Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsGSMBluetooth
Providers
AlltelATT WirelessCingularFidoNextelSprint PCST-MobileVerizon
Manufacturers
EricssonNokiaMotorola
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK Group
Related Topics
PocketPCPalmMore Topics ...

Cellular Phone Forum / Providers / Verizon / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Verizon Retirement

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Kapili - 23 Feb 2006 15:33 GMT
John Kapili announces www.johnkapili.com/PensionER.

If you were an employee of GTE Wireless (now Verizon) that was sold to
AllTel on 6-29-2000, you need to become a member of this website. Your
pension benefits may not be what you thought they were going to be. GTE (now
Verizon) told their employees that their "Deferred Vested" benefits would be
available to them when they retire. If you are like most employees you
thought this meant that you would be able to collect your full GTE pension
(based on your years of work at GTE) when you reached early retirement age.
The truth is you cannot get 100% of your money until you reach age 65.
Agent_C - 23 Feb 2006 16:35 GMT
>The truth is you cannot get 100% of your money until you reach age 65.

So what's the big deal? That seems perfectly reasonable to me.

A_C
Notan - 23 Feb 2006 16:45 GMT
> >The truth is you cannot get 100% of your money until you reach age 65.
>
> So what's the big deal? That seems perfectly reasonable to me.

Isn't it that way with most companies?

I'd say, be happy Verizon even offers retirement benefits, as a large number
of companies, these days, are just dropping them!

Notan
Dean - 28 Feb 2006 00:44 GMT
If your company established a plan where you could invest money, and that
you could get the money out when you retired, and that you could retire at
55 (at a reduced pension), then changed the rules and told you you'd have to
wait until 10 years after you retired to get the money, that wouldn't bother
you?

Whether a company offers a pension, or No pension, or tells you they'll TAKE
money from you when you retire, isn't the issue. What's at issue is
fairness. It's unfair in any game to change the rules to one side's
advantage once the game has started. People chose to accept employment in
certain companies because of the benefits offered.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, companies are cutting and eliminating pensions. If it were
due to the company losing money to the point that the execs lost their
multi-million bonuses and golden parachutes, that would be one thing.
Instead, the fat cats are getting fatter by playing these pension games.

Don't start remedying the situation by cutting the throat of the little guy
who built your company. In the end, it's bad business.

Dean
___________________________________________

>>The truth is you cannot get 100% of your money until you reach age 65.
>
> So what's the big deal? That seems perfectly reasonable to me.
>
> A_C
Agent_C - 28 Feb 2006 19:39 GMT
>If your company established a plan where you could invest money, and that
>you could get the money out when you retired, and that you could retire at
>55 (at a reduced pension), then changed the rules and told you you'd have to
>wait until 10 years after you retired to get the money, that wouldn't bother
>you?

20 years ago; yes, but in today's world, one has to accept economic
realities.

It's very unlikely Verizon violated the law when they amended their
retirement plans. Too many lawyers on staff for that... More likely
you didn't read the fine print in one of those many notices they send
out.

A_C
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.