Wondering if it's practical to use the phone to access the Web. I
have an LG6000, which I don't think is MW 2.0 compatible.
Thanks,
Paul
CellGuy - 16 Mar 2006 15:12 GMT
> Wondering if it's practical to use the phone to access the Web. I
> have an LG6000, which I don't think is MW 2.0 compatible.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
I use it to check email. Browsing is limited.
Paul_B - 16 Mar 2006 16:36 GMT
>> Wondering if it's practical to use the phone to access the Web. I
>> have an LG6000, which I don't think is MW 2.0 compatible.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I use it to check email. Browsing is limited.
I'd probably most be interested in email, stock prices, maybe
headline news, and local directions/points of interest. My son
seems to use his Nextel pretty well this way, and I was wondering
how V's stacks up to it and to Cingular.
paul
CellGuy - 16 Mar 2006 22:55 GMT
> I'd probably most be interested in email, stock prices, maybe
> headline news, and local directions/points of interest. My son
> seems to use his Nextel pretty well this way, and I was wondering
> how V's stacks up to it and to Cingular.
>
> paul
Mine does all of this, except for the directions thing. There is a GIN
program that will do that for $2/month.
If you have an EVDO phone the stuff comes in pretty fast.
Eric - 18 Mar 2006 07:00 GMT
"Wondering if it's practical to use the phone to access the Web. I
have an LG6000, which I don't think is MW 2.0 compatible. "
I use it for checking the weather and browsing in a place where I have
a few minutes to kill, such as waiting for lunch and the like. Don't
really know if it is worth it, but hey, it works.
I just wish I could get a real browser instead of a WAP one.
CriticalMass - 29 Mar 2006 15:47 GMT
> Wondering if it's practical to use the phone to access the Web.
Most web sites are designed for viewing on desktop screens with the
resolutions you are familiar with. It's technically *possible* to do it
on the much smaller (ex. 320X240 or less) cellphone screens, but the
limitations are obvious. You'll do a lot of scrolling, both
horizontally and vertically, to be able to see all the information.
I tried it long ago and decided it wasn't worth the effort when I'm
normally only a few hours max away from getting back in front of my
desktop system.
Remove This - 29 Mar 2006 18:01 GMT
>> Wondering if it's practical to use the phone to access the Web.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> limitations are obvious. You'll do a lot of scrolling, both horizontally
> and vertically, to be able to see all the information.
Most "WAP" websites are designed to those limitations..

Signature
I work for the ILEC ...." stuff happens! "
CriticalMass - 30 Mar 2006 02:57 GMT
> Most "WAP" websites are designed to those limitations..
*MOST* websites AREN'T "WAP" websites.
susan - 30 Mar 2006 03:12 GMT
>> Most "WAP" websites are designed to those limitations..
>>
> *MOST* websites AREN'T "WAP" websites.
I found it to be worth it for the ability to check the weather, my email and
news headlines. It doesn't replace a computer, but is well worth the $5.00 a
month.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://siriussatelliteradio.blogspot.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
rring - 30 Mar 2006 05:00 GMT
>> Most "WAP" websites are designed to those limitations..
>>
>*MOST* websites AREN'T "WAP" websites.
There are enough of them around if you bother to look. This one list
took 2 seconds to find:
http://www.palowireless.com/wap/portals.asp
Pegleg - 30 Mar 2006 16:15 GMT
>There are enough of them around if you bother to look. This one list
>took 2 seconds to find:
>
>http://www.palowireless.com/wap/portals.asp
Not much of use there...broken links and sites of questionable
integrity...Russia, Rumania, etc.
Pegleg
U.S. Navy Retired
Support Our Troops,
Question The Policy!
All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words:
freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope.
Sir Winston Churchill
CriticalMass - 30 Mar 2006 16:18 GMT
> There are enough of them around if you bother to look. This one list
> took 2 seconds to find:
>
> http://www.palowireless.com/wap/portals.asp
And, your point is? So you found a list of a few random WAP sites. You
confirm my previous contention, that *MOST* websites AREN'T "WAP" websites."
When I go online, I go there to access websites that have the content
that interests me, not simply because they use a particular protocol.
Going to WAP sites with the cellphone, only because they're WAP sites,
seems like a goofy idea, when they don't contain anything of interest to
me.
It also makes no sense to me to pay data surcharges to get this stuff
into my phone, with it's limited form factor, with I can do it on my
desktop and get it done right. I believe a lot of people do it "just
because they can". If these users have such unlimited financial
resources that this is not an issue to them, great, but the cost
outweighs the benefit to me.
al - 30 Mar 2006 22:07 GMT
>>> Most "WAP" websites are designed to those limitations..
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.palowireless.com/wap/portals.asp
Cool link!
clifto - 30 Mar 2006 06:46 GMT
> Wondering if it's practical to use the phone to access the Web.
It came in handy just the other day when we wanted to call a
restaurant we knew only by its name and rough location. I've played
with it on nights and weekends a fair amount for fun, but this
showed me it's worth having.

Signature
All relevant people are pertinent.
All rude people are impertinent.
Therefore, no rude people are relevant.
-- Solomon W. Golomb
Paul_B - 30 Mar 2006 14:29 GMT
> Wondering if it's practical to use the phone to access the Web. I
> have an LG6000, which I don't think is MW 2.0 compatible.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
Thanks to everyone so far. A few years back I used my StarTac as
a modem for my PDA, and went to any site I wanted. But I guess
they're stricter about that now. I've learned you get only
certain sites via a voice+ plan, then you need to buy a data
plan, and then another plan to do the modem thing. Everything's
getting more complicated and expensive.
I'm currently thinking about the best way to get online mobility.
I could use my PDA for navigation, a laptop for internet via
wi-fi (word is that google is going to wi-fi the nation,
undoubtedly beginning with hi-pop areas), and just keep the cell
for voice.
Verizon has a new nav program with voice, but it's $12/m plus
airtime. Still cheaper than dedicated Nav, but with a smaller
screen and more difficult input.
Weighing a lot of things at this point.
Paul