Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Verizon / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

More Ohio charges

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Scott - 29 Jan 2006 18:02 GMT
Who decides if this is a "material" change or not?  The service is
awesome but the fees , regardless of how small, and changes in the terms are
getting really old.

     Attention Ohio Customers
     In February we'll begin collecting a .11 percent surcharge to recover
our cost of an assessment imposed by the OH PUC. It will appear in the
Verizon
Wireless Surcharges section of your bill as OH REG FEE. This Verizon
Wireless charge is
not a tax and is subject to change. Please refer to "Our Rights To Make
Changes" in
your Customer Agreement for information about changes.
Scott - 29 Jan 2006 18:07 GMT
Sorry for the duplicate post!
> Who decides if this is a "material" change or not?  The service is
> awesome but the fees , regardless of how small, and changes in the terms
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Changes" in
> your Customer Agreement for information about changes.
George - 29 Jan 2006 18:09 GMT
>  Who decides if this is a "material" change or not?  The service is
> awesome but the fees , regardless of how small, and changes in the terms are
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Changes" in
> your Customer Agreement for information about changes.

You already started a thread with the exact post hours ago and received
replies.
Scott - 29 Jan 2006 18:20 GMT
I know.  For some reason the msg was in my Outbox again and OE reposted.

I read your msg on the orig posting.  Ohio is ridiculous with taxes and our
surrouding states are having a good time attracting our businesses and
families.
>>  Who decides if this is a "material" change or not?  The service is
>> awesome but the fees , regardless of how small, and changes in the terms
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> You already started a thread with the exact post hours ago and received
> replies.
Clark W. Griswold, Jr. - 29 Jan 2006 21:00 GMT
>I read your msg on the orig posting.  Ohio is ridiculous with taxes and our
>surrouding states are having a good time attracting our businesses and
>families.

According to Steve's post, there hasn't been anything other that Verizon's
statement that this was an attempt to generate more revenue from Ohio
subscribers.

Given how sucessful they've been at addon fees, its not surprising they wouldn't
try another one. I understand the next will be a electrical cost recovery fee,
for the cost of running all those expensive transmitters...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.