/30) * 26 = 391.9 minutes for the last 27 days of the month.
I don't know how they handle the fractional minutes. Looks like
they rounded up on the second calculation.

Go over either one of these figures and you get charged overage.

-Quick
Quick - 21 Jan 2005 01:42 GMT
> month. (450/30) * 26 = 391.9 minutes for the last 27 days

oops, (450/31) * 27 = 391.9

Went from 30 to 31 days on the top equation and didn't
change everything on the bottom one...

-Quick
Janie Collins - 21 Jan 2005 02:32 GMT
Thanks, Quick.  I still don't understand why the customer is penalized in
this way.  For instance, I didn't use any minutes on Th (when my new billing
cycle started) or Fri last week.  Sa and Su--no prob, unlimited.
Monday--new plan.  So, (had I not received retention minutes from CS because
of this) I would have been penalized for not using those 51.6 minutes from
my "old" plan on Th and F.  They just disappeared!  Now I only have 391.9 of
what should have been a pro-ration of 400/4 days plus 450/27 days.  See what
I mean?

Tx,

Janie
>> month. (450/30) * 26 = 391.9 minutes for the last 27 days
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -Quick
Quick - 21 Jan 2005 03:05 GMT
> Thanks, Quick.  I still don't understand why the customer
> is penalized in this way.  For instance, I didn't use any
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> should have been a pro-ration of 400/4 days plus 450/27
> days.  See what I mean?

Well, kind of...
What they do is break your billing period into two separate
periods. So what you are asking for is equivalent to rollover
minutes which they don't do. In the normal situation if you
don't use your minutes for the month they do not roll over
to the next month. Kind of the same thing. You also do not
have to switch plans in the middle of a billing period. You
can accept a new plan in the middle of the month to be
effective on your next billing cycle date.

The pro-rate is to simplify the plan switch. In your case it
sounds like the only change was the increase in minutes.
In other cases there may be different promos, different features,
and a completely different class of plan.  For example going
from a national access plan to a secondary line on an existing
familyshare. Some things don't even map from one to another
and it would be a real mess doing it and then an even bigger
mess trying to explain it to customers.  That's my guess anyway.

-Quick
Janie Collins - 21 Jan 2005 03:22 GMT
Well, truth is, it won't effect me because I did get extra minutes--just in
case.  I simply didn't want anyone else getting a bill that actually charged
them overage when they didn't really go over their "original allowance" for
that billing cycle.  I'm guessing it's probably easier getting "retention
minutes" beforehand rather than after.

Thanks for the explanation, I understand the logic, I just don't think it's
"fair".

J
>> Thanks, Quick.  I still don't understand why the customer
>> is penalized in this way.  For instance, I didn't use any
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> -Quick
cricket - 21 Jan 2005 04:03 GMT
> them overage when they didn't really go over their "original allowance"
> for that billing cycle.  I'm guessing it's probably easier getting
> "retention minutes" beforehand rather than after.
>
> Thanks for the explanation, I understand the logic, I just don't think
> it's "fair".

My opinion is if the minutes used are at or below the allowance on the
lowest plan, then they shouldn't prorate. Proration should only kick in when
you exceed the plan with the lowest allowance.
cricket - 21 Jan 2005 03:59 GMT
I went from a nation access 400 to a AC 400 and had overage when they
prorated and I only used a total of like 200 billable minutes that month. My
logic said 'using 200 of 400 allotted minutes should not result in
overage' - but verizon's logic doesn't work like mine.. doesn't sound like
it works like your logic either. (The csr gave me a credit for it when I
complained.)

> Thanks, Quick.  I still don't understand why the customer is penalized in
> this way.  For instance, I didn't use any minutes on Th (when my new
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>> -Quick
Janie Collins - 21 Jan 2005 04:34 GMT
Good job--that's certainly what they should have done!

Janie

>I went from a nation access 400 to a AC 400 and had overage when they
>prorated and I only used a total of like 200 billable minutes that month.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>>
>>> -Quick
Frankster - 21 Jan 2005 04:54 GMT
When I changed from a 400hr/mo plan to an 800hr/mo plan, I had used about
350hrs on my currnet month plan.  But I changed in the middle of the billing
period.  I was told that since my old 400hr/mo plan calculated to an average
of 13min per day, and since I has used 350 in 15 days (resulting in an
average use of 23min per day for 15 days...) I was charged an "overage" of 8
minutes per day, for 15 days (8*15) for a total of 120 OVERAGE minutes.
EVEN THOUGH I DID NOT EXCEED MY MONTHLY ALLOWANCE OF 400 minutes.

I guess what they were trying to say was that had I continued on that
average with my old plan, without upgrading, I would have been over my
minutes.  So they charged me that much to upgrade my plan to my new amount
of minutes (800).

Funny thing is, they did offer that I could wait till the end of the billing
cycle to upgrade.  I said, no, do it right away. Of course I did not know
the significance of my decision.

Kinda sucks really.  I think most people decide to upgrade to more minutes
when they see there are at great risk of overrunning (or maybe already
have).  Why not just let that go, since, after all, they are upgrading to
more expensive service.  But, OH NO, big V just has to add insult to injury
by slapping you in the face for upgrading before you overran your limit.

Just stupid PR in my opinion.

-Frank

> I'm sure this gets posted a lot, but incase there's someone out there who
> doesn't know..........
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Janie
Frankster - 21 Jan 2005 04:55 GMT
Ooops.. not 400hr/mo and 800hr/mo, but 400MIN/mo and 800MIN/mo.  Sorry!  :)

-Frank

> When I changed from a 400hr/mo plan to an 800hr/mo plan, I had used about
> 350hrs on my currnet month plan.  But I changed in the middle of the
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>>
>> Janie
Janie Collins - 21 Jan 2005 14:08 GMT
Well, I did email my salesman (who is new to Verizon, I actually recognized
him as being with a different cell company in the past) to let him know to
be aware of this and hopefully prevent him any problems with customers,
because I like him and honestly believe he believed what he was telling me.
(Hmm, I wonder how many people have me going directly into their spam
folder? :).  As I said, I was "an informed customer" thanks to you guys, he
just wasn't as informed, apparently.  I asked when my new plan would take
effect (now), how many minutes I would have for this billing cycle (450),
and if they were pro-rated (no).  I'm just *lucky* to be anal enough to have
called CS a few times to find out for sure.  The first CS I talked to told
me that I could count on "around 420 minutes this billing cycle", but made
no mention that the billing cycle itself was two complete entities!  I asked
all the right questions.  I guess that's why I got the retention minutes,
because I explained my story nicely, but did say it wasn't fair.  I suppose
as long as CS ends up NOT charging for "overage" that isn't really overage
in these situations, we can live <G>, but I think it's a bit annoying to
even have to call CS about it.

Janie
> Ooops.. not 400hr/mo and 800hr/mo, but 400MIN/mo and 800MIN/mo.  Sorry!
> :)
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>>>
>>> Janie
Quick - 21 Jan 2005 17:29 GMT
>  I suppose as long as CS ends
> up NOT charging for "overage" that isn't really overage
> in these situations, we can live <G>, but I think it's a
> bit annoying to even have to call CS about it.

About 2 years ago I think they had a big push about
this problem. During that period I called to check on
plan changes at least 3 times (and changed once) and
all 3 CSRs insisted on explaining the prorate in
excruciating detail. I would tell them that I understood
it very well and they pressed on anyway.

It is a constant issue. It's an easy concept but hard to
explain and I think people get some idea of how they
think it works in their mind and then don't hear the
explanation when given. Waiving the overage charges
in these cases is an exception but an exception that
they make almost every time. I do think they check
for previous occurrences on your account.

-Quick
Janie Collins - 21 Jan 2005 17:37 GMT
I know on some level the way Verizon does this makes sense, but I probably
always "get a break" because I historically use half or less of my monthly
allowance, and I have free LD from home so I rarely even use N/W minutes.
Because I am going on vacation at the end of this billing cycle and will be
away from my kiddo, I have been "hoarding" my minutes till my trip.  The
fact that I was being screwed in this matter (and not in a good way :) by
essentially losing so many of my allowed minutes in the first 4 days of this
billing cycle is what really pissed me off.  I forget that other people
actually REALLY use their phones and their minutes.  As I said, it all
worked out for me and I'll probably still only use a total of 200 minutes
this month if even that, but felt that I most definitely should have been
allowed my 400 minutes even if they were all on the last day of my billing
cycle!  See what I mean?

Thanks, Quick.

Janie
>>  I suppose as long as CS ends
>> up NOT charging for "overage" that isn't really overage
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> -Quick
cricket - 21 Jan 2005 06:13 GMT
when I called Tuesday to change my plan to the new one, she looked at the
figures for all the lines and said it would be better to wait - I think it
was like 113, 100 and 6 on a 400 plan (per web site), with 10 days left in
the cycle - I thought it wouldwork for proration, but maybe she has more up
to date usage than I could see. Or she didn't want to risk more problems for
me - my other account is apparently a mess. (see my last post in the PA/TN
thread)

> When I changed from a 400hr/mo plan to an 800hr/mo plan, I had used about
> 350hrs on my currnet month plan.  But I changed in the middle of the
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>>
>> Janie
Quick - 21 Jan 2005 06:37 GMT
> Funny thing is, they did offer that I could wait till the
> end of the billing cycle to upgrade.  I said, no, do it
> right away. Of course I did not know the significance of
> my decision.

Most often they encourage you to wait until your billing
cycle. They will usually do the math for you to see if
you are in jepardy of pro-rate overage charges.

> Kinda sucks really.  I think most people decide to
> upgrade to more minutes when they see there are at great
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> add insult to injury by slapping you in the face for
> upgrading before you overran your limit.

I guess they could avoid all the problems and bad feelings
by only allowing plan changes to take effect on the billing
date.

-Quick
Bill Radio - 21 Jan 2005 08:03 GMT
I, too, got stuck in pro-rating until I realized that the extra 100 minute
bonus I received last year was still in effect for this entire billing
period.  So, while I would have gone over, the bonus takes care of the
overage.  To Verizon's credit, the 'bonus' lasted longer than they said it
would, and it stayed with my account even after making two plan changes in
over two months.  Not everything they do is unfair.

Bill Radio
Click for Western U.S. Wireless Reviews at:
http://www.mountainwireless.com

> > Funny thing is, they did offer that I could wait till the
> > end of the billing cycle to upgrade.  I said, no, do it
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> -Quick
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.